Revised Request for Confidentiality

0111-EX-PL-2016 Text Documents

Harris Corporation

2016-02-23ELS_173150

February 12, 2016


Filed Electronically

Marlene H. Dortch
Secretary
Federal Communications Commission
445 12th Street S.W.
Washington, DC 20554

Re:      Request for Confidential Treatment, File No. 0111-EX-PL-2016


Dear Ms. Dortch:

       Pursuant to the provisions of Sections 0.457 and 0.459 of the Commission’s rules
governing submission of confidential materials,1 Harris Corporation (“Harris”) respectfully
requests that the narrative portion of above-referenced experimental license application be
afforded confidential treatment and not be placed in the Commission’s public files. Harris is
providing this information to the Commission in a confidential exhibit to accompany its
application.

       The confidential information qualifies as “trade secrets and commercial or financial
information” that “would customarily be guarded from competitors” and are not routinely made
available to the public for inspection by the Commission.2

       In support of this request and pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 0.459(b), Harris hereby states as
follows:

             1. The information contained in the narrative contains operational and design details
                regarding a proprietary system Harris is developing for one of its customers.
                Information regarding the system has been kept confidential and is considered a
                trade secret by Harris and its customer.3




1
    47 C.F.R. §§ 0.457, 0.459.
2
 See 47 C.F.R. § 0.457(d); see also Critical Mass Energy Project v. NRC, 975 F.2d 871, 879
(D.C. Cir. 1992) (“[W]e conclude that financial or commercial information provided to the
Government on a voluntary basis is ‘confidential’ for the purpose of Exemption 4 if it is of a
kind that would customarily not be released to the public by the person from whom it was
obtained.”).
3
    47 C.F.R. § 0.459(b)(3).


Marlene H. Dortch
February 12, 2016
Page 2

              2. Harris is in the business of manufacturing communications systems, a highly
                 competitive industry.4

              3. Public release of this proprietary and confidential information would undercut the
                 ability of Harris’ customer to bring its innovative system to the market. It would
                 also commercially damage Harris’ relationships with its customers and its
                 reputation for protecting the confidential information of its partners.5

              4. Harris and its customer have taken significant measures to safeguard the
                 confidentiality of the system’s design and have not publicly disclosed the details
                 contained in the narrative.6

              5. Harris requests that the confidential information be withheld from disclosure for
                 an indefinite period.7 Because of the competitive nature of Harris’ business,
                 disclosure of this information could jeopardize the competitive position of both
                 Harris and its customer.

              6. Harris notes that a denial of its request would impair the Commission’s ability to
                 obtain this type of voluntarily disclosed information in the future, making review
                 of applications more problematic.8 The ability of a government agency to
                 continually obtain confidential information was the legislative intent for
                 developing exemptions from the Freedom of Information Act.9 The U.S. Court of
                 Appeals for the D.C. Circuit has recognized a “private interest in preserving the
                 confidentiality of information that is provided to the Government on a voluntary
                 basis.”10




4
    47 C.F.R. § 0.459(b)(4).
5
    47 C.F.R. § 0.459(b)(5).
6
    47 C.F.R. § 0.459(b)(6-7).
7
    47 C.F.R. § 0.459(b)(8).
8
    47 C.F.R. § 0.459(b)(9).
9
 See Critical Mass Energy Project v. NRC, 975 F.2d 871, 878 (D.C. Cir. 1992) (“Where,
however, the information is provided to the Government voluntarily, the presumption is that [the
Government’s] interest will be threatened by disclosure as the persons whose confidences have
been betrayed will, in all likelihood, refuse further cooperation.”).
10
     Id. at 879.


Marlene H. Dortch
February 12, 2016
Page 3

       Harris requests that the Commission return this submission if its request for
confidentiality is denied.11 Please address any questions to the undersigned.


                                                     Respectfully submitted,


                                                      /s/ William F. LeBeau
                                                     Name
                                                     FCC Legal Counsel to Harris Corporation
                                                     Title




11
     See 47 C.F.R. § 0.459(e).



Document Created: 2016-02-23 10:45:36
Document Modified: 2016-02-23 10:45:36

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC