Attachment Narrative

This document pretains to SES-MOD-20181219-03615 for Modification on a Satellite Earth Station filing.

IBFS_SESMOD2018121903615_1591594

                                    Before the
                      FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
                               Washington, DC 20554

In the Matter of

    Application of KVH Industries, Inc. to           )
    Modify Existing C-band Earth Station             )   Call Sign E120061
    Onboard Vessels (“ESV”) Blanket                  )   File No. SES-MOD-____________
    License                                          )


                     APPLICATION FOR LICENSE MODIFICATION

          By this application, KVH Industries, Inc. (“KVH”) seeks to modify its existing C-

band earth station onboard vessel (“ESV”) blanket license, Call Sign E120061,1 by

adding an emission designator to its previously licensed TracPhone Model V11 (“V11”)

ESV terminal and by including authority for the V11 terminal to operate with satellites on

the Commission’s Permitted Space Station List (“Permitted List”).2

    I.      DISCUSSION

          Under its current license, KVH is authorized to operate up to 500 V11 terminals to

communicate with the INTELSAT 707˚ at 53 W.L. and INTELSAT POR at 180˚ E.L.,

both U.S.-licensed satellites, in the 5.925-6.425 GHz (Earth-to-space) and 3.7-4.2 GHz

(space-to-Earth) bands, using various emission designators.3 Adding the new emission

designator and Permitted List authority for the V11 terminal will improve KVH’s

operational flexibility to provide maritime communications applications to private,



1
 See KVH Industries, Inc., Radio Station Authorization, File No. SES-LIC-20120328-00307 (Call
Sign E120061) (“C-Band ESV License”).
2
    See Permitted Space Station List (https://transition.fcc.gov/ib/sd/se/permitted.html).
3
    See C-Band ESV License.


commercial, and government vessels operating in U.S. waters and beyond.

          KVH will continue to operate the V11 terminal within the off-axis EIRP spectral

density limits specified in Section 25.221(a)(1) of the Commission’s Rules. 4 KVH

incorporates by reference the V11 terminal technical information previously submitted

with its original ESV blanket license application.5 Pursuant to Section 25.117(c) of the

Commission’s Rules,6 KVH provides information regarding operational values that have

changed in the attached FCC Form 312 and Schedule B. Out of an abundance of caution,

KVH also provides herein an updated radiation hazard study.7 KVH confirms that V11

terminal operations otherwise will be consistent with the terms, conditions and operational

parameters that are currently authorized under the C-Band ESV License.

          Because the V11 terminals will operate in accordance with the C-band off-axis

EIRP spectral mask set forth in Section 25.221(a)(1), grant of Permitted List authority in

the requested C-band frequencies is permissible.8

          The public interest would be served by grant of this modification because it will

allow KVH to enhance its operational flexibility and provide improved high-speed satellite

broadband services to various U.S. maritime customers. Additionally, because the new

emission complies with the Commission’s two-degree spacing requirements and other ESV




4
    47 C.F.R. § 25.221(a)(1).
5
 See Application for ESV Network License (including FCC Form 312 and Technical Appendix),
File No. SES-LIC-20120328-00307 (Call Sign E120061).
6
    47 C.F.R. § 25.117(c).
7
    See Exhibit 1.
8
    See 47 C.F.R. § 25.221(b)(7).



                                              2


rules and policies, there is no material potential for interference and granting this

authorization is fully consistent with the public interest.

II.    CONCLUSION

       Based on the foregoing, KVH respectfully request that the Commission grant its

request to modify its existing C-Band ESV License, Call Sign E120061, by adding a new

emission designator for its previously licensed V11 terminal and by adding authority for

the terminal to communicate with the Permitted Space Station List.




                                               3


     EXHIBIT 1



Radiation Hazard Study




       4


                                   Radiation Hazard Analysis
                                         KVH Industries
                                          V11-HTS ESV


This analysis predicts the radiation levels around a proposed earth station complex, comprised of
one (reflector) type antennas. This report is developed in accordance with the prediction methods
contained in OET Bulletin No. 65, Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human
Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, Edition 97-01, pp 26-30. The maximum
level of non-ionizing radiation to which employees may be exposed is limited to a power density
level of 5 milliwatts per square centimeter (5 mW/cm2) averaged over any 6 minute period in a
controlled environment and the maximum level of non-ionizing radiation to which the general
public is exposed is limited to a power density level of 1 milliwatt per square centimeter (1
mW/cm2) averaged over any 30 minute period in a uncontrolled environment. Note that the
worse-case radiation hazards exist along the beam axis. Under normal circumstances, it is highly
unlikely that the antenna axis will be aligned with any occupied area since the antenna will be
mounted high on a vessel’s superstructure and that would represent pointing toward a vessel deck
or towards areas that would block the desired signals, thus rendering the link unusable.

Earth Station Technical Parameter Table
Antenna Actual Diameter               1 meters
Antenna Surface Area                  0.8 sq. meters
Antenna Isotropic Gain                34.5 dBi
Number of Identical Adjacent Antennas 1
Nominal Antenna Efficiency (ε)        67.50%
Nominal Frequency                     6.138 GHz
Nominal Wavelength (λ)                0.0489 meters
Maximum Transmit Power / Carrier      22.0 Watts
Number of Carriers                    1
Total Transmit Power                  22.0 Watts
W/G Loss from Transmitter to Feed     1.0 dB
Total Feed Input Power                17.48 Watts
Near Field Limit                      Rnf = D²/4λ =5.12 meters
Far Field Limit                       Rff = 0.6 D²/λ = 12.28 meters
Transition Region                     Rnf to Rff

In the following sections, the power density in the above regions, as well as other critically
important areas will be calculated and evaluated. The calculations are done in the order discussed
in OET Bulletin 65.

1.0 At the Antenna Surface

The power density at the reflector surface can be calculated from the expression:

 PDrefl = 4P/A = 8.902 mW/cm² (1)
 Where: P = total power at feed, milliwatts
          A = Total area of reflector, sq. cm

In the normal range of transmit powers for satellite antennas, the power densities at or around the
reflector surface is expected to exceed safe levels. This area will not be accessible to the general


                                                                                                   1


public. Operators and technicians should receive training specifying this area as a high exposure
area. Procedures must be established that will assure that all transmitters are rerouted or turned
off before access by maintenance personnel to this area is possible.

2.0 On-Axis Near Field Region

The geometrical limits of the radiated power in the near field approximate a cylindrical volume
with a diameter equal to that of the antenna. In the near field, the power density is neither uniform
nor does its value vary uniformly with distance from the antenna. For the purpose of considering
radiation hazard it is assumed that the on-axis flux density is at its maximum value throughout the
length of this region. The length of this region, i.e., the distance from the antenna to the end of the
near field, is computed as Rnf above.

The maximum power density in the near field is given by:

 PDnf = (16ε P)/(π D²) =     6.009 mW/cm² (2)
                             from 0 to 5.12 meters
Evaluation
 Uncontrolled Environment:        Does Not Meet Uncontrolled Limits
 Controlled Environment:          Does not Meet Controlled Limits

3.0 On-Axis Transition Region

The transition region is located between the near and far field regions. As stated in Bulletin 65,
the power density begins to vary inversely with distance in the transition region. The maximum
power density in the transition region will not exceed that calculated for the near field region, and
the transition region begins at that value. The maximum value for a given distance within the
transition region may be computed for the point of interest according to:

 PDt =       (PDnf)(Rnf)/R = dependent on R (3)
 where:      PDnf = near field power density
             Rnf = near field distance
             R = distance to point of interest
 For:        5.12 < R < 12.3 meters

We use Eq (3) to determine the safe on-axis distances required for the two occupancy conditions:

Evaluation

 Uncontrolled Environment Safe Operating Distance,(meters), Rsafeu:          30.7
 Controlled Environment Safe Operating Distance,(meters), Rsafec:            6.1

4.0 On-Axis Far-Field Region

The on- axis power density in the far field region (PDff) varies inversely with the square of the
distance as follows:




                                                                                                     2


 PDff = PG/(4πR²) = dependent on R (4)
 where: P = total power at feed
        G = Numeric Antenna gain in the direction of interest relative to isotropic radiator
        R = distance to the point of interest
 For: R > Rff = 12.3 meters
        PDff = 2.574 mW/cm² at Rff

We use Eq (4) to determine the safe on-axis distances required for the two occupancy conditions:

Evaluation

 Uncontrolled Environment Safe Operating Distance,(meters), Rsafeu :       See Section 3
 Controlled Environment Safe Operating Distance,(meters), Rsafec :         See Section 3

5.0 Off-Axis Levels at the FarField Limit and Beyond

In the far field region, the power is distributed in a pattern of maxima and minima (sidelobes) as a
function of the off-axis angle between the antenna center line and the point of interest. Off-axis
power density in the far field can be estimated using the antenna radiation patterns prescribed for
the antenna in use. Usually this will correspond to the antenna gain pattern envelope defined by
the FCC or the ITU, which takes the form of:

 Goff = 32 - 25log(Θ)
 for Θ from 1 to 48 degrees; -10 dBi from 48 to 180 degrees
 (Applicable for commonly used satellite transmit antennas)

Considering that satellite antenna beams are aimed skyward, power density in the far field will
usually not be a problem except at low look angles. In these cases, the off axis gain reduction may
be used to further reduce the power density levels.

For example: At one (1) degree off axis At the far-field limit, we can calculate the power density
as:

Goff = 32 - 25log(1) = 32 - 0 dBi = 1585 numeric

 PD1 deg off-axis = PDffx 1585/G = 14.629 mW/cm² (5)

6.0 Off-Axis power density in the Near Field and Transitional Regions

According to Bulletin 65, off-axis calculations in the near field may be performed as follows:
assuming that the point of interest is at least one antenna diameter removed from the center of the
main beam, the power density at that point is at least a factor of 100 (20 dB) less than the value
calculated for the equivalent on-axis power density in the main beam. Therefore, for regions at
least D meters away from the center line of the dish, whether behind, below, or in front under of
the antenna's main beam, the power density exposure is at least 20 dB below the main beam level
as follows:

 PDnf(off-axis) = PDnf /100 = 0.06009 mW/cm² at D off axis (6)




                                                                                                  3


See Section 8 for the calculation of the distance vs. elevation angle required to achieve this rule
for a given object height.

7.0 Region Between the Feed Horn and Sub-reflector

Transmissions from the feed horn are directed toward the subreflector surface, and are confined
within a conical shape defined by the feed horn. The energy between the feed horn and
subreflector is conceded to be in excess of any limits for maximum permissible exposure. This
area will not be accessible to the general public. Operators and technicians should receive training
specifying this area as a high exposure area. Procedures must be established that will assure that
all transmitters are rerouted or turned off before access by maintenance personnel to this area is
possible.

8.0 Evaluation of Safe Occupancy Area in Front of Antenna

The distance (S) from a vertical axis passing through the dish center to a safe off axis location in
front of the antenna can be determined based on the dish diameter rule (Item 6.0). Assuming a flat
terrain in front of the antenna, the relationship is:

 S = (D/ sin α) + (2h - D - 2)/(2 tan α) (7)
 Where: α = minimum elevation angle of antenna
         D = dish diameter in meters
         h = maximum height of object to be cleared, meters

For distances equal or greater than determined by equation (7), the radiation hazard will be below
safe levels for all but the most powerful stations (> 4 kilowatts RF at the feed).

   For          D=           1 meters
                h=           2.0 meters
   Then:
                α            S
                23           10.0 meters
                25           3.4meters
                30           2.9 meters
                35           2.5 meters
                40           2.2 meters

Suitable barrier and signage should be provided to prevent casual occupancy of the area in front
of the antenna within the limits prescribed above at the lowest elevation angle required, although
this is highly unlikely given the installation of the antenna high on a vessel’s superstructure.

Summary

The earth station site will be protected from uncontrolled access with suitable barriers, signage
and personnel instruction. There will also be proper emission warning signs placed and all
operating personnel will be aware of the human exposure levels at and around the earth station.
The applicant agrees to abide by the conditions specified in Condition 5208 provided below:




                                                                                                      4


        Condition 5208 - The licensee shall take all necessary measures to ensure that the
        antenna does not create potential exposure of humans to radiofrequency radiation
        in excess of the FCC exposure limits defined in 47 CFR 1.1307(b) and 1.1310
        wherever such exposures might occur. Measures must be taken to ensure
        compliance with limits for both occupational/controlled exposure and for general
        population/uncontrolled exposure, as defined in these rule sections. Compliance
        can be accomplished in most cases by appropriate restrictions such as fencing.
        Requirements for restrictions can be determined by predictions based on
        calculations, modeling or by field measurements. The FCC's OET Bulletin 65
        (available on-line at www.fcc.gov/oet/rfsafety) provides information on predicting
        exposure levels and on methods for ensuring compliance, including the use of
        warning and alerting signs and protective equipment for workers.

The following table summarizes all of the above calculations:




                                                                                        5


Table — Summaryof All RadHaz Parameters                                        i esy.
Pormeter                              [Abbe                            Unis    |Formin
Dins                                                            Euo
Antenna Diameter                      pr                           1|_meters
Antenna Centerine                     is                         20| meters
Antenna Surface Area.                      Sa                    08 meters® |(m*DFY4
Anterna Ground Elevation                   ce                  380| meters
Frequency ofOpcration                      G                  e138] oif:
Wayddengh                                  h                 00189 meters_|/F
HPA Ouput Power                            Pres                220| wats
HPA to Antenna Loss                        .                     1o| as
Transmit Power at Flange                   o                    124]_dBw _|10 * Lor@re)— L«
                                                              17.48] wans
Antenna Gain                               G..                 315| ani
                                                             2res8| wa
ul                                         m              3.1115027     wia
Antenna Aperture Eficiency               n                   6750%)     na     |G, /@1* DenY
1. Reflector Surface Region Calculations
Reflector Surface Power Density          |PDas                soor) w‘ _|as*Pym*D)
                                                              8.902] mWiem® |Does Not Meet Uncontrolled Limits
                                                                            [Does not Meet Controlled Limits
2. On—Axis Near Field Caleulations
Extent ofNear Field                        Re                   512] meters_D°/(@ 0
                                                               1678] fea
Near Field Power Densiy                    PDat               eon9!    W‘      las* 1 * 2y m °D
                                                              6.009] mWiem® |Does Not Meet Uncontrolled Limits
                                                                            [Does not Meet Controlled Limits
3. On—Axis Transition Region Calculations
Extent ofTransiion Region (min)           Ire                  512] meters_D°/(@ 0
Extent oTransiion Region (min)                                1678] fea
Extent ofTranstion Region (max)           KB                  1228]_metes_|(06* D)/A
Extent oTransiion Region (max)                                1027] fea
Worst Case Transtion Region Power Densiy: |PDrr               eon9!    W‘      las *n *>y* D5
                                                              6.009] mWiem® |Does Not Meet Uncontrolled Limits
                                                                            [Does not Meet Controlled Limits
Uncontalled Emvironment Safe Operaing DismifRsu                 507|   m    |—PDa)*@abRs
Conalled Emironment Safe Operaing DisancdRise                    51|   m    __|—PDab*GabRsc
4. On—Avis Far Field Calculations
Distance t the Far Field Resion             lee                123| _metes |06*D5 A
                                                              1027] x
On—Axis Power Densit in the Far Field      rog                asnal    We‘     |G,tP/@+mtR®)
                                                              2.574] mWicm" |Does Not Meet Uncontrolled Limits
                                                                            [Meets Controlled Limits
5. OffAxis Levels at the Far Field Limit and Beyond
Reflector Surface Power Density            pps                m.e29| Wir‘ |(G,, * P)/(@ * n * RF)*(GonlGeq)
GoalGes at example angle 6 1 degree                            oses           (Goa= 37 — 25tbe®
                                                               1.4629| mWiom® |Meets Controlled Limits
6. Off—axis Power Densityin the Near Field and Transitional Regions Calculations
Power density 1/100 ofWa for one dameer [pps                 oeoo We (a6n n *PY D10
ind                                                         0.06009] mWicm" |Meets Uncontrolled Limits
8. OffAxis Safe Distances from Earth Station                                5— D‘ma + Ch—D — )Gna
@= minimum elevation angle ofantema                              s3] dx
h maximum heightofobject to be ceared, meters                    20( m
GD = Ground Elevation Dela antema—obstacld                       Comn
clevation angle                              ss)                100| m
                                              2s                 54) m
                                              so)                23] m
                                              Es                 23( m
                                              s                  22 m
Note: Masimum FCC power density limis for 6 GHzis 1 mWiemfor general popultion/incontroled expostre as per
ECC OE&T Buletin No. 65, Ediion 97—01 August 1997, Appendx A page 67.



Document Created: 2018-12-19 10:38:14
Document Modified: 2018-12-19 10:38:14

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC