AC4 FCC STA operation extension

0153-EX-ST-2013 Text Documents

Aerospace Corporation, THE

2013-02-22ELS_133736

THE RF TECHNICAL DETAILS IN THIS GRANT REQUEST ARE IDENTICAL TO
THOSE IN THE GRANT 0423-EX-ST-2012.

AeroCube-4 test.

The purpose of the operation is to conduct research regarding the space application of
microelectronic technologies. The operation includes a demonstration of principles of the
physics of the low-earth-orbit space environment and its effects on microelectronics.
Three AeroCube-4 satellites comprise this flight to study the physics of formation flying.

The AeroCube-4 is a PICOSAT class satellite, weighs less than 1.3 KG and is 4x4x4
inches in dimension (see “satellite design” Exhibit). It is being launched on NROL-36,
slated for August 2, 2012- but it may slip. The orbit is 490 x 778 km with 66 degree
inclination. Orbital debris analysis predicts a lifetime between 12.3 and 21.2 years (see
“orbit lifetime” Exhibit).

The AeroCube-4 satellite has two radios for redundancy. The first is the “tried-and-true”
Freewave Technologies, Inc. FGRM radio inside which outputs 2 Watts. It has a fixed
frequency (i.e. not hopping or spread spectrum) at 914.7 MHz (see “Freewave
bandwidth” Exhibit) so that the ground station can quickly link up with the satellite rather
than waiting for the hopping sequence to sync up. The second radio is called the
AdvRadio that is built by The Aerospace Corporation around a Texas Instruments
CC1101 transceiver chip. It also operates at a fixed 914.7 MHz frequency (see
“AdvRadio bandwidth” Exhibit) and outputs 1.5W. The satellite chooses which radio to
use - both are not used at the same time. Both radios attach to separate omni-directional
patch antennas on the AeroCube-4. We have the pattern calculated and tested but use -
10dB as the gain for 90% of the sphere area (see “satellite antenna pattern” Exhibit).

When the AeroCube-4 satellite is ejected, it will power-on. However the radio will be in
receive-mode only. As the satellite flies over a ground station, the station will be
continuously beaconing upwards towards the satellite. When the satellite radio hears the
beacon, along with the proper serial number code, it will respond and a link will be
established. At that point, the ground station will ask the satellite for whatever
information it wants typically state of health log files, images from the cameras or other
onboard telemetry.       The satellite will respond by down-loading the requested
information. When the link is lost due to the satellite passing out of view while the
satellite was transmitting, the satellite will try 256 times to complete the last packet
transmitted. If each packet is 72 bytes long and the radio data rate is 38.4 Kbaud, then it
will try for only a couple of seconds before the 256 attempts are exceeded. At that point
the satellite will go back into a passive receive mode again and again wait for the next
beacon from a ground station with the correct serial number.

We would like to use two types of ground stations to communicate with the AeroCube-4
satellite. The first is a fixed 16” dish antenna at The Aerospace Corporation in El
Segundo, CA, near LAX airport. It has 30 dB gains, 5 deg beam width and also would


use a 2W Freewave FGRM radio or an AdvRadio on the feed horn. The second ground
station is a portable 2-meter diameter dish. This has 22 dB gain, a 10 deg beam width
and would use a Freewave FGRM radio or an AdvRadio with the output passed through a
9 W amplifier. This portable station we would like to use somewhere that is RF quiet and
also advantageously located for maximum satellite coverage. A typical satellite pass is 5
minutes long, twice per day - so the system spends a lot of time not in use. We
requesting approval for the same remote locations already approved in STA 0423-EX-
ST-2012.

We are requesting an extension because the satellites have not completed their primary
mission objectives. We predict they can complete their mission in an additional 6
months.



Document Created: 2013-02-21 13:23:33
Document Modified: 2013-02-21 13:23:33

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC