FWCC Request for Disclosure

0747-EX-PL-2015 Informal Objections

Google Inc.

2016-01-11ELS_171316

  KHKELLER AND HECKMAN LLP
                        Serving Businessthrough Lawand Science*
  1001 G Street, NW.
  Suite 500 West
  Washington, D.C. 20001
  tet 2024344100
  Jas 2024344646
                                                                                             Writer‘s Direct Access
                                                                                             Wesley K. Wright
                                                                                             (202) asa1920
        January 11, 2016                                                                     wright @kh1a w. com

        Filed Electronically

        Ms. Marlene H. Dortch
        Secretary
        Federal Communications Commission
        445 12th Street, SW
        Washington, D.C. 20554

                   Re:       Google Inc. 70/80 GHz Experimental Application
                             FCC File No. 0747—EX—PL—2015

        Dear Ms. Dortch:

                Pursuant to Section 1.41 of the Commission‘s ru]es,l the Fixed Wireless Communications
        Coalition, Inc. (“FWCC")2 submits this letter in response to Google Inc.‘s ("Google") above—
        referenced request for a two—year experimentallicense ("Application")5 The Application seeks
        blanket authority to operate in the 70/80 GHz band at locations throughout the United States.

               The FWCC urges the Commission to require Google to disclose additional technical
        information regarding the company‘s interference mitigation strategy to protect site—based
        incumbent licensees operating in the 70/80 GHz bands.

               The existing rules governing non—Federal use of the 70/80 GHz bands were adopted in
        2003.% These rules require licensees to secure a nationwide license from the Commission and

        147 CFR.§141 (2015).
        * The FWCC is a coalition of companies, associations, and individuals actively involved in the fixed services—L.e.,
        terrestrial fixed microwave communications. Our membership includes manufacturers of microwave equipment,
        fixed microwave engineering firms, licensees of terrestrial fixed microwave systems and their associations, and
        communications service providers and their associations. The membership also includes railroads, public utilities,
        petroleum and pipeline entities, public safety agencies, cable TV providers, backhaul providers, and/or their
        respective associations, communications carriers, and telecommunications attomeys and engineers. Our members
        build, install, and use both licensed and unlicensed point—to—point, point—to—multipoint, and other fixed wireless
        systems, in frequency bands from 900 MHz to 95 GHz. For more information, see www.fwee.us.
        2 See, FCC File No. 0747—EX—PL—2015 ("Application").
        * Allocations of Service Rules for the 71—76 GHz, 81—86 GHz, and 92—95 GHz Bands, WT Docket No. 02—146,
        Report and Order, 18 FCC Red 23318 (rel. Nov. 4, 2003)("Millineter Wave R&O"); 47 C.F.R. §101.1523.




                                   Washington, D.C.    Btussels          San Francisco           Shanghai
This document was delivered lectronically                         wwwkhlaw.com


KELLER AND HECKMAN LLP
      Marlene H. Dortch
      January 11, 2016
      Page 2


      then register individual sites with a third-party database manager.5 As of September 22, 2015,
      there were 408 active licenses and more than 12,500 fixed links registered in the 70/80 GHz
      bands.6 Several FWCC members rely on these bands to support fixed, point-to-point operations.

              The extent to which Google’s proposed operations would impact incumbent licensees in
      these bands is unknown because the Application was heavily redacted. In its Application,
      Google notes that it, “does not seek to withhold from public inspection information necessary for
      interference mitigation.”7 However, the extent to which the Application is redacted makes it
      impossible for incumbent licensees to evaluate whether Google’s interference mitigation strategy
      will protect existing systems.

              For example, the Application claims Google will protect commercial millimeter wave
      band users “as follows: Using data gathered by the GPS receiver [REDACTED], each
      [REDACTED] transmitter will continually communicate its location and velocity to
      [REDACTED]. This information, [REDACTED], allows Google [REDACTED]. This
      predictive analysis is repeated periodically so that [REDACTED].”8 The application also
      includes as Exhibit D the company’s interference mitigation strategy. Unfortunately, Exhibit D
      is redacted in its entirety.9

              The Commission recently recognized the importance of the 70/80 GHz bands to site-
      based incumbents and elected not to allow mobile users to access the 70/80 GHz bands after it
      determined “the coordination process between fixed and mobile operations would be
      considerably more complicated in these bands because there are multiple fixed licensees in a
      given area.”10 In reaching this conclusion, the agency added that, “there was nothing in the
      record to indicate how mobile units would be controlled to avoid interference with fixed links.”11

              Google’s proposed operations present a similar concern. Without more information from
      Google, it is impossible for incumbent licensees to determine how Google’s operations would be
      controlled to avoid interference with fixed links that have been operating for years. Accordingly,
      FWCC urges the Commission to make additional information available so site-based incumbents

      5
          Millimeter Wave R&O at ¶50.
      6
       In re Use of Spectrum Bands above 24 GHz for Mobile Radio Services, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 15-
      138 at ¶82 (rel. Oct. 23, 2015) (“NPRM”).
      7
          Application at p. 1.
      8
          Id at pp. 2-3.
      9
          Id at p. 12.
      10
           NPRM at ¶86.
      11
           Id at ¶87.




This document was delivered electronically.


KELLER AND HECKMAN LLP
  Marlene H. Dortch
  January 11, 2016
  Page 3


      can ensure Google‘s proposed operations would adequately protect their existing systems.~* The
      FWCC is unable to meaningfully comment on the merits of Google‘s Application until such
      additional information is provided.

              Should the Commission have additional questions on this matter, it is requested to contact
      the undersigned.


                                                           Sincerely,


                                                             L. 2C
                                                 ?Wesley K. Wright




      * To limit access to any proprietary or confidential information, the Commission could adopt a Protective Order as
      it has done in other proceedings. See, e.g., In re Petitions for Designation as an Eligible Telecommunications
      Carrier for Purposes of Participation in Mobility Fund Auctions, Protective Order, DA 13—81 (rel. Jan. 22, 2013).




This document was delivered electronically.



Document Created: 2016-01-11 17:43:53
Document Modified: 2016-01-11 17:43:53

© 2025 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC