Request for Confidential Treatment

0804-EX-ST-2017 Text Documents

Ericsson

2017-06-15ELS_193760

                                                                6-15-2017


To the Office of Engineering and Technology:


          Re: Request for confidential treatment for information within Experimental License
          Application, File. No. 0804-EX-ST-2017

        Ericsson respectfully requests that, pursuant to Sections 0.457 and 0.459 of the
Commission’s rules, 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.457 and 0.459, the Commission withhold from public
inspection and accord confidential treatment to the antenna information contained in the
Exhibit to File Number 0804-EX-ST-2017. This information qualifies as trade secrets and
commercial information that falls within Exemption 4 of the Freedom of Information Act
(“FOIA”).1

        Exemption 4 of FOIA provides that the public disclosure requirement of the statute
“does not apply to matters that are . . . (4) trade secrets and commercial or financial
information obtained from a person and privileged or confidential.”2 Ericsson is providing the
trade secrets and commercial information “of a kind that would not customarily be released to
the public” because such disclosure is necessary to obtain an STA. Therefore, this information
is “confidential” under Exemption 4 of FOIA.3 Moreover, Ericsson would suffer substantial
competitive harm if the identified information in our research program were disclosed.4

       In support of this request and pursuant to Section 0.459(b) of the Commission’s rules,5
Ericsson hereby states as follows:

1.        IDENTIFICATION OF THE SPECIFIC INFORMATION FOR WHICH CONFIDENTIAL
          TREATMENT IS SOUGHT6

      Ericsson seeks confidential treatment for the antenna information, which is contained in
      the Exhibit to the application. We have provided a public version of the Exhibit in which
      we have redacted this information.




1
          5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(4).
2
          Id.
3
          See Critical Mass Energy Project v. NRC, 975 F.2d 871, 879 (D.C. Cir. 1992).
4
          See National Parks and Conservation Ass’n v. Morton, 498 F.2d 765 (D.C. Cir. 1974).
5
          47 C.F.R. § 0.459(b).
6
          47 C.F.R. § 0.459(b)(1).




    Ericsson 1776 Eye St. NW, Suite 240 Washington, DC 20006 Ph: +1 202.824.0103
    www.ericsson.com


                                                                                                   2 (4)
                                                         :




2.     DESCRIPTION OF CIRCUMSTANCES GIVING RISE TO THE SUBMISSION7

         Ericsson is submitting an application for authorization for special temporary authority
to test LTE.

3.     EXPLANATION OF THE DEGREE TO WHICH THE INFORMATION IS COMMERCIAL OR
       FINANCIAL, OR CONTAINS A TRADE SECRET OR IS PRIVILEGED8

        The information for which Ericsson seeks confidential treatment contains sensitive
trade secrets and commercial information “which would customarily be guarded from
competitors.”9 Ericsson has invested finances, planning and expertise into developing the
“secret commercially valuable plan” that is the program of research into LTE, and we will use
this research to develop our LTE products. The testing details are part of this plan and that is
not information we would disclose except for the need to obtain the STA.

4.     EXPLANATION OF THE DEGREE TO WHICH THE INFORMATION CONCERNS A
       SERVICE THAT IS SUBJECT TO COMPETITION10

          Developing network products is the core of Ericsson’s business and there continue to
be advancements in LTE that are advancing the next generation of network technology. This
is still being researched and developed. Ericsson faces competition in the US and globally to
develop the best LTE products and services.

5.     EXPLANATION OF HOW DISCLOSURE OF THE INFORMATION COULD RESULT IN
       SUBSTANTIAL COMPETITIVE HARM11

        The release of the plan we are using to research and develop LTE products could
result in competitive harm to Ericsson to the extent it became available to competitors.
Disclosing the information would enable competitors to use and benefit from the investment
Ericsson has made to develop the LTE program of research and to shortcut their own research
processes. It would unjustly benefit our competitors to gain this insight into our research.




7
       47 C.F.R. § 0.459(b)(2).
8
       47 C.F.R. § 0.459(b)(3).
9
       47 C.F.R. § 0.457.
10
       47 C.F.R. § 0.459(b)(4).
11
       47 C.F.R. § 0.459(b)(5).


                                                                                                    3 (4)
                                                         :




6.     IDENTIFICATION OF ANY MEASURES TAKEN BY THE SUBMITTING PARTY TO
       PREVENT UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE12

       The information has been kept within Ericsson and disclosed only to personnel
working on the LTE research, except as discussed in the next section. We have provided a
redacted public exhibit to the application to keep the information confidential.

7.     IDENTIFICATION OF WHETHER THE INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC
       AND THE EXTENT OF ANY PREVIOUS DISCLOSURE OF THE INFORMATION TO THIRD
       PARTIES13

       The information is not available to the public. To the extent this information has been
shared with customer partners as we conduct research, it has been done under a nondisclosure
agreement. Accordingly, Ericsson requests that the Commission accord the information
covered by this Request confidential treatment under Sections 0.457 and 0.459 of the
Commission’s rules.


8.     JUSTIFICATION OF THE PERIOD DURING WHICH THE SUBMITTING PARTY ASSERTS
       THAT MATERIAL SHOULD NOT BE AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE14

        Ericsson requests that the antenna information be treated as confidential for a period of
5 years. We request this time period so that competitors cannot benefit from our research as
the industry develops increasingly advanced technology. By the end of 5 years, research
should have developed to an extent where disclosing this information to the public would not
be a competitive risk.


9.     OTHER INFORMATION THAT ERICSSON BELIEVES MAY BE USEFUL IN ASSESSING
       WHETHER ITS REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIALITY SHOULD BE GRANTED15

       Granting this request for confidentiality is consistent with a policy of supporting
innovation and the investment necessary to conduct research.




12
       47 C.F.R. § 0.459(b)(6).
13
       47 C.F.R. § 0.459(b)(7).
14
       47 C.F.R. § 0.459(b)(8).
15
       47 C.F.R. § 0.459(b)(9).


                                                 4 (4)
          :




Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Kelley A Shields

Kelley A. Shields
Director, Government Affairs and Public Policy



Document Created: 2017-06-15 14:45:04
Document Modified: 2017-06-15 14:45:04

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC