ESOC Response to Row

OTHER submitted by EchoStar Satellite Operating Corporation

Response to Supplemental Showing

2014-01-08

This document pretains to SES-MOD-20121023-00963 for Modification on a Satellite Earth Station filing.

IBFS_SESMOD2012102300963_1032155

8 January 2014

VIA ELECTRONIC FILING

Marlene H. Dortch
Secretary
Federal Communications Commission
445 12th Street, SW
Washington, D.C. 20554


      Re: Call Sign E080100; File Nos. SES-AFS-20130920-00833, SES-MOD-
20121023-00963

Dear Ms. Dortch:

       EchoStar Satellite Operating Corporation (“ESOC, and together with its affiliates,
“EchoStar”) files this letter in response to the Supplemental Showing and Response to
Comments recently submitted by Row 44 Inc. (“Row 44”) for the above referenced
applications.1

        In its applications, Row 44 requested a waiver of the Table of Allocations set
forth in Section 2.106 of the Commission’s rules to permit Row 44’s earth stations to
communicate with Intelsat 19 (“IS-19”) in the 12.25-12.75 GHz band in International
Telecommunication Union (“ITU”) Region 2 on a non-protected, non-interference basis.2
In Comments filed on December 13, 2013, EchoStar asked the Commission to require
Row 44 to submit a technical interference analysis demonstrating that such operations
would not interfere with current and planned Broadcast Satellite Service (“BSS)
operations, which have priority in the 12.25 – 12.75 GHz band in ITU Region 2.3 The


1
 See Letter from David S. Keir, Counsel to Row 44 Inc., to Jose Albuquerque, Chief,
Satellite Division, International Bureau, FCC, filed in File Nos. SES-MOD-20121023-
00963, SES-AFS-20130920-00833 (filed Dec. 23, 2013) (“Supplemental Showing”); see
also Row 44 Inc., Application for Modification of License, File No. SES-MOD-
20121023-00963 (filed Oct. 23, 2012) (“Original Modification”); Row 44 Inc.,
Amendment to Application for Modification of License, File No. SES-AFS-20130920-
00833 (filed Sept. 20, 2013).
2
    See Original Modification, Narrative at 3-4.
3
 EchoStar Satellite Operating Corporation, Comments, filed in File Nos. SES-MOD-
20121023-00963, SES-AFS-20130920-00833 (filed Dec. 13, 2013).


                    100 Inverness Terrace East • Englewood, CO 80112 • Tel: 303.706.4000


Row 44 Supplemental Showing included such an analysis, and EchoStar has since had an
opportunity to review it.

        Based on this review, and under the specific circumstance set forth in Row 44’s
modification, EchoStar has no objection to Row 44’s operations in the 12.25-12.75 GHz
band (Ku band) with the IS-19 satellite at 166° W.L. over ITU Region 2 on a non-
interference, non-protected basis, as long as Row 44’s license is conditioned on ceasing
operations in the unlikely event that its operations cause any interference to the existing
primary service users in the Ku band. EchoStar reiterates that grant of Row 44’s
requested waiver should not be construed so as to establish precedent for more expansive
use of the BSS band for non-conforming uses. BSS operators now and in the future
should be able to plan and design their systems without regard to any non-BSS system or
systems operating under waivers in the priority BSS band.



                                                 Respectfully submitted,

                                                              /s/

                                                 Jennifer A. Manner
                                                 Vice President, Regulatory Affairs
                                                 EchoStar Corporation
                                                 11717 Exploration Lane
                                                 Germantown, MD 20817
                                                 (301) 428-5893
                                                 jennifer.manner@echostar.com

8 January 2014




cc:    Jose Albuquerque
       Stephen Duall
       Kathyrn Medley




                  100 Inverness Terrace East • Englewood, CO 80112 • Tel: 303.706.4000



Document Created: 2014-01-08 15:21:33
Document Modified: 2014-01-08 15:21:33

© 2025 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC