Attachment Row,44 Supplement

This document pretains to SES-STA-20080711-00928 for Special Temporal Authority on a Satellite Earth Station filing.

IBFS_SESSTA2008071100928_657609

                                                      @
                             LEVENTHAL SENTER & LERMAN PLLC




                                              July 31, 2008

 DaviD S. Ker                                                                                        E—MAL
(202) 416—6742                                                                               DKEIR@LSL—LAW.COM




 BY HAND

 Ms. Marlene H. Dortch
 Secretary
 Federal Communications Commission
 445 12"" Street, S.W.
 Washington, D.C. 20554

                   Re:    Application of Row 44, Inc. for Special Temporary Authority
                          (File No. SES—STA—20080711—00928; Call Sign E080100)

 Dear Ms. Dortch:

            Row 44, Inc. ("Row 44"), by counsel, hereby submits additional information in
 connection with its request for limited special temporary authority ("STA"). In the above—
 referenced STA application, Row 44 seeks permission beginning tomorrow, August 1, 2008, to
 conduct tests employing up to twelve (12) aircraft Earth station ("AES") antennas operating in
 the 14.05—14.47 GHz transmit and 11.7—12.2 GHz receive bands. The company has sought a
 permanent aeronautical mobile satellite service ("AMSS") blanket license in pending application
 File No. SES—LIC—20080508—00570.

          This letter is being submitted to provide the FCC with some additional information
 concerning the scheduling factors underpinning its request for authority commencing tomorrow,
 August 1. As noted in the Explanatory Statement included in the application, both Alaska
 Airlines ("Alaska") and Southwest Airlines ("Southwest") have contracted with Row 44 for
 provision of AMSS service. Each company desires to conduct tests that will provide a
 demonstration of service quality and availability for the in—flight broadband service and permit
 them to evaluate such matters as passenger uptake and service usage rates. The first of these
 tests is scheduled to begin on or about September 1, 2008.

            In advance of these market and service tests, Row 44 needs to conduct its own
 benchmark technical trials, which it currently plans to begin during the week of August 11, 2008,
 approximately three weeks before the airline service tests. This testing of antenna performance
 would involve the operation initially of a single antenna onboard a private aircraft flown within
 the continental U.S. and communicating at various times via the three geostationary satellites

                              2000 K STREET, NW, SUITE 600, WASHINGTON, DC 20006—1809
                            TELEPHONE 202.429—8970   FAX 202.293.7783   WWWLSL—LAW.COM


                                              &
Ms. Marlene Dortch
July 31, 2008
Page —2—


identified in Row 44‘s application (AMC—9 at 83° W.L., AMC—2 at 101° W.L. and Horizons—1 at
127° W.L.). All communications would be routed through Hughes Network Systems‘ North Las
Vegas Hub Earth station (Call Sign E940460). Antenna performance will be carefully monitored
to ensure that the AES terminals are fully compliant with the FCC‘s rules and operating within
the scope of the coordination agreements covering adjacent satellites (thereby causing no
harmful interference). This will allow Row 44 to evaluate the overall availability and data
transmission rates of the service.

       In order to commence in—flight testing during the week of August 11"", Row 44 requires
sufficient lead time to plan and execute the installation of the onboard antenna, modem, server
and control equipment during the immediately preceding week of August 4, 2008. Working
backwards, an approval on August 1, 2008 is reasonably calculated to meet this timetable.

        Row 44 is, of course, aware that a single Petition to Deny has been filed with respect to
the underlying application upon which the STA request is premised. Row 44 does not believe
that the petition poses any impediment to grant of the requested STA. See STA Application,
Explanatory Statement at 2.

        Should there be any questions regarding this matter, please contact the undersigned
counsel.


                                                       ully submpitt




                                              David S. Kéi
                                                Counsel to Row 44, Inc.



cc: Karl Kensinger, FCC
    Andrea Kelly, FCC
    Scott Kotler, FCC
    John Janka, Counsel to ViaSat



Document Created: 2008-08-05 10:18:13
Document Modified: 2008-08-05 10:18:13

© 2025 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC