2014-11-28 Reply to

REPLY submitted by DISH Operating L.L.C.

2014-11-28 Reply to Opp of DISH Operating LLC

2014-11-28

This document pretains to SAT-LOA-20140825-00094 for Application to Launch and Operate on a Satellite Space Stations filing.

IBFS_SATLOA2014082500094_1070094

                                       Before the
                         FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
                                  Washington, DC 20554


                                                    )
In the Matter of                                    )
                                                    )
DIRECTV Enterprises, LLC                            )    File No. SAT-LOA-20140825-00094
                                                    )    Call Sign S2930
Application for Authorization to Launch and         )
Operate DIRECTV 15 at 103º W.L.                     )
                                                    )


                     DISH OPERATING L.L.C REPLY TO OPPOSITION OF
                              DIRECTV ENTERPRISES, LLC

          Pursuant to Section 25.154(d) of the Commission’s rules,1 DISH Operating L.L.C.

(“DISH”) submits this reply to the opposition of DIRECTV Enterprises, LLC (“DIRECTV”) to

DISH’s petition to deny or defer (“Petition”)2 DIRECTV’s above-captioned application (the

“DIRECTV 15 Application”) for authority to launch and operate the DIRECTV 15 satellite on

Ka-band Fixed Satellite Service (“FSS”) frequencies at the nominal 103º W.L. orbital location.3

          In support of its Petition,4 DISH noted that the International Bureau (“Bureau”) earlier

this year granted similar relief in response to DIRECTV’s petition to deny or defer the

application of SES Americom, Inc. (“SES Americom”) for authority to operate the SES-3




1
 47 C.F.R. § 25.154(d); see also Policy Branch Information: Satellite Space Applications Accepted for
Filing, Public Notice, Report No. SAT-01043 (Oct. 3, 2014).
2
 See DISH, Petition to Deny or Defer, IBFS File No. SAT-LOA-20140825-00094 (Nov. 3, 2014) (“DISH
Petition”).
3
 The proposed DIRECTV 15 satellite will carry a 17/24 GHz Broadcasting-Satellite Service (“BSS”)
payload in addition to a Ka-band FSS payload and a 12/17 GHz Direct Broadcast Satellite (“DBS”)
payload. See DIRECTV, Application for Authority to Launch and Operate DIRECTV 15, IBFS File No.
SAT-LOA-20140825-00094, Narrative at 1 n.1 (Aug. 25, 2014) (“DIRECTV 15 Application”).
4
    See DISH Petition at 2.


satellite on C- and Ku-band frequencies at 103º W.L.5 Specifically, even though no objections

were raised against SES Americom’s proposed C- and Ku-band operations, the Bureau

nonetheless deferred action on the proposal in order to provide time for Ciel Satellite Limited

Partnership and DIRECTV to coordinate their 17/24 GHz BSS payloads at 103º W.L.6

        Despite the similarities and shared set of facts between the two cases, DIRECTV asks the

Commission to ignore the SES-3 Order and grant preferential treatment to DIRECTV on the

basis that DIRECTV’s 17/24 GHz BSS payload is U.S.-licensed, whereas Ciel’s 17/24 BSS

payload is licensed by Canada.7 This is precisely the type of discriminatory regulatory treatment

that the Commission has long sought to eliminate with respect to its regulation of U.S.- and non-

U.S.-licensed satellite services.8 The Commission’s lack of jurisdiction over a Canadian-

licensed payload does not provide justification for the Commission to provide preferential

regulatory treatment to a U.S.-licensed payload.9

        Furthermore, the DISH Ciel-6i Application10 disproves DIRECTV’s claim that the Ciel-

6i payload is merely a “token” payload used to bolster Ciel’s international priority with respect




5
 See SES Americom, Application for Authority to Operate the SES-3 Replacement Satellite at 103º W.L.,
IBFS File No. SAT-RPL-20121228-00227, Narrative at 1 (Dec. 28, 2012) (“SES-3 Application”).
6
 See SES Americom, Inc. Application for Authority to Operate the SES-3 Satellite at 103º W.L., 29 FCC
Rcd 3678, ¶¶ 1, 8-9 (IB 2014) (“SES-3 Order”).
7
 See DIRECTV, Consolidated Opposition, IBFS File No. SAT-LOA-20140825-00094, at 2 (Nov. 17,
2014) (“DIRECTV Opposition”).
8
 See Foreign-Licensed Space Station Provision of Service in the United States, Report and Order, 12
FCC Rcd 24094, ¶ 185 n.359 (1997) (“We reiterate our intent to hold non-U.S. satellite operators to the
same rules as we do our U.S.-licensed space station operators.”).
9
 See id. ¶ 21 (“Under Article II of the [General Agreement on Trade in Services], all [World Trade
Organization] Members must provide [most-favored-nation] treatment to like services and service
suppliers of all other WTO Members.”).
10
  See DISH Operating L.L.C., Application for Blanket Earth Station License, IBFS File No. SES-LFS-
20140924-00752 (Sept. 24, 2014) (“DISH Ciel-6i Application”).


                                                  –2–


to use of the 17/24 GHz BSS spectrum at 103º W.L.11 The DISH Ciel-6i Application describes

in detail DISH’s plans to use the Ciel-6i payload to develop the provision of video and data

services for the planned deployment of terrestrial wireless broadband services in the United

States. Thus, contrary to DIRECTV’s assertions, the Ciel-6i payload is not merely a “token”

payload.

          Based upon the foregoing, the Commission should deny or defer action on the DIRECTV

15 Application until either: (i) the Commission promptly acts on the SES-3 Application and the

DISH Ciel-6i Application; or (ii) DIRECTV and Ciel have completed coordination of their

respective 17/24 GHz BSS payloads, including the Ciel-6i payload, at 103º W.L.



                                             Respectfully submitted,

                                             DISH OPERATING L.L.C.



                                             By:      /s/
                                                   Jeffrey H. Blum

November 28, 2014




11
     See DIRECTV Opposition at 3-4.


                                              –3–


                               CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

       I, Hadass Kogan, hereby certify under penalty of perjury that a copy of the foregoing
Reply to Opposition was served on November 28, 2014, by first-class mail upon the following:


William M. Wiltshire
Michael Nilsson
Counsel to DIRECTV
Harris, Wiltshire & Grannis LLP
1919 M Street NW
Eighth Floor
Washington, DC 20036

Stacy R. Fuller
Vice President, Regulatory Affairs
DIRECTV, LLC
901 F Street NW
Suite 600
Washington, DC 20004

Daniel C.H. Mah
Regulatory Counsel
SES Americom, Inc.
1129 20th Street, N.W.
Suite 1000
Washington, DC 20036

Karis A. Hastings
SatCom Law LLC
1317 F Street, N.W.
Suite 400
Washington, DC 20004

Scott Gibson
Vice President & General Counsel
Ciel Satellite Limited Partnership
116 Lisgar Street
Suite 401
Ottawa, Ontario K2P 0c2
CANADA
                                                 /s/
                                                 Hadass Kogan



Document Created: 2014-11-25 15:30:53
Document Modified: 2014-11-25 15:30:53

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC