Progress Report (March 02, 1999)

4684-EX-RR-1997 Post Grant Documents

FINAL ANALYSIS INC.

2000-04-12ELS_34949

                                        KELLEY DRYE & WARREN iup
                                    A LIMITEO LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS



                                                   1200 1978 STREET, N.W.

     NEew york, Ny                                           SsUITE 500                                          FAcSIMILE
   LOS ANGELES, CA                                                                                           (202) 9s5—9792
                                                WASHINGTON, D.C. 20036
       MIAM+, FL
      CHICA       IL
          caso,                                             (202) 955—98600
     STAMFORD, CT                                                                                         WRITERS‘ DIRECT LINES

    PARSIPPANY, NJ                                                                                             (202) 955—9771
                                                                                                               (202) 955—9788

  BRUSSELS, BELG(UM                                                                                          wRITERS® E—MaAiLS

      HONG KONG                                                                                           apisciotta@kelleydrye.com
                                                                                                          tdaubert@kelleydrye.com

    AFFILIATE OFFICES

  BANGKOK, THAILAND                                           March 2, 1999
 JAKARTA, INDONESIA
MANILA, THE PHILIPPINES
    MUMBAI, INDIA
     TOKYO, JAPAN




     By HaAND DELIVERY


     Mr. Douglas A. Young
     Federal Communications Commission
     Office of Engineering & Technology
     Experimental Licensing Branch
     2000 M street, N.W., Suite 230
     Mail Stop 1300 — C1
     Washington, D.C. 20554

                        Re:    Final Analysis Inc., Progress Report for Experimental Little LEO
                               Satellite Program — FAISAT—2v Satellite (Call Sign KS2XCY, File
                               No. 4682—EX—R—97); Lanham, Maryland Ground Station (Call Sign
                               WA2XHE, File No. 5582—EX—PL—97); Logan, Utah Ground Station
                               (Call Sign KS2XDA, File No. 4684—EX—RR—97); and Remote
                               Terminals (Call Sign KS2XCZ, File No. 4683—EX—R—97)

     Dear Mr. Young:

                        In accordance with its above—referenced authorizations, Final Analysis Inc.
     ("Final Analysis"), by its attorneys, hereby submits this progress report on its experimental non—
     voice, non—geostationary mobile satellite service ("NVNG MSS" or "Little LEO®") program.

                        On September 23, 1997, Final Analysis‘s experimental Little LEO satellite,
     FAISAT—2v, was successfully launched from Russia. Since the launch of FAISAT—2v, Final
     Analysis‘s technical staff has been actively engaged in monitoring and telemetry, tracking &
     control ("TT&C") of the satellite to ensure that it enters into proper orbital operation. Final
     Analysis made initial full contact with the satellite during early orbit from its main ground
     station and control center at the company headquarters in Lanham, Maryland, and remotely
     through its ground stations in Logan, Utah and Andoya, Norway.


    Mr. Douglas A. Young        KELLEY DRYE & WARREN cur

    March 2, 1999
    Page Two



               The purpose of the experimental satellite is to permit Final Analysis to conduct
multiple scans of a variety of VHF and UHF bands, including the 454—456 and 459—460 MHz
bands allocated to Little LEOs internationally at WRC—95 and WRC—97, from FAISAT—2v.
Final Analysis anticipates that these multiple scanning operations will help collect data on the
comparative levels of noise from existing operations in the observed bands and accurately
measure the feasibility of conducting Little LEO operations in these bands on a time—shared basis
with existing operations.

                After launch of the FAISAT—2v in September the initial early orbit operations of
the satellite were within normal parameters. Data were regularly downloaded during satellite
passes, although the Final Analysis staff was primarily engaged in early orbit operations, i.e.,
fine tuning of the satellite‘s orbital stability, components, and other operational parameters.
These stabilizing activities were not complete when, on October 24, 1997, the satellite entered
into its first solar eclipse and began to expend more energy than could be generated by its solar
panels given the satellite‘s orientation to the sun during eclipse. In anticipation of energy deficit
situations which might occur during normal satellite operations, the satellite command software
was originally programmed to shut the satellite down during defined energy deficit situations.
The satellite performed as programmed and shut down, preventing further ground
communication, and consequent energy drain, during the eclipse period. At the beginning of
1998 when the satellite re—entered full sun mode, the batteries recharged. Final made limited
communication contact with the satellite. However, the satellite operations could not be
improved during the full sun mode, and the satellite continues to shut down again during eclipse
periods.

                 Since resuming limited satellite—ground communications, Final Analysis has
repeatedly tried to complete early orbit operations, including stabilizing the satellite‘s orbit and
fine tuning its other operational parameters.‘ It was, and still is, Final Analysis‘s intention to
upload new software to modify the spacecraft‘s energy use during routine operations and
hopefully prevent future energy deficits during eclipse mode. However, Final Analysis has not
been able to complete early orbit operations or upload the software modification. Consequently,
Final Analysis has continued to encounter operational difficulties and the satellite—ground
communication is limited because FAISAT—2v shuts down and becomes inoperable during
eclipse seasons. FAISAT—2v has recently entered another full sun mode, and Final Analysis has
received special temporary authority to attempt once again to upload the software modification.




1         Final Analysis has received special temporary authority to perform TT&C on the 148.7
          MHz frequency. See Final Analysis STAs, Experimental Call Signs WA2Z2XHE (File
          Nos. S—3064—EX—97 & S—3150—EX—97); and WASXHE (File Nos. S—3329—EX—98 & 0072—
          EX—ST—1999).


Mr. Douglas A. Young           KELLEY DRYE & WARREN uce
March 2, 1999
Page Three



                The original and two copies of this progress report are being filed herewith. In
addition, in accordance with the conditions of Final Analysis‘s experimental authorizations, a
copy of this progress report is being filed with the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau. Please
do not hesitate to call the undersigned counsel at the above—referenced number if you should
have any questions regarding this matter.



                                                 Sincerely,



                                                 Aileen A. Pisciotta
                                                 Todd D. Daubert
                                                 Counsel to Final Analysis Inc.


ce:    Mr. Thomas J. Sugrue,
       Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau (by hand delivery)



Document Created: 2001-07-31 17:18:45
Document Modified: 2001-07-31 17:18:45

© 2025 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC