Exhibits 1 & 2

5843-EX-PL-1997 Text Documents

AT&T; CORPORATION

1999-04-14ELS_4896

AT&T Corp. FCC Form 442 Item 4 Exhibit 1

{and3no0) mo0s NoNR O (3nd3no) noos sEvooxs OR (3nd3no) moos ezvooxs O (2ndgno) moos sE40X9T OR *5000 °0 (and3no) moos ezaoxst O 000£0°8§T —~000 44‘ LST (andano) moZ #EaoX9T OK (andgnc) mor szaoxst OR £5000 °0 (and3no} moz 4* ararzot OK DO9FL * LST (andano) MoZ EEA0X9T OR (andgno) moZ @raoust O *5000 °0 (3nd3no) mo? szazrxot OR 000v8®*TST {andgno) moz ZE40X9T OR (2ndano) mor °*‘ azaoust OX *5000 °0 (andgno) mort* C @razxot OR oores*Ist (and3n0} moos NoR OR (3ndano} moos aevooxs O (2nd3no) moos azvooxs OK (2ndano) moos sEadX9Tt OK *5000 °0 (and3no) moos ezaoxst OK 000T8®IST ~000T§°TST (2ndano} moZ scaorst OW {3ndgno} morz szaoust oK *5000 °0 (3nd3no} moz @razxot oK 0o98y‘IST (3nd3no} moos NoX on (2ndgno) moos #evooss on {andgno} moos ezvooxs on (3nd3no) moos SE40X9T on *200‘0 (3ndano} moos azaoxst oK 00099°£¢ ~000I2‘EF (3ndgno} KOOT 114 a 4 5 cRON OK (indife) MGOT EE¥OOXS on (and3no0) M00T @I¥O0N$ on {and3no) M00T SEA0XST on %200‘0 {2ndano) MOOT ezaoxst o 00091‘ E€¥ (andgno) mo05s NOR oK A (2ndano) moos aEvooxs on (32nd3no) moos ervooxs on (3nd3no) woos EEZ4OX$T on *200 * 0 (and3no) M005 SZADMST ox 00099°St ~000zt‘§t 9"?"?“” MOOT ; ., _ NOK old {andano) woot 0~"dégowot on %200 °0 (2ndano) mo0Tt =_ ~~ez40X5T OR 00091°St (reAancy c g C <— C ZHH (—/+) " #33@m femog zojeubtseq u;§ sourzeroL pertsouany uotes tug serto Aouenbeaa

Frequency Class Emission Authorized Tolerance Stn Designator Power watts (+/—) MHz 2,F +4 158.09400 mo io0r2r2e,}9" °_ 20w (output) 0.0005% MO 15KOFP2B 20W (output) MO 16KOF3E 20W (output) 158.10000 mo 10K2r2si0F9° 20w (output) 0.0005% MO 15KOF2B 20W (output) MO 16KOFP3R 20W (output) 454.37500— 454 .45000 MO 6KOOA2B 600% (output) 0.0005% MO 6KOOA3E 600# (output) MO 8OKOFP2B 600# {output) MO 8OKOFPIE 600¥ (output) MO NON 600% (output) 454 .45000— 454 .97500 MO 6KOOA2B 600# (output) 0.0005% MO 6KOOA3E 600# (output) Mo 8OKOP2B 600# (output) MO 80KOP3E 600W% (output) MO NON 600# {output) 459.37500 — 459.45000 MO 6KOOA2B 600# (output) 0.0005% MO 6KOOA3E _« ,§00W (output) o soxor2as }>‘ goow (output) Mo 80KOFIE | 600# (output) MO NON 600# (output) 459.45000— 459.97500 MO 6KOOA2B 600¥ (output) 0.0005% MO 6KOOA3E 600% (output) MO 80KOF2B 600¥ (output) MO 8OROF3E 600# {output) MO NOH 600# {output) 824.00000— is C in c pma LCC 849.00000 MO 30KODXW 12W (KRP) % Mo 30KOF2B,.),,,, 12W (ERP) es ass MO 30KOFP3® 12W (ERP] «: rojig/f 0w 0C M0 NOM., 30800. 12M, r‘rfi’ | FX 30KODXN 300W ( ) FX 3OKOF2B _ 300W (BRP) Porapo D — * PX 30xrGri% 300W (ZRP) PX 30KOP7TW 300W (ERP) FX NON 300NW (ERP) 869.00000— o 1 m eLrd sw es er 2 894.00000 MO 30RODXN 12W (ERP) * MO 30KO®P2B,. ,,,, 12W. (ERP) MO 30KROP3E 12W (ERP) hesd 3 Z ) P41 2y y

Frequency Class Emission Authorized Tolerance Designator Power watts (+/—) Stn MHz MO NONQ; oi w ; 128‘g RP) 2X FX idxopx« " sbow (Enp) FX §9KOF2B > 300W (ERP) FX iorogis 7 soow (gkp)| FX 30KOFTW 300W (ERP) FX NON 300W (ERP) 1850.00000— 1990.00000___ MO 10M0A7W })z;x ,(’O:ltp‘lxt“) p6) % . \OYMA’N 2110.00000— 84 m 2 Sn n w * 2130.00000 MO 10MOPFLB 4K (output) 0.001% MO 10M0F2B 4K (output) Mo 10MOF7B 4K (output) MOo 10M0F8E 4K (output) 9 .. Mo NON 4K (output) f(£130.00000- 2150.00000 Mo 8OOKaA7W 32K (ggtggq) % 2180.00000— MO 800KA7TW 32K (output) % " 2200.00000 C e =*+k c¢rec> 3700.00000— Mo 20M0F2B 20W {output) %s 4200.00000 mo 20M0F38 20W (output) xo zonor7!/_);fl57¥§6w (output) MO 20M0P8W 20W {output) mo NON 20W (output) hn 5925.00000— {output) % 6575.00000 Mo 30M0F2B 20W MO 30M0F3E 20W {output) MO 30MOF3F 20W (output) Mo 30M0P7W 20W (output) MO 30M0F3W 20W {output) Mo won 20W (output) se 2 6525.00000— e m2t ]'f:"‘r) 6875.00000 10m0a7Y 100® (output) ~~ % /) 20M0A7N 100K (oucPut)g 10550.00000— Lkd the P F8 esc in20W n{output} ) * ; 10680.00000 SHOO!BW 20W {output) _ . aw , nl2" NON dome Pb d o‘ ame rep, 4 9m0C e =4 * 10700.00000— 50W {output) 0 .05% 11700.00000 40M0r7W 17700.00000— 220MF1B 20W {output) % 19400.00000 220MF2B 20¥ .loutput) 220MFP3E 20W (output) 220MF7B 20W {output) a3m Japw V i4

(andano} MOT NOR OR % (andano) MOT MSYORST OR co000°00TEZ ~00000°008TZ (3ndano} mOZ NON OM ¢» iIL(fl:;gn}:!:u:‘oc)‘f mor, MBanoTZ OK 8ou * "{andafko)~ mbz~" "°~" gramore OX (and3no) moZ HEAMOTZ OR (andgno) moZ HZIROZT OR % (3ind3no) moZ @TAROTE OR 00000 °00461 ~00000°00f6t {and3no} mOZ NOR OR (3nd3no) moZ MBAKOTZ OR (~/*) sq27ra zemod zojvubtseq us ecurcetorp pezrfsoy3ny uotes turg s#¥TO Aouenbeas

AT&T Corp. FCC Form 442 Items 4 & 10 Exhibit 2 The instant application requests an experimental license to enable AT&T Corp. ("AT&T") to engage in experiments to test RF equipment, RF propagation, new and developing technologies (as well as enhancements to existing technologies) and services. The application proposes the use of a wide variety of frequency bands, modulation techniques and power levels. Depending on the experiment in question, the tests may be conducted in numerous and varied locations thereby necessitating that the experimental license be granted for nationwide use. As the largest telecommunications company in the world, AT&T is constantly engaged in the process of developing and testing technologies for suitability for new services to ensure that innovative and competitive services can be commercially deployed at the earliest possible time to the benefit of the public. It should be noted that this application for an experimental authorization is identical to Experimental License KB2XTG, currently licensed to Lucent Technologies ("Lucent").‘ When Lucent was spun off from AT&T it was the intention of the parties that both AT&T and Lucent would retain sets of experimental licenses so they could independently continue to engage in experimental testing in a wide variety of frequency bands, using different power levels and modulation techniques. Due to an inadvertent oversight, the licenses were fully assigned to Lucent rather than a duplicate set oflicenses being obtained by AT&T and Lucent." In order to enable AT&T to continue to engage in experimentaltesting to bring new and innovative services to the public and to remedy the inadvertent oversight that was committed when Lucent was spun off from AT&T, AT&T submits that grant of the instant application would serve the public interest, convenience and necessity. ‘ Contemporaneous with the filing of this application, AT&T is submitting eight others based on similar circumstances. 2 "Duplicate" sets of licenses were issued at various times since the AT&T divestiture in 1984, such as for example, when BellCore and AT&T became independent.


Document Created: 2001-08-25 14:30:40
Document Modified: 2001-08-25 14:30:40
© 2025 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC