Attachment MSV Reply

MSV Reply

REPLY submitted by Mobile Satellite Ventures Subsidiary LLC

MSV Reply

2007-06-04

This document pretains to SES-STA-20070514-00649 for Special Temporal Authority on a Satellite Earth Station filing.

IBFS_SESSTA2007051400649_571842

                                          Before the
                             Federal Communications Commission
                                     Washington, D.C. 20554

 In the matter of




                                       Newe Ns Nss Nume! Ne Nee Neue! Nuue! Nume! Nued! SNwer Ne un Neue! New! SNuwt! Naat! Nust!
 SkyWave Mobile Communications,                                                                                                     SES—STA—20070516—00666 (Call Sign EO30055)
 Inc.

— Stratos Communications, Inc.                                                                                                      SES—STA—20070514—00648 (Call Sign EO0O0180)
                                                                                                                                    SES—STA—20070514—00649   (Call   Sign E010047)
                                                                                                                                    SES—STA—20070514—00650   (Call   Sign E0O10048)
                                                                                                                                    SES—STA—20070514—00652   (Call   Sign EO10049)
                                                                                                                                    SES—STA—20070514—00653   (Call   Sign EO10050)

 Telenor Satellite Inc.                                                                                                             SES—STA—20070509—00587   (Call   Sign EO00285)
                                                                                                                                    SES—STA—20070509—00591   (Call   Sign EO0O0283)
                                                                                                                                    SES—STA—20070509—00592   (Call   Sign EO00282)
                                                                                                                                    SES—STA—20070509—00595   (Call   Sign E000280)
                                                                                                                                    SES—STA—20070509—00597   (Call   Sign KA313)
                                                                                                                                    SES—STA—20070509—00600   (Call   Sign EO0O0284)
                                                                                                                                    SES—STA—20070509—00601   (Call   Sign WB36)


             REPLY OF MOBILE SATELLITE VENTURES SUBSIDIARY LLC

        Mobile Satellite Ventures Subsidiary LLC ("MSV") hereby files this Reply to the Joint

 Response of SkyWave Mobile Communications, Inc. ("SkyWave"), Stratos Communications,

 Inc. ("Stratos"), Telenor Satellite Inc. ("Telenor"), and Inmarsat Ventures Limited ("Inmarsat")

 to MSV‘s Comments on the above—captioned requests for an eighth 60—day renewal of existing

 grants of Special Temporary Authority ("STA") to operate earlier—generation mobile earth

 terminals using the uncoordinated Inmarsat 4F2 satellite at 52.75° W.L.‘ As MSV explained in

 its Comments, the Bureau should continue to apply the conditions imposed on the original STA

 grants for earlier—generation services as well as (i) immediately require Inmarsat to cease its use



  ‘ See Joint Response of SkyWave Mobile Communications, Inc., Stratos Communications Inc.,
 Telenor Satellite Inc., and Inmarsat Ventures Limited (May 31, 2007) ("Joint Response"); see
 also Mobile Satellite Ventures Subsidiary LLC, Comments (May 18, 2007) ("MSY Comments").


of thé loaned frequencies and (i1) establish a firm expiration date for these STAs without

Inmarsat having completed coordination of the Inmarsat 4F2 satellite with the United States.

       In the Joint Response, Inmarsat and its distributors claim that use of the Inmarsat 4F2

satellite for earlier—generation services has not resulted in interference. J;int Response at 1—2.

In fact, the opposite is true. Inmarsat and its distributors continue to refuse to relinguish the

loaned frequencies despite the harm that is being caused to MSV and its customers. MSF

Comments, Attachment at 2—4. This harm is occurring today by precluding MSV from using

these frequencies to sfipport existing customers, including MSV s unique satellite—based push—to—

talk ("PTT") service which offers critical communications capabilities to first responders when

terrestrial infrastructure is impaired. Id. at 2. As MSV noted in its Comments, public safety



> In the Joint Response, Inmarsat and its distributors incorporate various pleadings by reference.
Joint Response at 1—2. MSV hereby incorporates by reference the following pleadings. See
Letter from Jennifer A. Manner, MSV, to Ms. Marlene H. Dortch, FCC, File No. SES—MFS—
20051122—01614 (Call Sign E000180) et al. (June 20, 2006); Letter from Ms. Jennifer A.
Manner, MSV, to Ms. Marlene H. Dortch, FCC, File No. SES—MFS—20051122—01614 et al. (July
18, 2006) (responding to the Opposition of Inmarsat and its distributors to MSV‘s request that, to
the extent the Commission grants the pending applications to operate with the uncoordinated
Inmarsat 4F2 satellite despite the facts that (1i) harmful interference will likely occur, (ii) grant of
the applications prior to a coordination agreement is inconsistent with precedent, (iii) grant will
condone Inmarsat‘s usurpation of spectrum coordinated by the United States and Canada as well
as Inmarsat‘s continued abdication of its obligation to coordinate its satellites internationally, and
(iv) grant would endorse the current inefficient, non—contiguous assignment of L band
frequencies, then the Commission should attach certain conditions intended to mitigate some of
this harm); Letter from Jennifer A. Manner, MSV, to Mr. John Giusti and Mr. Julius Knapp,
FCC (June 20, 2006); Letter from Ms. Jennifer A. Manner, MSV, to Ms. Marlene H. Dortch,
FCC, Call Signs EQO10011 et al. (July 18, 2006) (responding to the Opposition of Inmarsat and its
distributors to MSV‘s request that the Commission preclude Inmarsat from using frequencies
licensed to and coordinated for MSV and MSV Canada); Mobile Satellite Ventures Subsidiary
LLC, Petition to Hold in Abeyance, File No. SES—MFS—20060118—00050 et al. (March 3, 2006);
Reply of MSV, File No. SES—MFS—20060118—00050 et al. (March 28, 2006) (responding to
Inmarsat‘s Opposition to MSV s Petition to Hold in Abeyance Telenor Satellite Inc.‘s
application to provide non—BGAN Inmarsat service over Inmarsat 4F2); Comments of MSV, File
No. SES—STA—20060710—01131 et al. (July 17, 2006); Response of MSV, File No. SES—STA—
20060710—01131 et al. (August 11, 2006); Comments of MSV, File No. SES—STA—20060511—
00788 et al. (May 15, 2006).


users have been particularly harmed by Inmarsat‘s refusal to return the loaned frequencies. Id. at

2. For example, the Commonwealth of Kentucky‘s Division of Emergency Management, an

MSV user, has informed the Commission that there is a significant risk that Inmarsat‘s

uncoordinatéd operations will "interfere with our existing critical public safety operations" and

that the loaned frequencies are "required for MSV to develop new and innovative service for

public safety users, including additional services that further improve interoperable

communications.""     Inmarsat and its distributors do not refute the impact their usurpation of L

band frequencies is having on MSV and MSV Canada and their customers. Moreover, as MSV

explained previously, there is no analytical, statistical, or other evidence in the record of this or

any other proceeding to support Inmarsat‘s alleged need for the loaned frequencies.* As such,

Inmarsat‘s refusal to return these frequencies is causing harm to MSV and MSV Canada and

their customers without any apparent benefit for Inmarsat‘s users.

       In its Comments, MSV requested that the Bureau provide a clear expiration date for these

STAs unless Inmarsat has completed coordination of its new and relocated Inmarsat satellites,

including rebanding of L band spectrum into more contiguous frequency blocks, which will

reduce the potential for harmful interference and promote efficient use of spectrum. MSY

Comments, Attachment at 4—6. In response, Inmarsat and its distributors cite previous filings in

which Inmarsat claimed that rebanding should be resolved during the L band coordination

process. Joint Response at 2. MSV agrees and once again invites Inmarsat to engage in

coordination discussions. Commission action to facilitate rebanding, however, will in no way

> See Letter from Commonwealth of Kentucky‘s Division of Emergency Management to Ms.
Marlene H. Dortch, FCC, File No. SES—LFS—20050826—01175 et al. (July 24, 2006); see also
Letter from Southwest Texas Regional Advisory Council for Trauma to Ms. Marlene H. Dortch,
FCC, File No. SES—LFS—20050826—01175 et al. (July 17, 2006).
* See MSY Comments, Attachment at 4; Comments of MSV, File No. SES—STA—20060710—01131
et al. (July 17, 2006), at 3—4.


trump the international coordination process. Rather, such action will establish that the

Commission expects L band operators to seek to maximize the potential of the L band for

offering broadband services, which Chairman Martin explained is the Commission‘s top

priority." If, however, the Bureau continues to grant and renew STAs fo;use of Inmarsat‘s

uncoordinated satellites and services without insisting that it first complete coordination, there

are no reasonable prospects that such coordination will ever be successfully completed.

                                          Respectfully submitted,




         %/Z&                                             M%««//
 Br9z€    .Ja;oo‘fis                                    rA Manner
 Tony Lin                                            Vlce
                                                        President, Regulatory Affairs
 PILLSBURY WINTHROP                                  MOBILE SATELLITE VENTURES
      SHAW PITTMAN LLP                                    SUBSIDIARY LLC
 2300 N Street, NW                                   10802 Parkridge Boulevard
 Washington, DC 20037—1128                           Reston, Virginia 20191
 (202) 663—8000                                      (703) 390—2700

Dated: June 4, 2007




° See Remarks of FCC Chairman Kevin J. Martin, Imagining the Digital Healthcare Future in the
Rural West, Montana State University — Bozeman (July 7, 2006) ("Since becoming Chairman
about 16 months ago, I have made broadband deployment the Commission‘s top priority. ..
Broadband technology is a key driver of economic growth. The ability to share increasing
amounts of information, at greater and greater speeds, increases productivity, facilitates interstate
commerce, and helps drive innovation. But perhaps most important, broadband has the potential
to affect almost every aspect of our lives.").


                             CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

       I, Sylvia A. Davis, a secretary with the law firm of Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw
Pittman LLP, hereby certify that on this 4°" day of June 2007, served a true copy of the
foregoing by first—class United States mail, postage prepaid, upon the following:


Diane J. Cornell                                  John P. Janka
Vice President, Government Affairs                Jeffrey A. Marks
Inmarsat, Inc.                                    Latham & Watkins LLP
1101 Connecticut Avenue NW                        555 Eleventh Street, N.W.
Suite 1200                                        Suite 1000
Washington, DC 20036                              Washington, DC 20004

Alfred M. Mamlet                                  Keith H. Fagan
Steptoe & Johnson LLP                             Telenor Satellite, Inc.
1330 Connecticut Avenue N.W.                      1101 Wootton Parkway
Washington, D.C. 20036                             10°"" Floor
                                                  Rockville, MD 20852
Counsel for Stratos Communications, Inc.,
SkyWave Mobile Communications, Corp., and
Satamatics, Inc.

Ani Tourian
SkyWave Mobile Communications, Corp. _
1145 Innovation Drive, Unit 288
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K2K 3G8




                                                   ltz ie /{ /g——
                                                   " Sflvia A. Davis



Document Created: 2007-06-05 11:19:26
Document Modified: 2007-06-05 11:19:26

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC