Attachment Tech Appendix

This document pretains to SES-STA-20160620-00556 for Special Temporal Authority on a Satellite Earth Station filing.

IBFS_SESSTA2016062000556_1139679

United Teleports 7-meter Gateway STA Request Technical Appendix I. Supplemental Schedule S Technical Information II. Scientific-Atlanta 7 Meter Gateway Earth Station Radiation Hazard Study III. FCC Letter to ANATEL IV. Comsearch Frequency Coordination Analysis V. Engineer Certification 1

I. Supplemental Schedule S Technical Information 1. PURPOSE AND SCOPE The purpose of this Attachment is to provide the Commission with the technical characteristics of the EUTELSAT 65 WEST A (“E65WA”) satellite in support of the earth station application filed by United Teleports. This attachment, prepared with the cooperation of the satellite operator Eutelsat do Brasil LTDA (“Eutelsat”), contains information required by the Commission that cannot be entered online into the Schedule S submission. 2. GENERAL DESCRIPTION Eutelsat operates the E65WA satellite at the nominal 65° W.L. location. The satellite is capable of providing a wide range of FSS services using the C-, Ku- and Ka-bands. For purposes of the instant application, U.S. market access is being sought only for Ku-band uplink frequencies. Accordingly, only the characteristics of the Ku-band payload are described herein and in the Schedule S submission. The Ku-band frequencies used by the satellite are the International Telecommunications Union (“ITU”) Appendix 30B bands: 12.75-13.25 GHz uplink band and the 10.7-10.95 GHz and 11.2-11.45 GHz downlink bands. The satellite employs twenty-four 36 MHz Ku-band transponders. There are two Ku-band beams in both the uplink and downlink directions: the “South American” beam, which includes coverage of southern Florida, and the Brazil beam. Twelve transponders are switchable between the South American and Brazil beams. 3. FREQUENCY PLAN AND POLARIZATION The E65WA satellite’s Ku-band frequency and polarization plan, including beam connectivity options, are provided in the associated Schedule S submission. The satellite 2

provides full frequency reuse as required by Section 25.210(f) of the Commission’s rules, 47 C.F.R. § 25.210(f) 4. SPACE STATION TRANSMIT & RECEIVE CAPABILITIES The transmit and receive antenna gain contours of the satellite’s Ku-band beams are provided in GXT format and are embedded in the associated Schedule S submission. The maximum EIRP and EIRP densities for each of the downlink beams are listed in Table 1. Also listed are the maximum and minimum saturating flux-density (“SFD”) levels, referenced at the beam peak, for each of the uplink beams. Table 1. Maximum Downlink EIRP and EIRP Densities. Maximum and Minimum SFD’s. Maximum Maximum Downlink Downlink Maximum SFD Minimum SFD Beam EIRP EIRP Density (dBW/m2) (dBW/m2) (dBW) (dBW/Hz) Brazil 51.9 -23.0 -70 -92 South America 50.4 -23.0 -70 -92 In addition, authorized uplink transmissions towards the E65WA satellite will not exceed an input power density of -47 dBW/Hz. The E65WA satellite network will be operated in a manner consistent with ITU coordination agreements reached by Brazil. 5. ARRANGEMENT FOR TELEMETRY, TRACKING & COMMUNICATIONS Telemetry, tracking and communications (“TT&C”) will not be conducted from U.S. territory. The satellite control center and primary TT&C site is located in Brazil. The backup TT&C site is located in Portugal. Information for the satellite control center and TT&C stations is provided below: Satellite Control Center and Primary TT&C Station: Avenida Valville, 450 – Sítio Tanquinho – Santana do Parnaíba 3

SP CEP 06532-010, Brazil 24/7 contact phone numbers: +55 11 2110-3365 / +55 11 2110-3353 / +55 11 4196- 5594 Backup TT&C Station Location: Zona Franca Industrial da Madeira – Lote 27 B/C 9200-047 Caniçal, Madeira, Portugal Contact phone number: +351 291 969 905 6. POWER FLUX DENSITY ANALYSIS The Commission’s Part 25 rules do not contain power flex density (“PFD”) limits applicable to the ITU Appendix 30B downlink bands at 10.7-10.95 GHz and 11.2-11.45 GHz. However, it is noted that Article 21 of the ITU Radio Regulations includes PFD limits that are applicable to GSO satellites using these bands. The ITU limits are identical to those of Section 25.208(b) of the Commission’s rules, 47 C.F.R. § 25208(b). Tables 2 and 3 show the PFD levels that will occur at various angles of arrival for the two downlink beams when transmitting with a maximum downlink EIRP density of -23 dBW/Hz. These two tables demonstrate compliance with the ITU’s Article 21 PFD limits. 4

Table 2. Maximum PFD Levels of Beam SADH Applicable Worst Case PFD Limit for PFD Level at Angle Angle of Spreading Gain PFD Margin Angle of of Arrival Loss Contour Arrival Arrival (dBW/m2/4 (dBW/m2) (dB) (dB) (dBW/m2/4 kHz) kHz) 0° -150.0 -163.4 -20 -170.4 20.4 5° -150.0 -163.3 -19 -169.3 19.3 10° -147.5 -163.2 -17 -167.1 19.6 15° -145.0 -163.0 -14.8 -164.8 19.8 20° -142.5 -162.9 -14.6 -164.5 22.0 25° -140.0 -162.8 -14.2 -164.0 24.0 72.4° -140.0 -162.1 0.0 -149.1 9.1 (Peak) Table 3. Maximum PFD Levels of Beams BDH and BDV Applicable Worst Case PFD Limit for PFD Level at Angle Angle of Spreading Gain PFD Margin Angle of of Arrival Loss Contour Arrival Arrival (dBW/m2/4 (dBW/m2) (dB) (dB) (dBW/m2/4 kHz) kHz) 0° -150.0 -163.4 -20 -170.4 20.4 5° -150.0 -163.3 -19 -166.1 19.3 10° -147.5 -163.2 -19 -165.3 21.6 15° -145.0 -163.0 -18 -164.2 23.0 20° -142.5 -162.9 -17 -163.1 24.4 25° -140.0 -162.8 -16 -160.0 25.8 66.4° -140.0 -162.2 0.0 -149.2 9.2 (Peak) This information is provided for completeness; United Teleports does not seek to downlink from the E65WA satellite in the United States. 5

7. TWO-DEGREE COMPATIBILITY ANALYSIS This section demonstrates that the E65WA satellite network’s operations are two-degree compatible. Currently there are no operational Ku-band satellites two degrees away from the nominal 65° W.L. location using the Appendix 30B bands, nor are there any pending applications before the Commission requesting to use the Ku-band at a location two degrees or less from the nominal 65° W.L. location. In order to demonstrate two-degree compatibility, the transmission parameters of the E65WA satellite network have been used as both the wanted and interfering transmissions. Table 4 provides a summary of the typical transmission parameters used by the E65WA satellite network and which were used in the interference analysis. Table 5 shows the results of the interference calculations in terms of the overall C/I margins. The interference calculations assume a 1 dB advantage for topocentric-to- geocentric conversion, all wanted and interfering carriers are co-polarized and all earth station antennas conform to a sidelobe pattern of 29-25 log(θ). The C/I calculations were performed on a per Hz basis. These tables indicate that all the C/I margins are positive, thereby demonstrating the two- degree compatibility of the E65WA satellite network. Table 4. Typical Transmission Parameters Emission Bandwidt Tx E/S Uplink Rx E/S Carrier Downlink C/I Criterion Designato h Gain EIRP Gain ID EIRP (dBW) (dB) r (MHz) (dBi) (dBW) (dBi) 1 49K0G7W 0.0486 42.4 41.0 12.3 56.5 16.5 2 1M34G7W 1.34 53.9 59.7 30.8 47.2 16.5 3 6M33G7W 6.33 53.9 67.1 38.2 44.7 17.7 4 10M0G7W 10.0 57.3 70.1 40.9 44.7 16.5 5 36M0G7W 36.0 57.3 79.1 48.9 41.1 20.5 6

Table 5. Summary of the overall link C/I margins (dB). Interfering Carriers Carrier 1 2 3 4 5 ID 5. 1 10.9 10.2 11.3 8.3 4 Wanted Carriers 8. 2 9.4 8.8 8.4 5.9 5 7. 3 6.7 6.1 5.6 3.1 2 9. 4 8.8 8.1 7.5 5.1 3 6. 5 3.9 3.3 2.6 0.1 3 8. ORBITAL DEBRIS MITIGATION PLAN 8.1 Spacecraft Hardware Design Eutelsat confirms that the E65WA satellite, based on the Space Systems Loral 1300 series spacecraft, will not undergo any planned release of debris during its operation. Furthermore, all separation and deployment mechanisms, and any other potential source of debris, will be retained by the spacecraft. In conjunction with Space Systems Loral, Eutelsat has assessed and limited the probability of the satellite becoming a source of debris by collisions with small debris or meteoroids of less than one centimeter in diameter that could cause loss of control and prevent post-mission disposal. Eutelsat has taken steps to limit the effects of such collisions through shielding, the placement of components, and the use of redundant systems. The EW65A satellite includes separate TT&C and propulsion subsystems that are necessary for end-of-life disposal. The spacecraft TT&C system, vital for orbit raising, is extremely rugged with regard to meteoroids smaller than 1 cm, by virtue of its redundancy, shielding, separation of components and physical characteristics. Omni- directional antennas are mounted on opposite sides of the spacecraft. These antennas are 7

extremely rugged and capable of providing adequate coverage even if struck, bent or otherwise damaged by a small or medium sized particle. Either one of the two omni- directional antennas, for both command and telemetry, will be sufficient to enable orbit raising. The redundant command receivers and decoders and redundant telemetry encoders and transmitters are located within a shielded area. A single rugged thruster and shielded propellant tank provides the energy for orbit-raising. Otherwise, there are no single points of failure in the system. 8.2 Minimizing Accidental Explosions In conjunction with Space Systems/Loral, Eutelsat has assessed and limited the probability of accidental explosions during and after completion of mission operations. The satellite manufacturer has taken steps to ensure that debris generation will not result from the conversion of energy sources on board the satellite into energy that fragments the satellite. In particular, the satellite manufacturer advises that burst tests are performed on all pressure vessels during qualification testing to demonstrate a margin of safety against burst. Bipropellant mixing is prevented by the use of valves that prevent backwards flow in propellant lines and pressurization lines. All batteries and fuel tanks are monitored for pressure and temperature. Excessive battery charging or discharging is limited by a monitoring and control system which will automatically limit the possibility of fragmentation. Corrective action, if not automatically undertaken, will be immediately undertaken by the spacecraft operator to avoid destruction and fragmentation. Thruster temperatures, impulse and thrust duration are carefully monitored, and any thruster may be turned off via redundant valves. Consequently, there is no possibility of explosion during the 8

operating mission. Space Systems/Loral has also conducted a failure mode effects and criticality analysis as part of the design process. In order to ensure that the spacecraft has no explosive risk after it has been successfully de-orbited, all stored energy onboard the spacecraft will be removed. Upon successful de-orbit of the spacecraft, all propulsion lines and latch valves will be vented and left open. Battery chargers will be turned off and all batteries will be left in a permanent discharge state. 8.3 Safe Flight Profiles In considering current and planned satellites that may have a station-keeping volume that overlaps the E65WA satellite, Eutelsat has reviewed the lists of FCC licensed satellite networks, as well as those that are currently under consideration by the FCC. In addition, satellite networks for which a request for coordination has been published by the ITU within ±0.2 degrees of 65.2° W.L. have also been reviewed. The Brazilian satellite operator Star One operates the STAR ONE C1 satellite at the 65.0° W.L orbital location. The satellite operates with an east-west station-keeping tolerance of ±0.05°. The E65WA satellite operates at 65.2° W.L, and with an east-west station- keeping tolerance of ±0.05°, thereby eliminating the possibility of any station-keeping volume overlap with the STAR ONE C1 satellite. There are no pending applications before the Commission requesting authorization to use an orbital location within ±0.2° of 65.2° W.L. and Eutelsat is not aware of any satellite with an overlapping station-keeping volume with the E65WA satellite that is the subject of an ITU filing and that is either in orbit or progressing towards launch. Based on the preceding discussion, Eutelsat concludes that physical coordination of the E65WA satellite with another party is not required at the present time. 9

8.4 Post-Mission Disposal Plan At the end of the operational life of the E65WA satellite, it will be maneuvered to a disposal orbit with a minimum perigee of 300 km above the normal GSO operational orbit. This proposed disposal orbit altitude is based on the following calculation, as required by Section 25.283: Total Solar Pressure Area “A” = 97.5 m2 “M” = Dry Mass of Satellite = 2757.5 kg “CR” = Solar Pressure Radiation Coefficient = 1.24 Therefore, the Minimum Disposal Orbit Perigee Altitude is: = 36,021 km + 1000 x CR x A/M = 36,021 km + 1000 x 1.24 x 97.5/2757.5 = 36,035 km = 279 km above GSO (35,786 km) To provide margin, the nominal disposal orbit will be increased to 300 km. This will require 10.8 kg of propellant that will be reserved, taking account of all fuel measurement uncertainties, to perform the final orbit-raising maneuvers. 9. ITU Filings The E65WA satellite network operates under the following two ITU Appendix 30B filings: B-SAT-3R – AP30B/A6A/254 published in IFIC 2744. B-SAT-3R-1 – AP30B/A6A/333 published in IFIC 2774. __________________________ 10

II. Radiation Hazard Study Scientific-Atlanta 7 Meter Gateway Earth Station This study analyzes the non-ionizing radiation levels for a Scientific-Atlanta 7 meter gateway earth station antenna transmitting in the 12.75-13.25 GHz band. This report is developed in accordance with the prediction methods contained in OET Bulletin No. 65, Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, Edition 97-01. Bulletin No. 65 specifies that there are two separate tiers of exposure limits that are dependent on the area of exposure and/or the status of the individuals who are subject to the exposure -- the General Population/Uncontrolled Environment and the Controlled Environment, where the general population cannot access. The maximum level of non-ionizing radiation to which individuals may be exposed is limited to a power density level of 5 milliwatts per square centimeter (5 mW/cm2) averaged over any 6 minute period in a controlled environment, and the maximum level of non-ionizing radiation to which the general public is exposed is limited to a power density level of 1 milliwatt per square centimeter (1 mW/cm2) averaged over any 30 minute period in a uncontrolled environment. In the normal range of transmit powers for satellite antennas, the power densities at or around the antenna surface are expected to exceed safe levels. The purpose of this study is to determine the power flux density levels for the earth station under study as compared with the MPE limits. This comparison is done in each of the following regions: 1. Far-field region 2. Near-field region 3. Transition region 4. The region between the subreflector or feed and main reflector surface 5. The main reflector region 6. The region between the antenna edge and the ground Input Parameters The following input parameters were used in the calculations: Parameters: Value Unit Symbol Antenna Diameter 7 m D Antenna Transmit Gain 57.3 dBi G Transmit Frequency 13000 MHz f Subreflector Diameter 61 cm d Power Input to the Antenna 1000 W P 11

Calculated Parameters: The following values were calculated using the above input parameters and the corresponding formulas: Parameter Value Unit Symbol Formula Antenna Surface Area 38.48 m2 A πD2/4 Area of Subreflector 2922.5 cm2 a πd2/4 Antenna Efficiency 0.59 η Gλ2/(π2D2) Gain Factor 537232 g 10 G/10 Wavelength 0.02306 m λ 300/f Behavior of EM Fields as a Function of Distance The behavior of the characteristics of EM fields varies depending on the distance from the radiating antenna. These characteristics are analyzed in three primary regions: the near-field region, the far-field region and the transition region. Of interest also are the region between the antenna main reflector and the subreflector, the region of the main reflector area and the region between the main reflector and ground. Figure 1. EM Fields as a Function of Distance 12

For parabolic aperture antennas with circular cross sections, such as the antenna under study, the near-field, far-field and transition region distances are calculated as follows: Parameter Value Unit Formula Near-Field Distance 531.2 m Rnf = D2/(4λ) Distance to Far-Field 1275 m Rff = 0.60D2/(λ) Minimum Transition Region Distance 531.2 m Rt = Rnf The distance in the transition region is between the near and far fields. Thus, Rnf < Rt < Rff. However, the power density in the transition region will not exceed the power density in the near-field. Therefore, for purposes of the present analysis, the distance of the transition region can equate the distance to the near-field. Power Flux Density Calculations The power flux density is considered to be at a maximum through the entire length of the near-field. This region is contained within a cylindrical volume with a diameter, D, equal to the diameter of the antenna. In the transition region and the far-field, the power density decreases inversely with the square of the distance. The following equations are used to calculate power density in these regions. Parameter Value Unit Symbol Formula Power Density in the Near-Field 6.15 mW/cm2 Snf 16.0 η P/(πD2) Power Density in the Far-Field 2.63 mW/cm2 Sff GP/(4π Rff2) Power Density in the Transition Region 6.15 mW/cm2 St Snf Rnf /(Rt) Transmissions from the feed assembly are directed towards the subreflector surface and are reflected back towards the main reflector. The energy between the subreflector and main reflector can be determined by calculating the power density at the subreflector surface. Parameter Value Unit Symbol Formula Power Density at the Subreflector 1369 mW/cm2 Sfa 4P / a The power density in the main reflector is determined similarly to the power density calculation at the subreflector, except that the area of the reflector is used. Parameter Value Unit Symbol Formula Power Density at Main Reflector 10.4 mW/cm2 Ssurface 4P / A The power density between the reflector and ground, assuming uniform illumination of the reflector surface, is calculated as follows: Parameter Value Unit Symbol Formula Power Density b/w Reflector and Ground 2.60 mW/cm2 Sg P/A 13

The table below summarizes the calculated power density levels for each region and compares those levels to those allowed in an occupational/controlled environment. Radiation Occupational/Controlled Power Environment Region Density Level (5.0 mW/cm²) (mW/cm2) Near Field (Rnf = 531.2 m) 6.15 Exceeds Limits Far Field (Rff = 1275 m) 2.63 Satisfies FCC MPE Transition Region (Rnf < Rt < Rff) 6.15 Exceeds Limits Region between Subreflector and Main Exceeds Limits 1369 Reflector Main Reflector Surface 10.4 Exceeds Limits Region between Main Reflector and Ground 2.60 Satisfies FCC MPE The results show that a potential radiation hazard exists in the regions noted above. The applicant has taken proper measures to ensure that it meets the requirements specified in 47 C.F.R. § 1.1310. Specifically, the antenna is installed at the United Teleports facility in Port St. Lucie, Florida, and is an occupational/controlled environment. The facility is located within an enclosed walled courtyard, which restricts any public access. The earth station is marked with the standard radiation hazard warnings, as is the area in the vicinity of the antenna. The applicant will ensure that the main beam of the antenna will be pointed at least one diameter away from any building, or other obstacles in those areas that exceed the MPE limits. Since one diameter removed from the center of the main beam the levels are down at least 20 dB, or by a factor of 100, public safety will be ensured. Finally, the earth station’s operational personnel will not have access to the regions where the MPE levels are exceeded when the earth station is in operation. As a matter of procedure, the transmitter will be turned off during periods of antenna maintenance, thereby eliminating any potential radiation hazard. 14

III. FCC Letter to ANATEL FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION INTERNATIONAL BUREAU WASHINGTON, D.C. 20554 fax: +1 202 418 1208; TWX: 710 822 0160 In reply,refer to: 800C2/SEB16174 Telefax message: To: Agência Nacional de Telecomunicações - ANATEL Assessoria Internacional SAUS-Quadra 6 - Bloco H - 4th Floor 70070-940 BRASILIA, DF Brazil TELEFAX NO.: 011 + 55 61 23122244 C CC: ITU Radiocommunication Bureau Geneva, Switzerland Telefax no.: 41 22 730 5785 Date: 27 April 2016 Subject: Agreement under §6.6 of Article 6 of Appendix 30B References: 1) Special Section AP30B/A6A/333, BRIFIC 2744 dated 22.07.2014, concerning the B-SAT-3R-1 satellite network. 2) Our letter 800C2/SEB14393, dated 30.10.2014 3) Your letter CT. n°163/ORER-Anatel dated 25.09.2015 The US administration thanks the administration of Brazil for its request for agreement regarding the operation of the B-SAT-3R-1 satellite network in the 6725-7025 MHz (Earth to space) and 4500-4800 MHz (space to Earth), 10.70-10.95 GHz (space to Earth), 11.20-11.45 GHz (space to Earth) and 12.75-13.25 GHz (Earth to space) planned bands of APP30B. The US administration is pleased to provide its agreement under the provision §6.6 of Appendix 30B for inclusion of its territory in the service area of the B-SAT-3R-1 satellite network. However, this agreement does not guarantee market access to the US. Any earth station located within US territory seeking to communicate with the B-SAT-3R-1 satellite network must first be licensed in accordance with US laws and regulations. Any operation of the satellites would be in accordance with international Radio Regulations and relevant provisions. Any such license application may or may not be granted. REGARDS FEDCOMCOM SATELLITE DIVISION Direct Fax No.: +1 202 418 1208 (preferred) or +1 202 418 0398 (alternative) Email: IBmail@fcc.gov Authorized: J. Payton International Bureau/SD ****** 15

IV. Comsearch Frequency Coordination Analysis FREQUENCY COORDINATION AND INTERFERENCE ANALYSIS REPORT Prepared for United Teleports PORT ST LUCIE, FL Satellite Earth Station Prepared By: COMSEARCH 19700 Janelia Farm Boulevard Ashburn, VA 20147 May 19, 2016 16

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................................................................ 3 2. SUMMARY OF RESULTS ............................................................................................................................ 4 3. SUPPLEMENTAL SHOWING ....................................................................................................................... 5 4. EARTH STATION COORDINATION DATA .................................................................................................. 7 5. CERTIFICATION ......................................................................................................................................... 11 17 Frequency Coordination and Interference Analysis Report 05/19/2016 Page 2 of 11

1. CONCLUSIONS An interference study considering all existing, proposed and prior coordinated microwave facilities within the coordination contours of the proposed earth station demonstrates that this site will operate satisfactorily with the common carrier microwave environment. Further, there will be no restrictions of its operation due to interference considerations. 18 Frequency Coordination and Interference Analysis Report 05/19/2016 Page 3 of 11

2. SUMMARY OF RESULTS A number of great circle interference cases were identified during the interference study of the proposed earth station. Each of the cases, which exceeded the interference objective on a line-of-sight basis, was profiled and the propagation losses estimated using NBS TN101 (Revised) techniques. The losses were found to be sufficient to reduce the signal levels to acceptable magnitudes in every case. 19 Frequency Coordination and Interference Analysis Report 05/19/2016 Page 4 of 11

3. SUPPLEMENTAL SHOWING Pursuant to Part 25.203(c) of the FCC Rules and Regulations, the satellite earth station proposed in this application was coordinated by Comsearch using computer techniques and in accordance with Part 25 of the FCC Rules and Regulations. Coordination data for this earth station was sent to the below listed carriers with a letter dated 05/03/2016. Company 3G Wireless, LLC AERIAL VIDEO SYSTEMS Alascom Inc Ascent Media Network Services, LLC Bellsouth Telecommunications, Inc. Borgeson, Tom R. Broadcast Sports Inc. CBS OPERATIONS INC. Carolina Telephone and Telegraph Co Casper, John CenturyTel of the Southwest, Inc. Chicago Comnet Corp Cincinnati Bell Wireless LLC Citywide News Network, Inc. Cohen, Elena Comcast of CO/FL//MI/NMX/PA/WA, LLC Cowboys Stadium LP DCI II, INC. Direct Broadcast Services, Inc. GSN News, Inc Global Telecom & Technology Americas, In Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company HF Enterprises, Inc Hallco Unlimited, Inc. Hawaiian Telcom, Inc. Heiden, William Illinois Bell Telephone Company Indiana Bell Telephone Company Information & Display Systems, Inc. Information Super Station, LLC International Communications Group, Inc. Kentucky RSA #3 Cellular General Partner Kentucky RSA #4 Cellular General Partner MERCURY COMMUNICATIONS Metro Networks Communications, Inc. Michigan Bell Telephone Company Moreen, Steven K NEW ENGLAND DIGITAL DISTRIBUTION, INC. NEW ENGLAND SATELLITE SYSTEMS INC NSM Surveillance 20 Frequency Coordination and Interference Analysis Report 05/19/2016 Page 5 of 11

Navajo Communications Company NorthWest Suburbs Community Access Corp OHIO BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY Onboard Images Pacific Bell Tel Com dba AT&T California Penn Service Microwave Co., Inc. Plateau Telecommunications, Inc. Plum TV, LLC Production & Satellite Services, Inc. QUICK LINK CONNECTIONS INC Qwest Corporation RCC Minnesota Inc. - MN NE ND SD REMOTE FACILITIES CONSULTING SERVICES RF Central, LLC RF Film, Inc Radiofone, Inc. Randy Hermes Production Remote Broadcasts, Inc. SBE Coordinator – Florida Region Scripps Media, Inc. - WPTV Southwestern Bell Telephone L.P. Speedshotz, Inc Total RF Marketing Inc Unisat, Inc. United Telephone - Southeast VERIZON SOUTH INC. Verizon California Inc. Verizon Maryland, Inc. Verizon New England Inc. Verizon New Jersey, Inc. Verizon New York, Inc. Verizon North Inc. Verizon Northwest Inc. Verizon Pennsylvania, Inc. Verizon Virginia, Inc. Verizon Washington DC, Inc. Village Video Productions Inc Vyvx, LLC WFLX License Subsidiary, LLC WPEC Licensee, LLC WTVX Licensee, LLC Westar Satellite Services LP Western Technical Services Wexler Video, Inc. Winged Vision Inc Wisconsin Bell Telephone Company Wolfe Air Aviation 21 Frequency Coordination and Interference Analysis Report 05/19/2016 Page 6 of 11

4. EARTH STATION COORDINATION DATA This section presents the data pertinent to frequency coordination of the proposed earth station that was circulated to all carriers within its coordination contours. 22 Frequency Coordination and Interference Analysis Report 05/19/2016 Page 7 of 11

COMSEARCH Earth Station Data Sheet 19700 Janelia Farm Boulevard, Ashburn, VA 20147 (703)726-5500 http://www.comsearch.com Date: 05/19/2016 Job Number: 160503COMSGE06 Administrative Information Status ENGINEER PROPOSAL Call Sign Licensee Code UNTELE Licensee Name United Teleports Site Information PORT ST LUCIE, FL Venue Name Latitude (NAD 83) 27° 16' 56.5" N Longitude (NAD 83) 80° 28' 58.6" W Climate Zone B Rain Zone 1 Ground Elevation (AMSL) 7.46 m / 24.5 ft Link Information Satellite Type Geostationary Mode TO - Transmit-Only Modulation Digital Satellite Arc 64° W to 66° West Longitude Azimuth Range 147.2° to 150.6° Corresponding Elevation Angles 53.3° / 54.3° Antenna Centerline (AGL) 3.66 m / 12.0 ft Antenna Information Transmit - FCC32 Manufacturer Scientific-Atlanta Model 7 Meter Gain / Diameter 57.3 dBi / 7.0 m 3-dB / 15-dB Beamwidth 0.22° / 0.38° Max Available RF Power (dBW/4 kHz) -17.7 (dBW/MHz) 6.3 Maximum EIRP (dBW/4 kHz) 39.6 (dBW/MHz) 63.6 Interference Objectives: Long Term -151.0 dBW/4 kHz 20% Short Term -128.0 dBW/4 kHz 0.0025% Frequency Information Transmit 13.0 GHz Emission / Frequency Range (MHz) 10M0G7W - 36M0G7W / 12750.0 - 13250.0 Max Great Circle Coordination Distance 117.2 km / 72.8 mi Precipitation Scatter Contour Radius 100.0 km / 62.1 mi 23 Frequency Coordination and Interference Analysis Report 05/19/2016 Page 8 of 11

COMSEARCH Earth Station Data Sheet 19700 Janelia Farm Boulevard, Ashburn, VA 20147 (703)726-5500 http://www.comsearch.com Coordination Values PORT ST LUCIE, FL Licensee Name United Teleports Latitude (NAD 83) 27° 16' 56.5" N Longitude (NAD 83) 80° 28' 58.6" W Ground Elevation (AMSL) 7.46 m / 24.5 ft Antenna Centerline (AGL) 3.66 m / 12.0 ft Antenna Model Scientific-Atlanta 7 meter Antenna Mode Transmit 13.0 GHz Interference Objectives: Long Term -151.0 dBW/4 kHz 20% Short Term -128.0 dBW/4 kHz 0.0025% Max Available RF Power -17.7 (dBW/4 kHz) Transmit 13.0 GHz Horizon Antenna Horizon Coordination Azimuth (°) Elevation (°) Discrimination (°) Gain (dBi) Distance (km) 0 0.00 120.17 -10.00 117.17 5 0.00 118.19 -10.00 117.17 10 0.00 116.01 -10.00 117.17 15 0.00 113.67 -10.00 117.17 20 0.00 111.18 -10.00 117.17 25 0.00 108.56 -10.00 117.17 30 0.00 105.84 -10.00 117.17 35 0.00 103.04 -10.00 117.17 40 0.00 100.16 -10.00 117.17 45 0.00 97.24 -10.00 117.17 50 0.00 94.27 -10.00 117.17 55 0.00 91.29 -10.00 117.17 60 0.00 88.30 -10.00 117.17 65 0.00 85.32 -10.00 117.17 70 0.00 82.36 -10.00 117.17 75 0.00 79.44 -10.00 117.17 80 0.00 76.58 -10.00 117.17 85 0.00 73.78 -10.00 117.17 90 0.00 71.07 -10.00 117.17 95 0.00 68.48 -10.00 117.17 100 0.00 66.00 -10.00 117.17 105 0.00 63.68 -10.00 117.17 110 0.00 61.53 -10.00 117.17 115 0.00 59.58 -10.00 117.17 120 0.00 57.85 -10.00 117.17 125 0.00 56.36 -10.00 117.17 130 0.00 55.15 -10.00 117.17 135 0.00 54.22 -10.00 117.17 140 0.00 53.60 -10.00 117.17 145 0.00 53.30 -10.00 117.17 150 0.00 53.32 -10.00 117.17 155 0.00 53.67 -10.00 117.17 160 0.00 54.33 -10.00 117.17 165 0.00 55.30 -10.00 117.17 170 0.00 56.55 -10.00 117.17 175 0.00 57.91 -10.00 117.17 180 0.00 59.46 -10.00 117.17 185 0.00 61.23 -10.00 117.17 24 Frequency Coordination and Interference Analysis Report 05/19/2016 Page 9 of 11

COMSEARCH Earth Station Data Sheet 19700 Janelia Farm Boulevard, Ashburn, VA 20147 (703)726-5500 http://www.comsearch.com Coordination Values PORT ST LUCIE, FL Licensee Name United Teleports Latitude (NAD 83) 27° 16' 56.5" N Longitude (NAD 83) 80° 28' 58.6" W Ground Elevation (AMSL) 7.46 m / 24.5 ft Antenna Centerline (AGL) 3.66 m / 12.0 ft Antenna Model Scientific-Atlanta 7 meter Antenna Mode Transmit 13.0 GHz Interference Objectives: Long Term -151.0 dBW/4 kHz 20% Short Term -128.0 dBW/4 kHz 0.0025% Max Available RF Power -17.7 (dBW/4 kHz) Transmit 13.0 GHz Horizon Antenna Horizon Coordination Azimuth (°) Elevation (°) Discrimination (°) Gain (dBi) Distance (km) 190 0.00 63.21 -10.00 117.17 195 0.00 65.37 -10.00 117.17 200 0.00 67.69 -10.00 117.17 205 0.00 70.15 -10.00 117.17 210 0.00 72.73 -10.00 117.17 215 0.00 75.40 -10.00 117.17 220 0.00 78.16 -10.00 117.17 225 0.00 80.97 -10.00 117.17 230 0.00 83.84 -10.00 117.17 235 0.00 86.74 -10.00 117.17 240 0.00 89.65 -10.00 117.17 245 0.00 92.56 -10.00 117.17 250 0.00 95.47 -10.00 117.17 255 0.00 98.34 -10.00 117.17 260 0.00 101.17 -10.00 117.17 265 0.00 103.94 -10.00 117.17 270 0.00 106.64 -10.00 117.17 275 0.00 109.24 -10.00 117.17 280 0.00 111.73 -10.00 117.17 285 0.00 114.09 -10.00 117.17 290 0.00 116.29 -10.00 117.17 295 0.00 118.31 -10.00 117.17 300 0.00 120.14 -10.00 117.17 305 0.00 121.74 -10.00 117.17 310 0.00 123.10 -10.00 117.17 315 0.00 124.18 -10.00 117.17 320 0.00 124.99 -10.00 117.17 325 0.00 125.49 -10.00 117.17 330 0.00 125.68 -10.00 117.17 335 0.00 125.56 -10.00 117.17 340 0.00 125.13 -10.00 117.17 345 0.00 124.40 -10.00 117.17 350 0.00 123.38 -10.00 117.17 355 0.00 121.93 -10.00 117.17 25 Frequency Coordination and Interference Analysis Report 05/19/2016 Page 10 of 11

5. CERTIFICATION I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM THE TECHNICALLY QUALIFIED PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PREPARATION OF THE FREQUENCY COORDINATION DATA CONTAINED IN THIS APPLICATION, THAT I AM FAMILIAR WITH PARTS 101 AND 25 OF THE FCC RULES AND REGULATIONS, THAT I HAVE EITHER PREPARED OR REVIEWED THE FREQUENCY COORDINATION DATA SUBMITTED WITH THIS APPLICATION, AND THAT IT IS COMPLETE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. BY: _ Gary K. Edwards Senior Manager COMSEARCH 19700 Janelia Farm Boulevard Ashburn, VA 20147 DATED: May 19, 2016 26 Frequency Coordination and Interference Analysis Report 05/19/2016 Page 11 of 11

V. CERTIFICATION OF PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR PREPARING ENGINEERING INFORMATION I hereby certify that I am the technically qualified person responsible for preparation of the engineering information contained in this STA request, that I am familiar with Part 25 of the Commission’s rules that I have either prepared or reviewed the engineering information submitted in this application, and that it is complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge and belief. /s/ ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ Stephen D. McNeil Telecomm Strategies Canada, Inc. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (613) 270-1177 June 15, 2016 27


Document Created: 3420-04-09 00:00:00
Document Modified: 3420-04-09 00:00:00
© 2025 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC