Attachment ViaSat Filing

ViaSat Filing

LETTER submitted by ViaSat

ViaSat 9/24-08 Filing

2008-09-24

This document pretains to SES-STA-20080811-01049 for Special Temporal Authority on a Satellite Earth Station filing.

IBFS_SESSTA2008081101049_666828

555 Eleventh Street, N.W., Suite 1000 Washington, D.C. 20004—1304 Tel: +1.202.637.2200 Fax: +1.202.637.2201 www.lw.com FIRM / AFFILIATE OFFICES L AT H A M &WAT K l N S LLP Barcelona New Jersey Brussels New York Chicago Northern Virginia Dubai Orange County Frankfurt Paris Hamburg Rome Hong Kon San Diego September 24, 2008 o nong 0o London San Francisco Los Angeles Shanghai Madrid Silicon Valley Ms. Marlene H. Dortch Milan Singapore Moscow Tokyo Secretar Y Munich Washington, D.C. Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, SW Washington, DC 20554 Re: Application of Row 44, Inc. for Authority to Operate up to 1,000 Technically— Identical Aeronautical—Mobile Satellite Service Transmit/Receive Earth Stations Aboard Commercial and Private Aircraft FCC File Nos. SES—LIC—20080508—00570; SES—AMD—20080619—00826; SES— AMD—20080819—01074; SES—AMD—20080829—01117; Call Sign: E080100 Application of Row 44, Inc. for Special Temporary Authority FCC File No. SES—STA—20080811—01049; Call Sign EQO80100 Dear Ms. Dortch: ViaSat, Inc. ("ViaSat") submits into the record of these proceedings the enclosed letter dated September 18, 2008, which ViaSat has filed in a related proceeding (SES—STA—20080711— 00928). The application and STA proceedings captioned above rely on technical information contained in two substantive amendments that currently are on Public Notice for comment (until October 10, 2008). See Public Notice, Report No. SES—01066 (Sep. 10, 2008). The Commission has required these amendments because Row 44‘s prior submissions have been deficient. ViaSat‘s forthcoming comments will detail the continuing technical problems and deficiencies with Row 44‘s new amendments. ViaSat urges the Commission to consider the information contained in the enclosed letter, and, before taking any further action in these matters, including granting STA, to allow members of the public to scrutinize fully Row 44‘s recent amendments.

Ms. Marlene H. Dortch September 24, 2008 Page 2 LATHAMsWATKINSu Sincerely yours, 4C P. Janka Jarrett S. Taubman Counselfor ViaSat, Inc. CC. Helen Domenici Robert Nelson Fern Jarmulnek Karl Kensinger Andrea Kelly Scott Kotler Sophie Arrington Jeanette Spriggs David S. Keir, Counsel for Row 44, Inc.

ATTACHMENT A

555 Eleventh Street, N.W., Suite 1000 Washington, D.C. 20004—1304 Tel: +1.202.637.2200 Fax: +1.202.637.2201 www.lw.com * FIRM / AFFILIATE OFFICES L AT H A M &WAT K l N S LLP Barcelona New Jersey Brussels New York ED L FCC Chicago Northern Virginia RECE|V Oubai Orange County Frankfurt Paris Hamburg Rome SEP 1 8 2008 Hong Kong San Diego September 18, 2008 . Lona gan Franc n\catlons ccmm‘ss‘on ondon an Francisco FederatCommu | office Los Angeles Shanghai Bursali Madrid Silicon Valigy Ms. Helen Domenici Milan Singapore Chief, : International i Bureau Municn Moscow Washington, D.C. Tokyo Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, SW Washington, DC 20554 Re: Row 44, Inc. Request for Special Temporary Authority and Expedited Action; ECC File No. SES—STA—20080711—00928; Call Sign E080100 Dear Ms. Domenici:; On behalf of ViaSat, Inc. ("ViaSat"), we are responding to the letter sent to you by Row 44, Inc. ("Row 44") on September 11, 2008 ("September 11 Letter"). In that letter, Row 44 urges the Bureau to act on Row 44‘s pending request for special temporary authority ("STA") to operate acronautical—mobile satellite service ("AMSS") terminals on commercial and private aircraft —— even though the public comment period with respect to two substantive technical amendmelnts on which its STA request relies has not yet closed, and will not close until October 10, 2008. As detailed below, action on the STA request at this time would be premature at best: 1. Row 44‘s prior submissions have been deficient, and ViaSat‘s forthcoming comments on Row 44‘s recent amendments will detail continuing technical problems and deficiencies that should be considered before any STA issues; and 2. Two independent sources confirm that Row 44 has in fact conducted some of the proposed operations within the United States without having obtained the STA from the Commission that Row 44 seeks. As an initial matter, Row 44 is mistaken when it asserts that Row 44‘s two recent substantive amendments provide the Commission with "all of the data necessary to permit grant of the limited interim authority that Row 44 has sought in the pending STA request[.]" See FCC File Nos. SES—LIC—20080508—00570; SES—AMD—20080819—01074; SES—AMD— 20080829—01117 ("Application"). The amendments wereplaced on public notice on September 10, 2008.

Ms. Helen Domenici September 18, 2008 Page 2 LATHAMeWATKINSur September 11 Letter at 2. Although Row 44 made essentially the same claim in submitting the initial Application, and in response to ViaSat‘s pleadings identifying the deficiencies in that Application, the Commission (i) has twice noted the incomplete nature of the initial Application," (ii) has required Row 44 to file corrective amendments or face dismissal, and (iii) has sought further public comment on the two recent technical amendments filed by Row 44. By the October 10, 2008 comment deadline, ViaSat will address the continued technical deficiencies in Row 44‘s amendments, which should be taken into account if and when the Commission gives further consideration to Row 44‘s pending request to test its nascent technology on aircraft." More troubling, however, are recent reports that Row 44 has been operating at least one of its terminals on an aircraft without having received Commission authority to do so." While Row 44‘s September 4, 2008 letter to the Bureau ("September 4 Letter") acknowledged that Row 44 needed STA to conduct demonstrations in connection with the recent World Airline Entertainment Association trade show in California,® it appearsthat Row 44 went ahead with those very demonstrations even in the absence of Bureau action on the pending STA request. At least two independent sources confirm that Row 44 transmitted signals to and from spacecraft over a Row 44 terminal mounted on a Row 44 sea plane. Mary Kirby, author of the Runway Girl blog published by Flight, the world‘s leading provider of aerospace news and data, notes that she sent herself an email while aboard a seaplane "equipped with Row 44‘s in—flight connectivity service," which "floated happily on the waters off of Long Beach before our flight."" KNBC(TV) reports that tests were conducted from the Van Nuys, California airport, and in fact includes footage of a demonstration of Row 44‘s technology.‘ Thus, the "initial See Letter from Scott A. Kotler, Chief, Systems Analysis Branch, Satellite Division, International Bureau to Counsel for Row 44 (Aug. 7, 2008); Letter from Scott A. Kotler, Chief, Systems Analysis Branch, Satellite Division, International Bureau to Counsel for Row 44 (Aug. 25, 2008). Row 44 mischaracterizes ViaSat‘s position when Row 44 suggests that its STA request should be granted because ViaSat has "expressed as a key concern that ‘transmit/receive flight testing of [Row 44‘s] proposed antenna‘ should be conducted prior to grant," September 11 Letter at 2. While the lack of guch testing is problematic, a more fundamental problem is that the analysis Row 44 has presented to the Commission is incomplete and internally inconsistent. Row 44 should not receive any authority to operate on aircraft unless and until it has presented a cogent and complete written technical analysis that withstands Commission scrutiny. Row 44‘s existing STA is limited to a single terminal at a manufacturer‘s facility in Amherst, New Hampshire. See FCC File No. SES—STA—20071121—01610. September 4 Letter at 2. See Mary Kirby, A whale ofa good time aboard Row 44‘s Albatros seaplane (Sep. 8, 2008) available at http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/runway—girl/2008/09/a—whale—of—a— good—time—aboard.html (attached as Exhibit 1). 7 KNBC News, Wireless Access at 35,000 Feet (Sep. 10, 2008), available at http://video.knbc.com/player/?id=645225 (screen shot attached as Exhibit 2).

Ms. Helen Domenici September 18, 2008 Page 3 LATHAMsWATKINSu stage" of testing using "one to two aircraft—mounted antenna," which Row 44 represents would follow grant of STA, appears already to have occurred.* Row 44‘s history of presenting incomplete and internally inconsistent information to the Commission highlights the need for public comment on Row 44‘s recent technical amendments, before the Commission may even consider authorizing the proposed STA operations. Particularly considering that Row 44 already has conducted demonstrations, without authorization, it is entirely appropriate to wait just a few more weeks (until the October 10, 2008 pleading deadline) before taking any further action on this STA request. Indeed, Row 44‘s unauthorized operations of a terminal on its own sea plane raise material issues about Row 44‘s compliance with the Commission‘s rules and its candor before the Commission that can and should be examined in the meantime. For these reasons, ViaSat urges the Bureau to allow the public to comment on Row 44‘s recent technical amendments, and to allow its own staff the opportunity to scrutinize those comments, as well as the information provided in this letter, before acting on either Row 44‘s STA request or the amended Application. et}f— Sincerely yours, Jarrett S. Taubman Counselfor ViaSat, Inc. ce: Robert Nelson Fern Jarmulnek Karl Kensinger Andrea Kelly Scott Kotler Sophie Arrington Jeanette Spriggs David S. Keir, Counsel for Row 44, Inc. September 11 Letter at 2.

EXHLBIT 1: MAERY KIRBY REPORT

{Please enter your search term I Home ‘ Premium ‘ Archive | Video | images | Forum I Blogs ‘ Jobs I Shop Search this blog A whale of a good time aboard Row 44‘s Albatros seaplane | [ By Mary Kirby on September 8, 2008 11:36 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0) | ShareThis Recent Entries Chatter boxes: A Podcast discussion from WAEA Hello fair readers, A whale of a good time aboard . Row 44‘s Albatros seaplane I‘m sending this email from a Grumman Albatros seaplane that has been equipped with Swallowing at a price Row 44‘s in—flight connectivity service. Row 44 in June acquired the 1952—built aircraft, Shov:tme the money, says IFE originally used by the US Air Force, for use as expe . . a testbed of its high—speed service. Bombardier CSeries order talk http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/runway—girl/2008/09/a—whale—of—a—good—time—aboard.htm19/18/2008

PHOTO: Bombardier confirms The company completely redid the avionics, CRJ1000 first flight and is in the process of modernizing the leather interior (although, from my roomy seat, UPDATE: Bombardier CRJ1000 the inside is pretty damn swanky for a 56—year old bird). does Mirabel fly by BREAKING: Bombardier So why an Albatros testbed? Row 44 discovered that the curvature atop the fuselage is CRJ1000 first flight today the same as the top of a Boeing 737. How low can you go — air fares then and now The radome that contains the AeroSat—made antenna and the ring fit snugly on top of the The Canadian shuffle — Newair and old air, Zoom aircraft. Alaska Airlines and Southwest Airlines are each planning to trial the system on 737s. Alaska‘s trial will occur in a few weeks. Nice! Recent Assets Mary That‘s the email | sent to myself today while the seaplane floated happily on the waters off of Long Beach before our flight. California—based Row 44 has been successfully demonstrating it‘s Ku band—based in—fli ht connectlwtyservice over Canadian skies but is awaiting forthcoming US e ues : _fzfl * approvals to do its flight testing closer to home. Seasoned pilot Dave Cummings installed the new avionics (Dynon and Garmin) in 21 days and managed to get the aircraft certified within two months. Is that a record? In any case, the flight was quite memorable, not least of all because we flew over a whale while it was using its blow hole. He nearly stole the show, but not quite. Categories: Air Transport, In—flight Entertainment/Communications Tags: Aircraft Interiors Expo, Alaska Airlines, Boeing 737, Dynon, Garmin, Grumman Albatros, Long Beach, Row 44, seaplane, Southwest Airlines, WAEA, World Airline Entertainment Association 0 TrackBacks Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: A whale of a good time aboard Row 44‘s Alliod Dilnte Asemnmiatinm http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/runway—girl/2008/09/a—whale—of—a—good—time—aboard.htm|l 9/18/2008

EXHIBIT 2: KNBC(TV) REPORT

KSJBE,QQM * TV «1058 ANGELES Site Index Categories : Search Videos Home KNBC Video News NEWS Olympic Zone As Seen on NBC4 HEALTH Most Popular Stories Weather Forecast ENTERTAINMENT Traffic Report Entertainment COOL STUFF Sports News Health GREEN Contests Photo Galleries Politics Blogs About This Video ‘ Other Videos Green is Universal Wireless Access At 35,000 Feet Most Watched Community Events Sept. 10, 2008 Financial News John Cadiz Kilemack reports on Row 44. Rate this video Most Shared §http://video.knbc.com/player/?id=645225 Most Recent Family . Education 2 ratings Employment Food House & Home Comments http://video.knbc.com/player/?id=6452259/18/2008


Document Created: 2008-09-30 09:36:49
Document Modified: 2008-09-30 09:36:49
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC