Toggle navigation
FCC.report
IBFS
ELS
FCC ID
Contact
About
FCC.report
›
ELS
›
Google Inc.
›
0878-EX-ST-2012
Google Inc.
0878-EX-ST-2012
Status: Grant Expired Due to New License
WF9XKU
2012-11-02
Documents and Communications:
[
refresh
]
Description
Category
Date
E-Mail generated [Nov 2 2012]
Correspondence
2012-11-02
Incoming generated [Nov 2 2012]
Correspondence
2012-11-02
Grant E-mail Notification generated [Nov 3 2012]
Correspondence
2012-11-05
Attachment 1
Text Documents
2012-10-31
E-Mail generated [Nov 2 2012]
Correspondence
2012-11-02
Incoming generated [Nov 2 2012]
Correspondence
2012-11-02
Grant E-mail Notification generated [Nov 3 2012]
Correspondence
2012-11-05
Attachment 1
Text Documents
2012-10-31
Application Form:
OET Special Temporary Authority Report
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL TEMPORARY AUTHORITY
Applicant Name
Name of Applicant:
Google Inc.
Address
Attention:
Aparna Sridhar
Street Address:
1101 New York Ave. NW, Second Floor
P.O. Box:
City:
Washington
State:
DC
Zip Code:
20005
Country:
E-Mail Address:
[email protected]
Best Contact
Give the following information of person who can best handle inquiries pertaining to this application:
Last Name:
Johnston
First Name:
E. Ashton
Title:
Lampert, O'Connor & Johnston, P.C.
Phone Number:
202.887.6230
Explanation
Please explain in the area below why an STA is necessary:
On January 26, 2012, Google Inc. (?Google?) was granted special temporary authority (STA) to test a next-generation personal communications device (Call Sign WF9XKU). The STA was extended to December 15, 2012, see File No. 0448-EX-ST-2012, in order to ensure that Google could continue testing until receipt of equipment authorization, which Google anticipated receiving in the fourth quarter of this year. Google now expects to receive equipment authorization early in the first quarter of 2013, having made minor changes to the device. Consequently, Google requests a brief extension of the STA, until January 31, 2013, so that it may continue operations pending receipt of authorization. Google also requests approval to make minor changes to the number of devices currently approved at two locations, without changing the total number of devices.
Purpose of Operation
Please explain the purpose of operation:
Testing throughput and stability of home WiFi networks using a next generation personal communication device. Please see Attachment 1 for narrative response.
Information
Callsign:
WF9XKU
Class of Station:
MO
Nature of Service:
Experimental
Requested Period of Operation
Operation Start Date:
11/15/2012
Operation End Date:
01/31/2013
Manufacturer
List below transmitting equipment to be installed (if experimental, so state) if additional rows are required, please submit equipment list as an exhibit:
Manufacturer
Model Number
No. Of Units
Experimental
Google
experimental
722
Yes
Certification
Neither the applicant nor any other party to the application is subject to a denial of Federal benefits that includes FCC benefits pursuant to Section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, 21 U.S.C. Section 862, because of a conviction for possession or distribution of a controlled substance. The applicant hereby waives any claim to the use of any particular frequency or electromagnetic spectrum as against the regulatory power of the United States because of the prvious use of the same, whether by license or otherwise, and requests authorization in accordance with this application. (See Section 304 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.) The applicant acknowledges that all statements made in this application and attached exhibits are considered material representations, and that all the exhibits part hereof and are incorporated herein as if set out in full in this application; undersigned certifies that all statements in this application are true, complete and correct to the best of his/her knowledge and belief and are made in good faith. Applicant certifies that construction of the station would NOT be an action which is likely to have a significant environmental effect. See the Commission's Rules, 47 CFR1.1301-1.1319.
Signature of Applicant (Authorized person filing form):
Aparna Sridhar
Title of Applicant (if any):
Telecom Policy Counsel
Date:
2012-10-31 00:00:00.0
Station Location
City
State
Latitude
Longitude
Mobile
Radius of Operation
Mountain View
California
North 37 25 17
West 122 5 7
Mountain View, CA
322.00
Datum:
NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?
No
Exhibit submitted:
No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?
No
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
2400.00000000-2483.00000000 MHz
MO
N/A 1.000000 W
P
F1D
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
2400.00000000-2483.00000000 MHz
MO
N/A 1.000000 W
P
W7D
City
State
Latitude
Longitude
Mobile
Radius of Operation
Los Angeles
California
North 33 59 43
West 118 28 37
Los Angeles, CA
121.00
Datum:
NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?
No
Exhibit submitted:
No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?
No
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
2400.00000000-2483.00000000 MHz
MO
N/A 1.000000 W
P
F1D
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
2400.00000000-2483.00000000 MHz
MO
N/A 1.000000 W
P
W7D
City
State
Latitude
Longitude
Mobile
Radius of Operation
Cambridge
Massachusetts
North 42 21 46
West 71 5 17
Cambridge, MA
121.00
Datum:
NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?
No
Exhibit submitted:
No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?
No
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
2400.00000000-2483.00000000 MHz
MO
N/A 1.000000 W
P
F1D
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
2400.00000000-2483.00000000 MHz
MO
N/A 1.000000 W
P
W7D
City
State
Latitude
Longitude
Mobile
Radius of Operation
New York
New York
North 40 44 31
West 74 0 16
New York, NY
121.00
Datum:
NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?
No
Exhibit submitted:
No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?
No
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
2400.00000000-2483.00000000 MHz
MO
N/A 1.000000 W
P
F1D
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
2400.00000000-2483.00000000 MHz
MO
N/A 1.000000 W
P
W7D
35876
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC