Exhibit to Experimental License Application

0355-EX-PL-2007 Text Documents

Arizona Public Service Company

2007-07-20ELS_82727

                 EXHIBIT TO EXPERIMENTAL LICENSE APPLICATION

A.        Background.

Communication inside and around a nuclear reactor is a great challenge, not only because the walls
can range in width from 4 inches to 4 feet of concrete and the built-in shielding of the reactor dome
tends to serve as a deflector of certain wireless communications, but also because the need for
reliable and effective communication is so critical. Under Nuclear Regulatory Commission (“NRC”)
rules, licensed plants have the regulatory and licensing obligation to “make every reasonable effort to
maintain exposure to radiation as far below NRC-established dose limits as is practical . . . (see 10
C.F.R. § 20.1003 et seq.) in order to protect plant workers from harmful doses of radiation (e.g.,
while they perform safety and maintenance operations in and around the nation’s nuclear plants).

As set forth more thoroughly in the Consensus Plan between the Nuclear Energy Institute, the
Utilities Telecom Council and leading broadcaster organizations (“Broadcasters”) (attached hereto),
the commercial nuclear industry’s use of certain Telex wireless intercom equipment (the
“Equipment”) serves the twin objectives of effective communication and protecting workers by
limiting their exposure to radiation by providing communications features (wireless, hands-free, full
duplex/multi-user, reliable, no “call drops,” no background noise, no inadvertent actuation,
uninterrupted voice transmission, ease of use, and durability) that permit plant workers to efficiently
conduct routine maintenance as well as activities required to be performed in an ”outage” (when
used (irradiated) fuel is replaced with fresh (non-irradiated) fuel and the used fuel is carefully moved
to storage facilities). That is, the Equipment directly contributes to the protection of the health and
safety of plant workers, as efficiencies gained from its use limit nuclear plant workers’ occupational
exposure.

B.        Consensus Plan Provisions.

The terms and conditions under which the plants may continue to use the Equipment are set forth
in the Consensus Plan.

Under the Consensus Plan, the plants are obliged to coordinate use of the Equipment outdoors and
to report within 6 months of the grant of each experimental license, and every 12 months thereafter,
on the plants’ use of the Equipment. In addition, NEI and UTC are required to update the
Broadcasters on efforts to identify or develop equipment that operates in Part 90, or other
frequencies, for which plants are eligible, and which is capable of satisfying the plants’
communication and safety needs.

C.        Proposed Experiments.

The plants intend to conduct experiments using the Equipment through which they will establish a
series of situational communications objectives within and around the plant and track the operating
performance benchmarks for each objective. As alternative equipment becomes available, the plants
will conduct tests of such prospective equipment against the benchmarks established using the
Equipment.

The specific objectives to be accomplished:




4890322


          1. Prioritization of the operating features of the Equipment in order to inform our RFP on
             replacement equipment.

          2. Establishing performance benchmarks and power matrix in order to inform our RFP.

          3. Evaluating new entrants against the priorities and benchmarks established using the
             Equipment.

          4. Creation of best practices generally for communicating in and around the nuclear plants,
             both with the Equipment and other equipment and methods.

          5. Of particular interest is the simultaneous operation in many of the plants of the
             Equipment and the electronic dosimeters, most of which operate at 2.4 GHz. Electronic
             dosimeters are worn by many plant employees while they participate in operations
             involving exposure to radiation. The dosimeter device measures the dose in real time
             and transmits the readings back to the communications control center, which is also the
             venue from which the safety experts communicate, via the Equipment, with the plant
             employees. In fact, it is often the case that the communication via the Equipment is to
             instruct the plant worker to move one way or another, in order to avoid areas where the
             dosimeter indicates there exists high doses of radiation.

             While the simultaneous use of the Equipment with the 2.4 GHz dosimeter devices has
             not caused interference to either device (or, worse, caused one or both to shut down),
             the experiment will allow certain plants to test other equipment operating at the 2.4 GHz
             band to evaluate whether it can operate simultaneously with the dosimeter device. It will
             be important to experiment on the best practices for such simultaneous operation and to
             determine, as best one can, how far apart on the spectrum chart these often
             simultaneous transmissions must be, in order to avoid interference/shut-down.

The program of experimentation contemplated herein has a reasonable promise of contributing to
the development, extension, expansion or utilization of the radio frequency because there has not
previously been a full study of best communications practices inside and around nuclear plants.
This fact, together with the NRC mandates and the compelling desire to protect plant workers by
limiting their exposure to radiation, will also contribute to the development of alternative equipment
that is capable of operating under Part 90 and meeting the plants’ safety and communications needs.

As such, these experiments will facilitate the plants’ efforts to fulfill the intentions of the Consensus
Plan for the plants to cease their use of the Equipment no later than February 2009.




4890322



Document Created: 2007-07-20 17:24:31
Document Modified: 2007-07-20 17:24:31

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC