Google Inc.

0448-EX-ST-2012

Status: Grant Expired Due to New License

WF9XKU
2012-06-01

Documents and Communications: [refresh]

DescriptionCategoryDate
Grant E-mail Notification generated [Jun 2 2012]Correspondence2012-06-02
Attachment 1Text Documents2012-05-31
Application Form:
OET Special Temporary Authority Report
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL TEMPORARY AUTHORITY

Applicant Name
Name of Applicant:  Google Inc.

Address
Attention: Aparna Sridhar
Street Address: 1101 New York Ave. NW, Second Floor
P.O. Box:
City: Washington
State: DC
Zip Code: 20005
Country:
E-Mail Address: [email protected]

Best Contact
Give the following information of person who can best handle inquiries pertaining to this application:  
Last Name: Johnston
First Name: E. Ashton
Title: Lampert, O'Connor & Johnston, P.C.
Phone Number: 202.887.6230

Explanation
Please explain in the area below why an STA is necessary:
On January 26, 2012, Google Inc. (Google) was granted special temporary authority (Call Sign: WF9XKU, File No. 0758-EX-ST-2011) to test a next-generation personal communications device (STA). The STA will expire July 26, 2012. Based on projected milestones, Google anticipates that by August 2012 it will have a fully compliant device ready for submission for FCC equipment authorization pursuant to Sections 2.915, 15.201(b), and 15.247 of the Commissions rules, and in the normal course will obtain authorization shortly thereafter. In order to allow Google to continue testing its device prior to receipt of equipment authorization so that there is no gap between expiration of the current STA and the effective date of equipment certification, and also to expand the scope of its testing, Google seeks to renew and modify the STA for a period beginning on the date of grant of this request and continuing until the earlier of six months thereafter or authorization for the device becomes effective.

Purpose of Operation
Please explain the purpose of operation:  Please see Attachment 1 for narrative response.

Information
Callsign: WF9XKU
Class of Station: MO
Nature of Service: Experimental

Requested Period of Operation
Operation Start Date: 06/15/2012
Operation End Date: 12/15/2012

Manufacturer
List below transmitting equipment to be installed (if experimental, so state) if additional rows are required, please submit equipment list as an exhibit:  
Manufacturer Model Number No. Of Units Experimental
Google experimental 722 Yes

Certification
Neither the applicant nor any other party to the application is subject to a denial of Federal benefits that includes FCC benefits pursuant to Section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, 21 U.S.C. Section 862, because of a conviction for possession or distribution of a controlled substance. The applicant hereby waives any claim to the use of any particular frequency or electromagnetic spectrum as against the regulatory power of the United States because of the prvious use of the same, whether by license or otherwise, and requests authorization in accordance with this application. (See Section 304 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.) The applicant acknowledges that all statements made in this application and attached exhibits are considered material representations, and that all the exhibits part hereof and are incorporated herein as if set out in full in this application; undersigned certifies that all statements in this application are true, complete and correct to the best of his/her knowledge and belief and are made in good faith. Applicant certifies that construction of the station would NOT be an action which is likely to have a significant environmental effect. See the Commission's Rules, 47 CFR1.1301-1.1319.
Signature of Applicant (Authorized person filing form): Aparna Sridhar
Title of Applicant (if any): Telecom Policy Counsel
Date: 2012-05-31 00:00:00.0

Station Location
City State Latitude Longitude Mobile Radius of Operation
Mountain View California North  37  25  17 West  122  5  7 Mountain View, CA 322.00
Datum:  NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?   No
Exhibit submitted:   No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:  
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:  
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:  
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?   No
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:  
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:  
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:  
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 2400.00000000-2483.00000000 MHz MO N/A 1.000000 W P F1D
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 2400.00000000-2483.00000000 MHz MO N/A 1.000000 W P W7D
City State Latitude Longitude Mobile Radius of Operation
Los Angeles California North  33  59  43 West  118  28  37 Los Angeles, CA 121.00
Datum:  NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?   No
Exhibit submitted:   No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:  
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:  
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:  
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?   No
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:  
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:  
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:  
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 2400.00000000-2483.00000000 MHz MO N/A 1.000000 W P F1D
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 2400.00000000-2483.00000000 MHz MO N/A 1.000000 W P W7D
City State Latitude Longitude Mobile Radius of Operation
Cambridge Massachusetts North  42  21  46 West  71  5  17 Cambridge, MA 121.00
Datum:  NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?   No
Exhibit submitted:   No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:  
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:  
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:  
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?   No
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:  
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:  
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:  
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 2400.00000000-2483.00000000 MHz MO N/A 1.000000 W P F1D
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 2400.00000000-2483.00000000 MHz MO N/A 1.000000 W P W7D
City State Latitude Longitude Mobile Radius of Operation
New York New York North  40  44  31 West  74  0  16 New York, NY 121.00
Datum:  NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?   No
Exhibit submitted:   No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:  
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:  
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:  
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?   No
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:  
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:  
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:  
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 2400.00000000-2483.00000000 MHz MO N/A 1.000000 W P F1D
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 2400.00000000-2483.00000000 MHz MO N/A 1.000000 W P W7D

35496
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC