E-mail Response

0163-EX-RR-2001 Text Documents

AT&T; CORP.

2001-09-18ELS_48638

Dear John Kennedy,

I have asked the Division Manager at AT&T's Shannon Labs to help explain why
the license needs to be nationwide.
His response is below. If you will not agree to option 1, will I need to
do a new 405 request? If I need to do a new
form can I request all five location on the one call sign or will each site
need a separate call sign?
Please advise.

Dawn

-----Original Message-----
From: Rice, Christopher W (Chris), ALRES
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 10:03 AM
To: Hardt, Dawn D, NPONS
Subject: RE: Nationwide Justification for WA2XOI

Dawn,

We can try two things.

OPTIONS:
1) The reason for a nationwide license is the following: The technology
that we are developing is low-power indoor/campus wireless systems. We
would like to be able to demonstrate this technology at AT&T customer
locations as the need arises. These demonstrations would typically last
less than a few days. As you know, AT&T customers are worldwide, but for
this service, we envision customers at locations anywhere within the United
States. For this reason, we would request the nationwide experimental
license.

2) Specific Locations: Florham Park, NJ; Middletown, NJ; Bedminster, NJ;
Basking Ridge, NJ; Menlo Park, CA. These locations correspond to AT&T Labs
and AT&T Corporate offices.

Option 1) is preferred. It is much easier to convince a customer of a
demonstration if they do not have to travel. Option 2) would require the
customer to come to us; this is a marketing/sales disadvantage, but it is
better than no license.

I hope this helps.

Sincerely,

Chris Rice

-----Original Message-----
From: Hardt, Dawn D, NPONS
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 9:52 AM
To: Rice, Christopher W (Chris), ALRES
Subject: FW: Nationwide Justification for WA2XOI

Chris,
Help.......... Can you please write up something for me to give them, or
should we ask for several locations?
Dawn

-----Original Message-----
From: John Kennedy [mailto:JKENNEDY@fcc.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 9:41 AM
To: Hardt, Dawn D, NPONS
Subject: Nationwide Justification for WA2XOI

Dear Ms. Dawn Hardt:

Thank you for your timely reply to my e-mail. We do need more specific
information pertaining to the need for a nationwide experimental license.
The question which we are contemplating is, "Why can't an experimental
license be requested for specific sites as the need arises?". Please
provide a more detailed reason than the one in exhibit 1. Thank you.

Sincerely,

John W. Kennedy

Document Created: 2001-09-18 14:58:54
Document Modified: 2001-09-18 14:58:54

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC