Good afternoon Ms. Lott, 

 

The chart below provides the requested value corrections for the above-referenced modification application for E920419:

 

E28	E51	E52/53	E54/55	E56	E57	E58	E59	E60
1	Geostationary	11700 12200	62.0 / 128.1	133.4	31.0	223.0	32.9	0.0
	Geostationary	14000 14500	62.0 / 128.1	133.4	31.0	223.0	32.9	-7.9

 

Thank you,

Denise

 

Denise A. Branson, Paralegal

1300 N. 17th Street, Suite 1100 | Arlington, VA 22209
Tel: 703.812.0425 | Fax: 703.812.0486

[email protected] | www.fhhlaw.com | www.commlawblog.com

 

From: Eleanor Lott [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2012 4:25 PM
To: Richard Swift
Cc: Trang Nguyen; Eleanor Lott
Subject: SES-MOD-20120707-00636

 

Dear Mr. Swift:

 

The application is under review for acceptability.   However, our study indicates that there are discrepancies in the  listed East/West Elevation angle and East/West Azimuth angle for both the transmit frequencies and receive frequencies with respect to the coordinates at the relocated site.  

 

 Using your proposed earth station north latitude  40 degrees and earth station west longitude 96 degrees and the satellite west longitude of 128 degrees, we get the azimuth angle for the transmit frequencies to be 223.00 degrees. However, you listed the azimuth angle to be 221.3 degrees.    Please correct the East/West azimuth angle.    We note that you listed the Sat Arc for receive frequencies West longitude to be 128.1 W whereas the Sat Arc for transmit frequencies West longitude to be 128.0 W.  You need to correct that also.

 

Our processing staff will continue to process the application once we receive the corrected information.

 

Best Regards,

Trang Nguyen

FCC

IB/SD/SAB

202 418 2734

 

 

Click here to report this email as spam.