Request for Confidential Treatment

0281-EX-CR-2019 Text Documents

3DB Communication Inc.

2019-05-16ELS_230133

                                                               Hogan Lovells US LLP
                                                               Columbia Square
                                                               555 Thirteenth Street, NW
                                                               Washington, DC 20004
                                                               T +1 202 637 5600
                                                               F +1 202 637 5910
                                                               www.hoganlovells.com




May 16, 2019

VIA ELECTRONIC FILING

Marlene H. Dortch
Secretary
Federal Communications Commission
445 12th Street N.W.
Washington, DC 20554

Re: Request for Confidential Treatment, File No. 0281-EX-CR-2019, Application for Renewal of
Experimental License File No. 0025-EX-CM-2019

Dear Ms. Dortch:

        Pursuant to the provisions of Sections 0.457 and 0.459 of the Commission’s rules governing
the submission of confidential materials,1 3DB Communication Inc. (“3DB”) respectfully requests that
the entire scope of its test plan included in the attached renewal application be afforded confidential
treatment and not be placed in the Commission’s public files. 3DB is providing this information to
the Commission in the attached exhibits to accompany its application, File No. 0281-EX-CR-2019:
Exhibit 1: Confidential Executive Summary – Description of the Experiment; Exhibit 3: Confidential
Azimuth and Elevation Antenna Patterns; Exhibit 4: Confidential Request for Authority to Conduct
Product Development and Market Trial Operations (collectively, the “Confidential Exhibits”). The
confidential information qualifies as “commercial or financial information” that “would customarily be
guarded from competitors” regardless of whether or not such materials are protected from disclosure
by a privilege, is closely held by 3DB, is not available to the public, and not revealed except under
cover of confidentiality.2 3DB therefore requests that the Commission “not permit the inspection” of
these materials.3

       In support of this request and pursuant to 47 C.F.R. § 0.459(b), 3DB makes its request for
confidential treatment based on the following information:

       1. 3DB seeks confidential treatment for the entire scope, specifications, and objectives of the
experiments to be conducted under this application as described in the Confidential Exhibits.

1
    47 C.F.R. §§ 0.457, 0.459.
2
  See 47 C.F.R. § 0.457(d); Critical Mass Energy Project v. NRC, 975 F.2d 871, 879 (D.C. Cir. 1992)
(“[W]e conclude that financial or commercial information provided to the Government on a voluntary
basis is ‘confidential’ for the purpose of Exemption 4 if it is of a kind that would customarily not be
released to the public by the person from whom it was obtained.”).
3
    47 C.F.R. § 0.451.


Marlene H. Dortch
May 16, 2019



      2. The confidential information in the Confidential Exhibits is being submitted to the
Commission to assist in the review of the attached renewal application.

        3. The information regarding 3DB’s proposed experiments and equipment in the Confidential
Exhibits is privileged commercial information and is restricted solely to 3DB.

        4. The market for high frequency communications is innovative, fast-developing, and
competitive. 3DB’s business developing communication modes and equipment that enhance the
performance elements of high frequency communications is subject to competition from other
device, software, and network developers.

        5. Due to the competitive nature of 3DB’s business, disclosure of information about its test
plans would result in substantial competitive harm to 3DB. Knowledge of 3DB’s technologies and
specifications of its testing plan would allow competitors to infer or confirm information about 3DB’s
business strategy of which they are currently unaware or uncertain, and could jeopardize the
competitive position of 3DB.

       6. 3DB strictly limits to 3DB employees information about the technologies and test plans
described in the Confidential Exhibits.

        7. Information about 3DB’s technologies and test plans disclosed in the Confidential Exhibits
is not publicly available.

        8. 3DB requests that the proprietary information be withheld from disclosure for an indefinite
period, at a minimum the entire duration of the experimental license.

        9. The high frequency communication market is competitive and fast-growing. The timing
and progress of 3DB’s product research and development process, and its ability to maintain the
confidentiality of its test plans, will substantially contribute to the success of its product launch. The
premature disclosure of 3DB’s innovative technologies and test plan described in the Confidential
Exhibits would harm the competitive position of 3DB.

         Additionally, 3DB notes that a denial of its request would impair the Commission’s ability to
obtain this type of voluntarily disclosed information in the future, hindering the agency’s application
review process. Encouraging cooperation with the government by parties having information useful
to officials and enhancing a government agency’s ability to obtain confidential information are the
legislative intent for developing exemptions from the Freedom of Information Act.4 The U.S. Court of
Appeals for the D.C. Circuit has recognized a “private interest in preserving the confidentiality of
information that is provided to the Government on a voluntary basis.”5

        3DB is submitting the Confidential Exhibits, which provide information regarding the
specifications of the experiments to be conducted under this application. 3DB requests that the
4
  See Critical Mass Energy Project v. NRC, 975 F.2d 871, 878 (D.C. Cir. 1992) (“Where, however,
the information is provided to the Government voluntarily, the presumption is that [the Government’s]
interest will be threatened by disclosure as the persons whose confidences have been betrayed will,
in all likelihood, refuse further cooperation.”); see also Ctr. for Auto Safety v. Nat'l Highway Traffic
Safety Admin., 244 F.3d 144, 147-48 (D.C. Cir. 2001).
5
    Critical Mass Energy Project, 975 F.2d at 879.



                                                     2


Marlene H. Dortch
May 16, 2019


Commission return these submissions if its request for confidentiality is denied.6 Please direct any
questions to the undersigned.



                                                       Respectfully submitted,

                                                       _/s/ Sarah K. Leggin

                                                       Sarah K. Leggin
                                                       Counsel to 3DB Communication Inc.




6
    See 47 C.F.R. § 0.459(e).



                                                  3



Document Created: 2019-05-16 16:38:10
Document Modified: 2019-05-16 16:38:10

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC