Attachment Exhibits A-E

This document pretains to SES-STA-20100115-00071 for Special Temporal Authority on a Satellite Earth Station filing.

IBFS_SESSTA2010011500071_794691

EXHIBIT A PANAMSAT LICENSEE CORP. SPECIAL TEMPORARY AUTHORITY REQUEST EARTH STATION KL—92 _ IOT SERVICES FOR INTELSAT 16 SATELLITE JANUARY 15, 2010

Exhibit A Compliance with FCC Report & Order (96—377) in respect to the 13.75 — 14.0 GHz Band 1. Background This exhibit is presented to demonstrate the extent to which the PanAmSat Licensee Corp. satellite earth station in Castle Rock, CO is in compliance with FCC Report & Order 96—377. The potential interference from the earth station to U.S. Navy shipboard radiolocation operations (RADAR) and the NASA space research activities in the 13.75 — 14.0 GHz band is addressed in this exhibit. The parameters for the earth station are provided in Table 1 below. Table 1. Earth Station Characteristics _ e Coordinates (NAD83): 39° 16‘ 38.0" N, 104° 48 26.9" W e Satellite Location for Earth Station: Intelsat IS—16 at 48.0° W e Frequency Band: 13.75—14.5 GHz for uplink e Polarizations: Linear e Emissions: 850KNON o Modulafgion: No Modulation e Maximum Aggregate Uplink EIRP: 85.0 dBW for all Carriers e Transmit Antenna Characteristics Antenna Size: 12.5 meterin Diameter Antenna Type/Model: NEC Gain: 64.0 dBi e RF power into Antenna Flange: 21.0 dBW or or —2.3 dBW/4 kHz (Maximum) e Minimum Elevation Angle: Castle Rock, Co. 16.7° @ 112.5° Az (Intelsat IS—16) e Side Lobe Antenna Gain: 32 — 25*log(0) _ Because the above uplink spectrum is shared with the Federal Government, coordination in this band requires resolution data pertaining to potential interference between the earth stations and both Navy Department and NASA systems. Potential interference from the earth station could impact the Navy and/or NASA systems in two areas. These areas are noted in FCC Order 96— 377 and consist of (1) Radiolocation and radionavigation, (2) Data Relay Satellites.

Summary of Coordination Issues: 1) Potential Impact to Government Radiolocation (Shipboard Radar) 2) Potential Impact to NASA Data RelaySatellite Systems (TDRSS) 2. Potential Impact to Government Radiolocation (Shipboard Radar) Radiolocation operations (RADAR) may occur anywhere in the 13.4 — 14 GHz frequency band aboard ocean going United States Navy ships. The FCC‘s Order 96—377 allocates the top 250 MHz of this 600 MHz band to the Fixed Satellite Service (FSS) on a co—primary basis with the radiolocation operations and provides for an interference protection level of —167 dBW/m*/4 kHz. The closest distance to the shoreline from the Castle Rock, CO earth station is approximately 1350 km Southwest towards the Pacific Ocean. Therefore, there should be no interference to the U.S. Navy RADAR from the Castle Rock, CO earth station due to distance and terrain blocking between the site and the shore. 3. Potential Impact to NASA‘s Data Relay Satellite System (TDRSS) The geographic location of the PanAmSat Licensee Corp. earth station in Castle Rock, CO is outside the 390 km radius coordination contour surrounding NASA‘s White Sands, NM ground station complex. Therefore, the TDRSS space—to—earth link will not be impacted by the PanAmSat earth station in Castle Rock, CO. The TDRSS space—to—space link in the 13.772 to 13.778 GHz band is assumed to be protected if an earth station produces an EIRP less than 71 dBW/6 MHz in this band. The 12.5 meterearth station dish will have an EIRP greater than 71 dBW/6 MHz in this band. The total EIRP for all carriers is 85.00 dBW, and the equivalent EIRP per 6 MHz segment remains at 85.0 dBW/6 MHz. Therefore, there will be interference to the TDRSS space—to—space link. In order to meet the 71 dBW/6 MHz interference criteria, the earth station would have to be limited to an RF power density 14.0 dB lower than the maximum of —2.3 dBW/4kHz or —16.3 dBW/4kHz or and EIRP of 71.0 dBW. 4. Coordination Issue Result Summary and Conclusions The results of the analysis and calculations performed in this exhibit indicate that compatible operation between the Castle Rock, CO earth station and the U.S. Navy and NASA systems . space—to—earth link are possible. These analyses have been based on the assumption of 850 kHz bandwidth carriers. Operations in NASA systems space—to—space link (13772.0 to 13778.0 MHz) —will occur at a lower EIRP value of 71 dBW. In order to meet the 71 dBW/6 MHz interference

criteria, the earth station will be limited to a maximum total EIRP of 71.0 dBW for this band. Hence, there will be no interference into TDRSS space—to—space links. No interference to U.S. Navy RADAR operations from the Castle Rock, CO site earth station _ will occur.

EXHIBIT B PANAMSAT LICENSEE CORP. SPECIAL TEMPORARY AUTHORITY REQUEST . EARTH STATION KL—92 IOT SERVICES FOR INTELSAT 16 SATELLITE JANUARY 15, 2010

' Exhibit B Radiation Hazard Report \_ Page 1 of 4 Analysis of Non-lohizing Radiation for a 12.5—Meter Earth Station System This report analyzes the non—ionizing radiation levels for a 12.5—meter earth station system. The analysis and calculations performed in this report comply with the methods described in the FCC Office of Engineering and Technology Bulletin, No. 65 first published in 1985 and revised in 1997 in Edition 97—01. The radiation safety limits used in the analysis are in conformance with the FCC R&O 96—326. Bulletin No. 65 and the FCC R&O specifies that there are two separate tiers of exposure limits that are dependant on the situation in which the exposure takes place and/or the status of the individuals who are subject to the exposure. The Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limits for persons in a General Population/Uncontrolled environment are shown in Table 1. The General Population/Uncontrolled MPE is a function of transmit frequency and is for an exposure period of thirty minutes or less. The MPE limits for persons in an Occupational/Controlled environment are shown in Table 2. The Occupational MPE is a function of transmit frequency and is for an exposure period of six minutes or less. The purpose—of the analysis described in this report is to determine the power flux density levels of the earth station in the far— field, near—field, transition region, between the subreflector or feed and main reflector surface, at the main reflector surface, and between the antenna edge and the ground and to compare these levels to the specified MPEs. s Table 1. Limits for General Population/Uncontrolled Exposure (MPE) Frequency Range (MHz) __Power Density ({mWicm*) 30—300 0.2 300—1500 Frequency (MHz)*(0.8/1200) 1500—100,000 1.0 Table 2. Limits for Occupational/Controlled Exposure (MPE) > Frequency Range (MHz) Power Density (mWicm*) 30—300 1.0 300—1500 Frequency (MHz)*(4.0/1200) 1500—100,000 5.0 Table 3. Formulas and Parameters Used for Determining Power Flux Densities Parameter | Symbol Formula Value _Units Antenna Diameter ' D Input 12.5 m Antenna Surface Area Asurtace x D/ 4 122.72 m* Subreflector Diameter Dsr Input 155.0 cm Areaof Subreflector Asr 1 Ds, "/4 . 18869.19 cm* Frequency F Input 14000 MHz Wavelength ' A 300 / F —_0.021429 m Transmit Power P Input 125.90 W Antenna Gain (dBi) Ges . Input 64.0 dBi Antenna Gain (factor) G 1 pces?? 2511886.4 n/a Pi T Constant 3.1415927 n/a Antenna Efficiency m G!(r°D") 0.75 n/a

. Exhibit B Radiation Hazard Report . Page 2 of 4 1. Far Field Distance Calculatioh The distance to the beginning of the far field can be determined from the following equation: Distance to the Far Field Region .__Ry =0.60 D/A . (1) = 4375.0 m The maximum main beam power density in the far field can be determined from the following equation: On—Axis Power Density in the Far Field S; =GP/(4 t Ry") . (2) 1.315 W/im* 0.131 mW/cm* 2. Near Field Calculation Power flux density is considered to be at a maximum value throughout the entire length of the defined Near Field region. The region is contained within a cylindrical volume having the same diameter as the antenna. Past the boundary of the Near Field region, the power density from the antenna decreases linearly with respect to increasing distance. ' The distance to the end of the Near Field can be determined from the following equation: Extent of the Near Field — Rf=D/(4A) . (3) . = 1822.9 m The maximum power density in the Near Field can be determined from the following equation: Near Field Power Density ' | Sn = 16.0 1 P / (r D) (4) ‘ . = 3.069 W/im* = 0.307 mW/icm* 3. Transition Region Calculation The Transition region is located between the Near and Far Field regions. The power density begins to decrease finearly. with increasing distance in the Transition region. While the power density decreases inversely with distance in the Transition region, the power density decreases inversely with the square of the distance in the Far Field region. The maximum power density in the Transition region will not exceed that calculated for the Near Field region. The power density calculated in Section 1 is the highest power density the antenna can produce in any of the regions away from the antenna. The power density at a distance R, can be determined from the following equation: Transition Region Power Density _ S =SirRyu/R (5) = 0.307 mWi/cm*

. . Exhibit B Radiation Hazard Report _ Page 3 of 4 4. Region between the Main Reflector and the Subreflector Transmissions from the feed assembly are directed toward the subreflector surface, and are reflected back toward the main reflector. The most common feed assemblies are waveguide flanges, horns or subreflectors. The energy between the subreflector and the reflector surfaces can be calculated by determining the power density at the subreflector surface This can be determined from the following equation: Power Density at the Subreflector Ser = 4000 P / Agr - (6) — = 26.689 mW/cm* 5. Main Reflector Regidn The power density in the main reflector is determined in the same manner as the power density at the subreflector. The area is now the area of the main reflector aperture and can be determined from the following equation: \ Power Density at the Main Reflector Surface Ssurtace * 4 P / Asurtace (7) = 4.104 W/im* = 0.410 mW/icm* 6. Region between the Main Reflector and the Ground Assuming uniform illumination of the reflector surface, the power density between the antenna and the ground can be determined from the following equation: Power Density between Reflector and Ground Sg =P / Asurtace (8) ‘ = 1.026 W/im* = 0.103 mW/cm*

Exhibit B Radiation Hazard Report . . Page 4 of 4 7. Summary of Calculations Table 4. Summary of Expected Radiation levels for Uncontrolled Environment Calculated Maximum > Radiation Power Density Level Region (mW/cm*) Hazard Assessment 1. Far Field (R;= 4375.0 m) S¢ 0.131 Satisfies FCC MPE 2. Near Field (R,,; = 1822.9 m) Sat 0.307 Satisfies FCC MPE 3. Transition Region (Ry <R, < Rg) S; 0.307 Satisfies FCC MPE 4. ~Between Main Reflector and Ser 26.689 . > Potential Hazard Subreflector O 5. Main Reflector Ssurface 0.410 Satisfies FCC MPE 6. Between Main Reflector and Ground Sg 0.103 Satisfies FCC MPE Table 5. Summary of Expected Radiation levels for Controlled Environment Calculated Maximum Radiation Power Density Region Level (mW/icm*) Hazard Assessment 1. Far Field (Rg= 4375.0 m) S¢ 0.131 Satisfies FCC MPE 2. Near Field (R,; = 1822.9 m) | Sat 0.307 Satisfies FCC MPE 3. Transition Region (R,; <R, < Ry) S; 0.307 Satisfies FCC MPE 4. Between Main Reflector and Ser 26.689 . Potential Hazard Subreflector | 5. Main Reflector Ssurface 0.410 Satisfies FCC MPE 6. Between Main Reflector and Ground _ Sq 0.103 Satisfies FCC MPE It is the applicant‘s responsibility to ensure that the public and operational personnel are not exposed to harmful levels of radiation. 8. Conclusions Based on the above analysis it is concluded that harmful levels of radiation will not exist in regions normally occupied by the public or the earth station‘s operating personnel. The transmitter will be turned off during antenna maintenance so that the FCC MPE of 5.0 mW/cm2 will be complied with for those regions with close proximity to the reflector that exceed acceptable levels.

. EXHIBIT C PANAMSAT LICENSEE CORP. SPECIAL TEMPORARY AUTHORITY REQUEST EARTH STATION KL—92 IOT SERVICES FOR INTELSAT 16 SATELLITE JANUARY 15, 2010

EXHIBIT C f . Page 1: Location E.S,Se 312 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION | APPLICATION FOR SATELLITE SPACE AND EARTH STATION AUTHORIZATIONS Technical and Operational Description) (Place an "X" in one of the blocks below) D License of New Station DRegistration of new Domestic D Amendment to a Pending Application D Modification of License/Registration D Notification of Minor Modification Receive—Only Station B1. Location of Earth Station Site. If temporary—fixed, mobile, or VSAT remote facility, specify area of operation and point of contact. If VSAT hub station, give its location For VSAT networks attach individual Schedule B, Page 1 sheets for each hub station and each remote station. Individually provide the Location, Points of Communications, and Destination Points for each hub and remote station. Bla. Station Call Sign B1b. Site identifier (HUB, REMOTE1, etc.) B1c. Telephone Number B1j. Geographic Coordinates N/S, Blk. Lat./Lon. KL92 . . (303) 660 — 3004 Deg. — Min. — Sec. — E/W Coordinates are: B1id. Mailing Street Address of Station or Area of Operation Ble. Name of Contact Person — | . lart 39° 16 38.0" N ] navbar 5281 East Garton Road Gary Phillips ' Lon 104° 48 26.9" W > . ho t en . NAD—83 BIf. City Big. County Blh. State Bli. Zip Code B1l. Site Elevation (AMSL) Castle Rock Douglas CO 80104 > 2087.9 meters B2. Points of Communications: List the names and orbit locations of all satellites with which this earth station will communicate. The entry "ALSAT"is sufficient to identify the names and locations of all satellite facilities licensed by the U.S. All non—U.S. licensed satellites must be listed individually. Satellite Name and Orbit Location Satellite Name and Orbit Location Satellite Name and Orbit Location Intelsat—16 (48° West Longitude) B3. Destination points for communications using non—U.S. licensed satellites. For each non—U.S. licensed satellite facility identified in section B2 above, spemfy the destination s) (countries) where the services will be 1 this earth station via each non—U.S. license satellite Use additional sheets as needed. Satellite Name List of Destination Points FCC 312, Schedule B — Page 1 February, 1998

EXHIBIT C — Page 2: Antennas FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION . APPLICATION FOR SATELLITE SPACE AND EARTH STATION AUTHORIZATIONS © FCC Form 312 — Schedule B: (Technical and Operational Description) B4. Earth Station Antenna Facilities: Use additional as needed. (a) Site ID* (b) (c) (d) Manufacturer (e) Model 8 (g) Antenna Gain Antenna ID** Quantity Antenna Size Transmit and/or Receive f (meters) ( dBi at GHz) Castle Rock CRK—KO1 1 NEC 12.5M 12.5 62.0 dBi at 12.00 GHz ' — 64.0 dBi at 14.00 GHz B5. Antenna Heights and Maximum Power Limits: (The corresponding Antenna ID in tables B4 and B5 applies to the same antenna) . Maximum Antenna Height (€) Building (£) Maximum (g) Total Input (a) (b) Antenna Structure (c) Above (d) Above Height Above Antenna Height Power at. (h) Total EIRP Antenna Registration No. Ground Level Mean Sea Level Ground Level Above Rooftop antenna flange for all carriers ID** (meters) (meters) (meters)*** {meters)*** (Watts) > (dBWw) CRK—KO1 2101.9 2087.9 125.9 85.0 Notes: * If this is an application for a VSAT network, identify the site (Item B1b, Schedule B, Page 1) where each antenna is located. Also include this Site—ID on Schedule B, Page 5. ** Identify each antenna in VSAT network or multi—antenna station with a unique identifier, such as HUB, REMOTE1, A1, A2, 10M, 12M, 7M, etc. Use this same antenna ID throughout tables B4, B5, B6, and B7 when referring to the same antenna. *** Attach sketch of site or exemption, See 47 CFR Part 17. ECC 312, Schedule B — Page 2 February, 1998

EXHIBIT C Page 3: Coordination | FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR SATELLITE SPACE AND EARTH STATION AUTHORIZATIONS FCC Form 312 — Schedule B: (Technical and Operational Description) B6. Frequency Coordination Limits: Use additional pages as needed. (a) (b) (c) Range of (d) Range of (e) Antenna (£) Antenna (g) Earth Station (h) Earth Station (i) Maximum ERP Antenna ID* Frequency Limits Satellite Arc Satellite Arc Elevation Angle Elevation Angle Azimuth Angle Azimuth Angle Density toward the (MHz) Eastern Limit** Western Limit** Eastern Limit Western Limit Eastern Limit Western Limit Horizon (dBW/MAkHz) CRK—KO1 10700.0 — 11450.0 48.0° W.L. 48.0° W.L. 16.7° 16.7° 112.5° 112.5° 11700.0 — 12200.0 48.0° W.L. 48.0° W.L. 16.7° 16.7° 112.5° 112.5° CRK—KO1 12750.0 —12762.0 48.0° W.L. 48.0° W.L. 16.7° 16.7° 112.5° 112.5° —0.9 CRK—KO1 12788.0 — 13250.0 48.0° W.L. 48.0° W.L. 16.7° 16.7° 112.5° 112.5° —0.9 CRK—KO1 13750.0 —13772.0 48.0° W.L. 48.0° W.L. 16.7° 16.7° 112.5° 112.5° —0.9 CRK—KO1 13778.0 —14000.0 48.0° W.L. 48.0° W.L. 16.7° 16.7° 112.5° 112.5° —0.9 CRK—KO1 14000.0 — 14500.0 48.0° W.L. 48.0° W.L. _ . 16.7° 16.7° 112.5° 112.5° | —0.9 CRK—KO1 13772.0 —13778.0 48.0° W.L. 48.0° W.L. 16.7° 16.7° 112.5° 112.5° —14.9 Notes: * Provide the ANTENNA—ID from table B4 to identify the antenna to which each frequency band and orbital are range is associated. ** If operating with geostationary satellites, give the orbital arc limits and the associated elevation and azimuth angles. Ifoperating with non—geostationary satellites, give the notation "NON—GEO" for the satellite arc and give the minimum operational elevation angle and the maximum azimuth angle range. ECC 312, Schedule B — Page 3 February, 1998

‘EXHIBIT C | — Page 4: Particulars FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR SATELLITE SPACE ANDEARTH STATION AUTHORIZATION®S FCC Form 312 — Schedule B; (Technical and Operational Description) B7. Particulars of OperationQu&articulars are required for each r.f. carrier): Use additional pages as needed. (a) (b) (c) (d) Antenna (e) (£) Maximum (g) Maximum (h) Description of Modulation and Services Antenna ID* Frequency Limits TR Polarization Emission EIRP per EIRP Density (MHz) Mode (HV,L.R) Designator > Carrier (dBW) per Carrier ** (dBW/4kHz) CRK—KO1 10700.0 — 11450.0 R H, V 150KNON TT&C and Command Carrier 11700.0 — 12200.0 R H, V 150KNON TT&C and Command Carrier CRK—KO1 12750.0—12762.0 T H, V 850KNON 85.0 61.7 TT&C and Command Carrier 12788.0 — 13250.0 T H, V 85OKNON 85.0 61.7 TT&C and Command Carrier 13750.0 — 13772.0 T H, V 850O0KNON 85.0 61.7 TT&C and Command Carrier 13778.0 — 14000.0 T H, V 850KNON 85.0 61.7 TT&C and Command Carrier 14000.0 — 14500.0 T H, V 850KNON 85.0 61.7 TT&C and Command Carrier 13772.0 — 13778.0 T H, V 850KNON 71.0 47.7 TT&C and Command Carrier Notes: * Provide the ANTENNA—ID from table B4 to identify the antenna to which each frequency band and emission is associated. For VSAT networks, include frequencies and emissions for all HUB and REMOTE units. ' ** Indicate whether the earth station transmits or receives in each frequency band. FCC 312, Schedule B — Page 4 February, 1998

EXHIBIT C Page 5: Questions FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR SATELLITE SPACE AND EARTH STATION AUTHORIZATIONS FCC Form 312 — Schedule_ B: (Technical and Operational Description) If VSAT Network, provide the SITE—ID (Item B1b) of the station that B8—B13 are in response to (HUB, REMOTE1, etc.): B8. If the proposed antenna(s) operate in the Fixed Satellite Service (FSS) with geostationary satellites, do(es) the proposed antenna(s) comply with the antenna gain patterns specified in Section 25.209(a) and (b) as demonstrated by the manufacturer‘s qualification X] YES |:| NO measurements? _If NO, provide as an exhibit, a technical analysis showing compliance with two—degree spacing policy. B9. If the proposed antenna(s) do not operate in the Fixed Satellite Service (FSS), or if they operate in the Fixed Satellite Service (FSS) with non—geostationary satellites, do(es) the proposed antenna(s) comply with the antenna gain patterns specified in D YES D NO N/A Section 25.209(a2) and (b) as demonstrated by the manufacturer‘s qualification measurement? B1Q. Is the facility operated by remote control? If YES, provide the location and telephone number of the control point. [] YES [ no Remote Control Point Location: B1Qa. Street Address BiOb. City B1Q0c. County B10.d. State/Country B1Qe. Zip Code B1Of. Telephone Number B10g. Call Sign of Control Station (if appropriate) B11. Is frequency coordination required? If YES, attach a frequency coordination report as an exhibit. YES [] No B12. Is coordination with another country required? If YES, attach the name of the country(ies) and plot of coordination contours as an exhibit. _ _| YES NO B13. FAA Notification — (See 47 CFT Part 17and 47 CFT Part 25.113(c)) Where FAA notification is required, have you attached a copy of a completed FCC Form 854 [_] YES NO and/or the FAA‘s study regarding the potential hazard of the structure to aviation? FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH 47 CFT PARTS 17 AND 25 WILL RESULT IN THE RETURN OF THIS APPLICATION FCC 312, Schedule B — Page 5 February, 1998

EXHIBIT D PANAMSAT LICENSEE CORP. SPECIAL TEMPORARY AUTHORITY REQUEST _ EARTH STATION KL—92 IOT SERVICES FOR INTELSAT 16 SATELLITE JANUARY 15, 2010

Exhibit D Prepared By COMSEARCH 19700 Janelia Farm Boulevard, Ashburn, VA 20147 (703)726—5500 http://www.comsearch.com Prepared For PanAmSat Licensee Corp. CASTLE ROCK, COLORADO Temporary Transmit/Receive Earth Station Operation Dates: O2/02/2010 — O8/02/2010 Pursuant to Part 25.203(c) of the FCC Rules and Regulations, the satellite earth station proposed in this application was coordinated by Comsearch using computer techniques and in accordance with Part 25 of the FCC Rules and Regulations. Verbal and written coordination was ‘conducted with the below listed carriers on December 29, 2009. Company AIRCELL, LLC t Abraham Divestiture Company LLC Adcom 911 Arvada, City of Boulder, County of CHEETAH ACCESS TECHNOLOGIES, INC Castle Rock, Town of — Utilities City of Aurora City of Aurora, Water Department Clearwire Spectrum Holdings II; LLC Colorado RSA No. 3 Limited Partnership Commnet Four Corners, LLC DENVER, CITY AND COUNTY OF Denver Educational Broadcasting Inc. ENTRAVISION HOLDINGS, LLC Eastern Colorado Independent Networks El Paso County InformationTechnologies Elbert County School District C—1 FiberTower Network Services Corp. Intermountain Rural Electric Association International Communications Group, Inc. LAKEWOOD, CITY OF LP Broadband, Inc. MESA NETWORKS, INC METROPOLITAN AREA NETWORKS, INC. MOTOROLA INC National Digital TV Ctr — Comceast Media New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC —Colorado Open Range Communications Frequency Coordination and Interference Analysis Report 0170872010 Page 1 of 7

Pusblo, City of Compan C_ontinued QWEST CORPORATION RED ROCKS DATA CENTER SUMMIT, COUNTY OF Sangre DeCristo Cellular Inc. Smoky Hill Cellular of Colorado LP Sprint Communications Co., LP State of Colorado Stelera Wireless, LLC Union Telephone Company, Inc. Verizon Wireless — Mountain Region Vyyvx, LLC Vyvx , LLC — Colorado WESTMINSTER CITY COLORADO WISPER TELECOMMUNICATIONS WWC Holding Co., Inc West Metro Fire Protection District Aspen Televigion, LLC BARRINGTON COLORADO SPRINGS LICENSE LLC BETA BROADCASTING, INC. CBS Television Stations COLORADO PUBLIC TELEVISION, INC. KDBI—TV COMMUNITY TV OF COLORADO LICENSE, LLC Comcast of Colorado/Pennsylvania/WV LLC DENVER DIGITAL TELEVISION, LLC Federal Communications Commission - FRONT RANGE EDUCATIONAL MEDIA CORP. FULL GOSPEL OUTREACH, INC. Gray Television Licensee, Inc. Gray Television Licensee, Inc. (KKTV) ION MEDIA DENVER LICENSE, INC. JONES EARTH SEGMENT INC KWGN INC KWGN TV, Inc. MCGRAW—HILL BROADCASTING COMP — KMGH Multimedia Holdings Corporation NBC TELEMUNDO LICENSE CO. PIKES PEAK TELEVISION, INC. _ Pikes Peak Broadcasting Company Inc. ROCKY MOUNTAIN PUBLIC BROADCASTING SANDE FAMILY TRUST SANGRE DE CRISTO COMMUNICATIONS, INC. Sagamorehill Broadcasting of WY N CO LLC Trinity Broadcasting Network Inc Trinity Broadcasting of Denver, Inc. WORD OF GOD FELLOWSHIP, INC. Frequency Coordination and Interference Analysis Report 01/06/2010 Page 2 of 7

Society of Broadcast Engineers Representatives: Colorado —— Front Range Western Slope Kansas — All Except Kansas City Montana — North Central Nebraska — Eastern Area Mid & Western Areas New Mexico — Entire State Texas — Amarillo Abilene Utah —— Salt Lake City Wyoming — Entire State There are no unresolved interference objections with the stations contained in this application. The following section presents the data pertinent to the frequency coordination of the earth station that was circulated to all carriers within its coordination contours. . Frequency Coordination and Interference Analysis Report 01/06/2010 Page 3 of 7

COMSEARCH _ Earth Station Data Sheet 19700 Janelia Farm Boulevard, Ashburn, VA 20147 {703)726—5500 http://www.comsearch.com Date: 01/06/2010 Job Number: 091229COMSJICO5 Administrative Information Status TEMPORARY (Operation from 02/02/2010 to 08/02/2010) Call Sign TEMPO8 Licensee Code P4350 Licensee Name Panamsat Licensee Corp. Site Information CASTLE ROCK, COLORADO Venue Name Latitude (NAD 83) 39° 16‘ 38.0" N Longitude (NAD 83) 104° 48‘ 26.9" W Climate Zone A Rain Zone 2 Ground Elevation (AMSL) 2087.88 m / 6850.0 ft Link Information Satellite Type Geostationary Mode TR — Transmit—Receive Modulation No Modulation Satellite Arc 48° W to 48° West Longitude Azimuth Range 112.5° to 112.5° Corresponding Elevation Angles 16.7°/16.7° Antenna Centerline (AGL) ©8.23 m / 27.0 ft Antenna Information Receive Transmit Manufacturer NEC NEC Model 12.5 Meter ) 12.5 Meter Gain / Diameter 62.0 dBi / 12.5 m 64.0 dBi / 12.5 m 3—dB / 15—dB Beamwidth 0.14° / 0.26° 0.11° / 0.20° Max Available RF Power (dBW/4 kHz) —2.3 (dBW/MHz) 21.7 Maximum EIRP (dBW/4 kHz) 61.7 (dBW/MHz) 85.0 (dBW) 85.0 Interference Objectives: Long Term —156.0 dBwW/MHz 20% —151.0 dBW/4 kHz . 20% Short Term —146.0 dBwW/MHz 0.01% —128.0 dBW/4 kHz 0.0025% Frequency Information Receive 11.0 GHz Transmit 14.0 GHz Emission / Frequency Range (MHz) 150KNON / 10700.0 — 11450.0 850KNON / 12750.0 — 12762.0 150KNON / 11700.0 — 12200.0 8B5OKNON / 12788.0 — 13250.0 850KNON / 13750.0 — 13772.0 850KNON / 13778.0 — 14000.0 850KNON / 14000.0 — 14500.0 Max Great Circle Coordination Distance 288.0 km / 179.0 mi 190.0 km / 118.0 mi Precipitation Scatter Contour Radius 504.6 km / 313.5 mi 126.1 km / 78.3 mi Frequency Coordination and Interference Analysis Report 01106/2010 Page 4 of 7

| | COMSEARCH Earth Station Data Sheet 19700 Janelia Farm Boulevard, Ashburn, VA 20147 {703)726—5500 http://www.comsearch.com Coordination Values CASTLE ROCK, CO Licensee Name / Panamsat Licensee Corp. . Latitude (NAD 83) 39° 16‘ 38.0" N Longitude (NAD 83) 104° 48‘ 26.9" W Ground Elevation (AMSL) 2087.88 m / 6850.0 ft Antenna Centerline (AGL) 8.23 m / 27.0 ft Antenna Model NEC 12.5 Meter Antenna Mode Receive 11.0 GHz Transmit 14.0 GHz Interference Objectives: Long Term —156.0 dBW/MHz 20% —151.0 dBW/4 kHz 20% Short Term —146.0 dBW/MHz 0.01% —128.0 dBw/4 kHz 0.0025% Max Available RF Power —2.3 (dBW/4 kHz) Receive 11.0 GHz Transmit 14.0 GHz Horizon Antenna Horizon Coordination Horizon Coordination Azimuth (°) Elevation (°) Discrimination (°) Gain (dBi) Distance (km) Gain (dBi) Distance (km) 0 5.34 112.03 ~10.00 100.00 —10.00 100.00 5 5.54 107.16 —10.00 100.00 —10.00 . 100.00 10 6.06 102.28 —10.00 100.00 —10.00 100.00 15 5.92 97.37 —10.00 100.00 —10.00 100.00 20 6.17 ©92.46 —10.00 100.00 —10.00 100.00 25 5.97 87.54 —10.00 100.00 —10.00 100.00 30 5.19 82.65 ~10.00 100.00 —10.00 —100.00 35 5.21 77.76 —10.00 100.00 —10.00 100.00 40 4.32 72.92 —10.00 106.24 ~10.00 100.00 45 3.59 68.12 —10.00 117.18 —10.00 100.00 50 2.74 63.38 —10.00 130.73 —10.00 100.00 55 2.50 58.62 ~10.00 135.48 —10.00 100.00 60 2.38 53.86 —10.00 138.08 ~10.00 100.00 65 1,27 49.37 —10.00 172.60 —10.00 100.00 70 112 44.76 —9.27 181.28 —9.27 100.00 75 0.30 40.46 —8.18 230.00 —8.18 143.39 80 0.00 36.14 —6.95 245.37 —6.95 157.28 85 0.00 31.85 —5.58 251.95 —5.58 163.91 90 0.00 27.79 —4,10 259.31 —4.10 169.55 95 0.00 24.04 —2.52 267.38 .—2.52 175.52 100 0.23 20.81 —0.85 272.87 —0.85 178.60 105 . 0.00 18.31 0.44 283.29 0.44 186.77 110 0.00 16.93 1.29 288.04 1.29 190.00 115 0.21 16.72 1,42 287.63 1.42 189.43 120 0.25 18.08 0.57 278.43 0.57 181.99 125 0.23 20.81 —0.85 273.45 —0.85 179.17 130 0.43 23.75 —2.39 244.52 —2.39 150.56 135 0.40 27.56 ~4.01 239.64 —4.01 147.98 140 0.47 31.63 —5.50 225.68 —5.50 136.40 145 0.41 35.97 —6.90 225.07 —6.90 137.33 150 0.55 40.37 —8.15 209.32 —8.15 125.56 155 0.83 44.85 —9.29 193.57 —9.29 110.06 160 0.90 49.46 —10.00 186.73 ~10.00 104.98 165 0.99 54.14 —10.00 182.25 —10.00 101.40 170 1.02 58.86 —10.00 181.03 —10.00 100.44 175 0.87 63.63 ~10.00 188.71 —10.00 106.61 180 . 0.81 68.41 —10.00 191.33 —10.00 108.80 185 0.84 73.19 —10.00 190.07 —10.00 107.75 Frequency Coordination and Interference Analysis Report 01/06/2010 Page 5 of 7

COMSEARCH Earth Station Data Sheet 19700 Janelia Farm Boulevard, Ashburn, VA 20147 (703)726—5500 http://www.comsearch.com Coordination Values CASTLE ROCK, CO Licensee Name Panamsat Licensee Corp. Latitude (NAD 83) 39° 18‘ 38.0" N Longitude (NAD 83) 104° 48‘ 26.9" W Ground Elevation (AMSL) 2087.88 m / 6850.0 ft Antenna Centerline (AGL) 8.23 m / 27.0 ft Antenna Model NEC 12.5 Meter Antenna Mode Receive 11.0 GH Z Transmit 14.0 GHz Interference Objectives: Long Term —156.0 dBW/MHz 20% ~151.0 dBW/4 kHz 20% Short Term —146.0 dBW/MHz 0.01% —128.0 dBW/4 kHz 0.0025% Max Available RF Power —2.3 (dBW/A4 kHz) Receive 11.0 GHz Transmit 14.0 GHz Horizon Antenna Horizon Coordination Horizon Coordination Azimuth (°) Elevation (°) Discrimination (°) Gain (dBi) Distance (km) Gain (dBi) Distance (km) 190 1.34 77.96 —10.00 170.34 ~10.00 © 100.00 195 0.91 82.79 —10.00 186.37 ~10.00 104.69 200 1,25 87.59 —10.00 173.45 —10.00 100.00 205 1.50 92.41 —10.00 162.17 —10.00 100.00 210 2.04 97.25 —10.00 145.52 —10.00 100.00 215 1.55 102.06 —10.00 160.47 —10.00 100.00 220 2.27 . 106.93 —10.00 140.35 —10.00 100.00 225 2.33 111.75 —10.00 139.12 —10.00 100.00 230 2.57 116.60 —10.00 134.00 —10.00 100.00 235 2.49 121.38 —10.00 135.64 —10.00 100.00 240 2.61 126.18 —10.00 133.31 —10.00 100.00 245 2.77 130.96 —10.00 130.22 —10.00 100.00 250 2.85 135.70 —10.00 130.09 —10.00 100.00 255 2.87 ©140.37 —10.00 129.75 —10.00 100.00 260 2.91 144.98 —10.00 128.99 —10.00 100.00 265 3.15 149.56 —10.00 124.69 —10.00 100.00 270 4.08 154.34 —10.00 109.24 —10.00 100.00 275 3.96 158.45 —10.00 110.98 —10.00 100.00 280 3.99 162.22 —10.00 110.43 —10.00 100.00 285 4.25 165.46 —=~10.00 107.09 —10.00 100.00 290 4.50 167.50 —10.00 104.06 —10.00 100.00 295 4.23 167.24 —10.00 107.42 ~10.00 100.00 300 4.25 165.46 —10.00 107.13 —10.00 100.00 305 4.74 162.74 —10.00 101.05 —10.00 100.00 310 5.52 159.31 —10.00 100.00 ~10.00 100.00 315 6.70 155.47 —10.00 100.00 —10.00 100.00 320 7.34 151.05 —10.00 100.00 —10.00 100.00 325 6.91 146.20 —10.00 100.00 —10.00 100.00 330 6.10 141.23 —10.00 100.00 —10.00 100.00 335 5.33 136.28 —10.00 100.00 —10.00 100.00 340 4.90 131.39 —10.00 ©100.00 —10.00 100.00 345 4.79 ©126.55 —10.00 100.51 —10.00 100.00 350 4.81 ©121.71 —10.00 100.19 —10.00 100.00 355 5.12 116.89 —10.00 100.00 —10.00 100.00 ~ Frequency Coordination and Interference Analysis Report 01/06/2010 Page 6 of 7

Certification 1 hereby certify that I am the technically qualified person responsible for the preparation of the frequency coordination data contained in this report. | am familiar with Parts 101 and 25 of the FCC Rules and Regulations and | have either prepared or reviewed the frequency coordination data submitted with this report, and that it is complete and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. 3%“6 E. Cou/la»r" Jeffrey E. Cowles Principal Frequency Planner COMSEARCH 19700 Janelia Farm Bivd. Ashburn, Va. 20147 DATED: January 6, 2010 Frequency Coordination and Interference Analysis Report 01/06/2010 Page 7 of 7

EXHIBIT E PANAMSAT LICENSEE CORP. SPECIAL TEMPORARY AUTHORITY REQUEST _EARTH STATION KL—92 IJOT SERVICES FOR INTELSAT 16 SATELLITE JANUARY 15, 2010

Exhibit FCC Form 312, Response to Question 36: Cancelled Authorizations PanAmSat Licensee Corp. has never had an FCC license "revoked." However, on June 26, 2000, the International Bureau "cancelled" two Ka—band satellite authorizations issued to PanAmSat Licensee Corp. based on the Bureau‘s finding that PanAmSat Licensee Corp. had not satisfied applicable construction milestones. See PanAmSat Licensee Corp., Memorandum Opinion and Order, DA 00—1266, 15 FCC Red 18720 (IB 2000). In that same order, the Bureau denied related applications to modify the cancelled authorizations. PanAmSat Licensee Corp. filed an application for review of the Bureau‘s decision, which the Commission denied, and subsequently filedan appeal with the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, which was —dismissed in January 2003 at PanAmSat Licensee Corp.‘s request. Notwithstanding the fact that the Bureau‘s action does not seem to be the kind of revocation action contemplated by question 36, PanAmSat Licensee Corp. is herein making note of the decision in the interest of absolute candor and out of an abundance of caution. In any event, the Bureau‘s action with respect to PanAmSat Licensee Corp. does not reflect on PanAmSat Licensee Corp‘s basic qualifications, which are well—established and a matter of public record.


Document Created: 2010-01-14 21:25:28
Document Modified: 2010-01-14 21:25:28
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC