Toggle navigation
FCC.report
IBFS
ELS
FCC ID
Contact
About
FCC.report
›
ELS
›
Comtech Systems, Inc.
›
0467-EX-ST-2010
Comtech Systems, Inc.
0467-EX-ST-2010
Status: Grant Expired Due to New License
WE9XID
2010-10-12
Documents and Communications:
[
refresh
]
Description
Category
Date
Grant E-mail Notification generated [Oct 13, 2010]
Correspondence
2010-10-13
Coordination
Post Grant Documents
2010-12-03
Request for STA and Expedited Processing
Text Documents
2010-09-22
Application Form:
OET Special Temporary Authority Report
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL TEMPORARY AUTHORITY
Applicant Name
Name of Applicant:
Comtech Systems, Inc.
Address
Attention:
Attn: Holland & Knight LLP, C/O Eric Fishman
Street Address:
31 West 52nd Street
P.O. Box:
City:
New York
State:
NY
Zip Code:
10019
Country:
E-Mail Address:
[email protected]
Best Contact
Give the following information of person who can best handle inquiries pertaining to this application:
Last Name:
Fishman
First Name:
Eric
Title:
FCC Legal Counsel to applicant
Phone Number:
212-513-3268
Explanation
Please explain in the area below why an STA is necessary:
See Exhibit 1
Purpose of Operation
Please explain the purpose of operation:
See Exhibit 1
Information
Callsign:
WE9XID
Class of Station:
MO
Nature of Service:
Experimental
Requested Period of Operation
Operation Start Date:
10/20/2010
Operation End Date:
04/20/2011
Manufacturer
List below transmitting equipment to be installed (if experimental, so state) if additional rows are required, please submit equipment list as an exhibit:
Manufacturer
Model Number
No. Of Units
Experimental
Anritsu
68047C
5
No
Certification
Neither the applicant nor any other party to the application is subject to a denial of Federal benefits that includes FCC benefits pursuant to Section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, 21 U.S.C. Section 862, because of a conviction for possession or distribution of a controlled substance. The applicant hereby waives any claim to the use of any particular frequency or electromagnetic spectrum as against the regulatory power of the United States because of the prvious use of the same, whether by license or otherwise, and requests authorization in accordance with this application. (See Section 304 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.) The applicant acknowledges that all statements made in this application and attached exhibits are considered material representations, and that all the exhibits part hereof and are incorporated herein as if set out in full in this application; undersigned certifies that all statements in this application are true, complete and correct to the best of his/her knowledge and belief and are made in good faith. Applicant certifies that construction of the station would NOT be an action which is likely to have a significant environmental effect. See the Commission's Rules, 47 CFR1.1301-1.1319.
Signature of Applicant (Authorized person filing form):
Donna MacDonald
Title of Applicant (if any):
Contracts Manager
Date:
2010-09-21 00:00:00.0
Station Location
City
State
Latitude
Longitude
Mobile
Radius of Operation
Orlando
Florida
North 28 27 21
West 81 25 4
Within 50 km radius of specified centerpoint coordinates
50.00
Datum:
NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?
Yes
Exhibit submitted:
No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:
1.40
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?
No
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
4400.00000000- MHz
MO
20.000000 mW 2.000000 W
P
0.00100000 %
14M0G1D
none
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
4700.00000000- MHz
MO
20.000000 mW 2.000000 W
P
0.00100000 %
14M0G1D
none
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
4935.00000000- MHz
MO
20.000000 mW 2.000000 W
P
0.00100000 %
14M0G1D
none
City
State
Latitude
Longitude
Mobile
Radius of Operation
Huntsville
Alabama
North 34 41 37
West 86 42 38
Within 50 km radius of specified centerpoint coordinates
50.00
Datum:
NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?
Yes
Exhibit submitted:
No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:
1.40
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?
No
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
4400.00000000- MHz
MO
20.000000 mW 2.000000 W
P
0.00100000 %
14M0G1D
none
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
4700.00000000- MHz
MO
20.000000 mW 2.000000 W
P
0.00100000 %
14M0G1D
none
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
4935.00000000- MHz
MO
20.000000 mW 2.000000 W
P
0.00100000 %
14M0G1D
none
City
State
Latitude
Longitude
Mobile
Radius of Operation
Silver Springs
Nevada
North 39 18 10
West 119 21 23
Within 50 km radius of specified centerpoint coordinates
50.00
Datum:
NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?
Yes
Exhibit submitted:
No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:
1.40
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?
No
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft:
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
4400.00000000- MHz
MO
20.000000 mW 2.000000 W
P
0.00100000 %
14M0G1D
none
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
4700.00000000- MHz
MO
20.000000 mW 2.000000 W
P
0.00100000 %
14M0G1D
none
Action
Frequency
Station Class
Output Power/ERP
Mean Peak
Frequency Tolerance (+/-)
Emission Designator
Modulating Signal
New
4935.00000000- MHz
MO
20.000000 mW 2.000000 W
P
0.00100000 %
14M0G1D
none
33337
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC