Alcatel-Lucent

0188-EX-ST-2011

Status: Grant Expired Due to New License

WE9XVK
2011-04-05

Documents and Communications: [refresh]

DescriptionCategoryDate
Grant E-mail Notification generated [Apr 6, 2011]Correspondence2011-04-06
Antenna MastImages2011-03-18
Letter from PSSTText Documents2011-03-28
Application Form:
OET Special Temporary Authority Report
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL TEMPORARY AUTHORITY

Applicant Name
Name of Applicant:  Alcatel-Lucent

Address
Attention: Michael McMenamin
Street Address: 1100 New York Avenue, NW, Suite 640 West
P.O. Box:
City: Washington
State: DC
Zip Code: 20005
Country:
E-Mail Address: [email protected]

Best Contact
Give the following information of person who can best handle inquiries pertaining to this application:  
Last Name: McMenamin
First Name: Michael
Title: Senior Director
Phone Number: 703-307-4920

Explanation
Please explain in the area below why an STA is necessary:
The requested experimental STA is for April 10-20, 2011 for use in the City of Baltimore, Maryland. The expedited request for use of the public safety spectrum space in the 700 MHz Band 14 spectrum space, 758-768/788-798 MHz, is warranted as the proposed demonstration with the Maryland Transportation Authority Police (?MTAP?) will promote the ?safety of life, health, or property? of the citizens of the United States. In addition, the Public Safety Spectrum Trust, the broadband licensee of the aforementioned spectrum space, will be filing a letter of concurrence allowing Alcatel-Lucent to use this space for the period requested above.

Purpose of Operation
Please explain the purpose of operation:  Demonstration The proposed demonstration will promote the ?safety of life, health, or property? of the United States by demonstrating the applicability of commercially developed technology (LTE ? Long Term Evolution) to address public safety broadband requirements. The demonstration with the MTAP will highlight the use of high-definition video conferencing between two patrol cars in a simulated field environment. The use of voice and video over LTE will increase the speed and precision of the critical decision making process. In addition, the use of commercially available technology that meets public safety requirements will further serve the public interests by lowering acquisition costs, and demonstrating the readiness of LTE to meet the requirements of the spectrum currently assigned to public safety.

Information
Callsign: WE9XVK
Class of Station: MO
Nature of Service: Experimental

Requested Period of Operation
Operation Start Date: 04/10/2011
Operation End Date: 04/20/2011

Manufacturer
List below transmitting equipment to be installed (if experimental, so state) if additional rows are required, please submit equipment list as an exhibit:  
Manufacturer Model Number No. Of Units Experimental
Alcatel-Lucent 9412 1 No

Certification
Neither the applicant nor any other party to the application is subject to a denial of Federal benefits that includes FCC benefits pursuant to Section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, 21 U.S.C. Section 862, because of a conviction for possession or distribution of a controlled substance. The applicant hereby waives any claim to the use of any particular frequency or electromagnetic spectrum as against the regulatory power of the United States because of the prvious use of the same, whether by license or otherwise, and requests authorization in accordance with this application. (See Section 304 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.) The applicant acknowledges that all statements made in this application and attached exhibits are considered material representations, and that all the exhibits part hereof and are incorporated herein as if set out in full in this application; undersigned certifies that all statements in this application are true, complete and correct to the best of his/her knowledge and belief and are made in good faith. Applicant certifies that construction of the station would NOT be an action which is likely to have a significant environmental effect. See the Commission's Rules, 47 CFR1.1301-1.1319.
Signature of Applicant (Authorized person filing form): Michael McMenamin
Title of Applicant (if any): Director
Date: 2011-03-18 00:00:00.0

Station Location
City State Latitude Longitude Mobile Radius of Operation
Baltimore Maryland North  39  16  40 West  76  38  19 Maryalnd Transit Authority Faciltiy 1.50
Datum:  NAD 83
Is a directional antenna (other than radar) used?   Yes
Exhibit submitted:   No
(a) Width of beam in degrees at the half-power point:   65.00
(b) Orientation in horizontal plane:  
(c) Orientation in vertical plane:  
Will the antenna extend more than 6 meters above the ground, or if mounted on an existing building, will it extend more than 6 meters above the building, or will the proposed antenna be mounted on an existing structure other than a building?   Yes
(a) Overall height above ground to tip of antenna in meters:   15.00
(b) Elevation of ground at antenna site above mean sea level in meters:   300.00
(c) Distance to nearest aircraft landing area in kilometers:   8.00
(d) List any natural formations of existing man-made structures (hills, trees, water tanks, towers, etc.) which, in the opinion of the applicant, would tend to shield the antenna from aircraft: MTA Facility
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 758.00000000-768.00000000 MHz MO 40.000000 W 40.000000 W P 10M0X2X FDD
Action Frequency Station Class Output Power/ERP Mean Peak Frequency Tolerance (+/-) Emission Designator Modulating Signal
New 788.00000000-798.00000000 MHz MO 40.000000 W 40.000000 W P 10M0X2X FDD

16514

© 2026 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC