Attachment E050276 Mod-Exhibit1

This document pretains to SES-MOD-20111230-01504 for Modification on a Satellite Earth Station filing.

IBFS_SESMOD2011123001504_931542

Attachment A Radiation Hazard Analysis and Description of New Mobile Earth Terminal

America Report On Maximum Permissible Exposure Evaluation for Hughes Network Systems Land Portable Terminal Model 9202 OET Bulletin 65 Edition 97‐01 including Supplement C Report No. SC1102725F July 2011

TÜV SÜD America Inc., 10040 Mesa Rim Road, San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: (858) 678-1400. Website: www.TUVamerica.com REPORT ON Maximum Permissible Exposure Evaluation for Hughes Network Systems Land Portable Terminal TEST REPORT NUMBER SC1102725F July 2011 PREPARED FOR Hughes Network Systems 9605 Scranton Road, Suite 500, San Diego, CA 92121 PREPARED BY Ferdinand S. Custodio Name Title: EMC/Wireless Test Engineer APPROVED BY Chip R. Fleury Name Authorized Signatory DATED July 18, 2011

FCC ID K3YHNS9202 Report No. SC1102725F CONTENTS Section Page No 1 REPORT SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................3 1.1 Introduction.............................................................................................................................................. 4 1.2 Brief Summary Of Results ......................................................................................................................... 5 1.3 Product Information .................................................................................................................................6 1.4 Eut Test Configuration .............................................................................................................................. 9 1.5 Requirements From The Standard .......................................................................................................... 10 1.6 Deviations From The Standard ................................................................................................................ 12 1.7 Modification Record ............................................................................................................................... 12 1.8 Test Facility ............................................................................................................................................. 12 2 TEST DETAILS .................................................................................................................................... 13 2.1 Prediction Of MPE At A Given Distance................................................................................................... 14 2.2 MPE Evaluation Using Field Probe .......................................................................................................... 16 2.3 Worst Case Co‐Located Exposure Conditions .......................................................................................... 18 3 TEST EQUIPMENT USED .................................................................................................................... 19 3.1 Test Equipment Used.............................................................................................................................. 20 4 PHOTOGRAPHS ................................................................................................................................ 21 4.1 MPE Evaluation test setup using field probe ........................................................................................... 22 5 ACCREDITATION, DISCLAIMERS AND COPYRIGHT .............................................................................. 25 5.1 Accreditation, Disclaimers and Copyright ............................................................................................... 26 Page 2 of 27

FCC ID K3YHNS9202 Report No. SC1102725F SECTION 1 REPORT SUMMARY Maximum Permissible Exposure Evaluation for Hughes Network Systems Land Portable Terminal Page 3 of 27

FCC ID K3YHNS9202 Report No. SC1102725F 1.1 INTRODUCTION The information contained in this report is intended to show compliance of Hughes Network Systems Land Portable Terminal to the requirements of OET Bulletin 65 Edition 97‐01 including Supplement C. Objective To perform verification to determine the Equipment Under Test's (EUT’s) compliance with FCC §1.1307 Subpart I. Manufacturer Hughes Network Systems FCC ID Number K3YHNS9202 Model Number(s) Model 9202 Serial Number(s) 004401‐64‐001017‐5 Number of Samples Tested 1 Test Specification/Issue/Date OET Bulletin 65 Edition 97‐01 including Supplement C (June 2001) Start of Test July 18, 2011 Finish of Test July 18, 2011 Name of Engineer(s) Ferdinand S. Custodio Related Document(s)  Report No: SC1102725A (Part 25 Test Report)  Report No: SC1102725B (Part 15.247 Test Report)  Hughes 9202 User Guide Revision 0.2 (15 July 2011) Page 4 of 27

FCC ID K3YHNS9202 Report No. SC1102725F 1.2 BRIEF SUMMARY OF RESULTS A brief summary of the tests carried out in accordance with OET Bulletin 65 Edition 97‐01 including Supplement C is shown below. CFR Part Description of Antenna Evaluated Evaluation Type Result FCC Part 15.247 2.5dBi WLAN antenna (built‐in with satellite antenna) Calculated Compliant FCC Part 25 L‐Band 12 dB Transportable Satellite antenna Measured Compliant

FCC ID K3YHNS9202 Report No. SC1102725F 1.3 PRODUCT INFORMATION 1.3.1 Technical Description The Equipment Under Test (EUT) was a Hughes Network Systems Land Portable Terminal as shown in the photograph below. The GPS antenna port and the external satellite antenna port will not be available on the final production units. Equipment Under Test Page 6 of 27 TÜV SÜD AMERICA INC 10040 Mesa Rim Road San Diego, CA 92121-2912 Phone: 858 678 1400 FAX: 858 546 0364

FCC ID K3YHNS9202 Report No. SC1102725F 1.3.2 EUT General Description The Hughes 9202 Land Portable terminal operates as an Inmarsat BGAN Class 2 satellite terminal providing packet data and voice communications over Inmarsat’s BGAN (Broadband Global Area Network) constellation of three geo‐stationary I‐4 satellites ‐ see Figure 2. The 9202 terminal will also operate with Inmarsat’s new Alphasat I‐XL extended L‐band satellite when launched in 2012. The Alphasat I‐XL satellite will operate in parallel with the I‐4 satellites, with its coverage centered over Africa and providing additional coverage to Europe, the Middle‐East and parts of Asia. Each I‐4 satellite broadcasts: (i) a single Global beam which broadcasts system information; (ii) 19 Regional beams which are used for access control; (iii) around 200 Narrow beams used for data.  The forward link (from the satellite) is TDM, L‐band 1525 to 1559 MHz.  The return link (to the satellite) is TDMA, L‐band 1626.5 to 1660.5 MHz. The Alphasat I‐XL satellite will provide an extended frequency range operating capability:  Forward: 1518 to 1559 MHz, and  Return: 1626.5 to 1660.5 MHz, and 1668 to 1675 MHz (there is a gap between 1660.5 and 1668). The channel plan is controlled by the network which tells the terminal which channel to use. Channels are up to 200 KHz wide and each 200 KHz sub‐band can be assigned to one terminal or shared between multiple terminals. The system includes closed loop power control, and the terminal also includes power control to maintain Tx power within ± 1dB. The Tx power EIRP is 15.1dBW. The Hughes 9202 Land Portable terminal has an internal satellite antenna with a gain of 12dBi. The return link (to the satellite) bearer types available are described in Figure 1. Bearer Type Modulation Type Channel Spacing Burst Length R20T05Q QPSK 22.22 KHz 20 ms R5T1X 16‐QAM 44.44 KHz 5 ms R20T1X 16‐QAM 44.44 KHz 20 ms R20T1Q QPSK 44.44 KHz 20 ms R5T2X 16‐QAM 88.88 KHz 5 ms R20T2X 16‐QAM 88.88 KHz 20 ms R5T2Q QPSK 88.88 KHz 5 ms R20T2Q QPSK 88.88 KHz 20 ms R5T4.5X 16‐QAM 200 KHz 5 ms R20T4.5X 16‐QAM 200 KHz 20 ms R5T4.5Q QPSK 200 KHz 5 ms R20T4.5Q QPSK 200 KHz 20 ms Figure 1. Return Link Bearer Types The Hughes 9202 Land Portable terminal is designed as a portable unit. It will operate either from its internal rechargeable Li‐Ion battery pack, or from the supplied AC/DC adapter. User connectivity is provided by single Ethernet, ISDN, and POTS ports, and Wi‐Fi via an internal 802.11b WLAN card and antenna, The Ethernet port and Wi‐Fi access provide connection to a computer or wireless device to allow setup and monitoring actions to be performed. The ISDN and POTS port on the 9202 terminal are for connection to an ISDN telephone handset, and POTS telephone handset or Fax; they do not connect to a Telco line, the connection is made over the satellite. Page 7 of 27 TÜV SÜD AMERICA INC 10040 Mesa Rim Road San Diego, CA 92121-2912 Phone: 858 678 1400 FAX: 858 546 0364

FCC ID K3YHNS9202 Report No. SC1102725F An integrated SIM carrier enables a user to insert a SIM card to gain access to authorized Inmarsat services. An internal GPS receiver in the terminal provides location information. To establish a connection with the Inmarsat BGAN network, the user determines the satellite’s position from a GPS fix provided by the terminal. The user then points the terminal with its internal satellite antenna to the satellite’s position, assisted by audio tones and LCD indicators to determine optimal signal strength. Once locked on, the terminal will register with the BGAN network and communications can proceed. Network connectivity is illustrated in Figure 3. Figure 2. Inmarsat BGAN Global Coverage Map with l‐4 Satellites Figure 3. Network Connectivity Page 8 of 27 TÜV SÜD AMERICA INC 10040 Mesa Rim Road San Diego, CA 92121-2912 Phone: 858 678 1400 FAX: 858 546 0364

FCC ID K3YHNS9202 Report No. SC1102725F 1.4 EUT TEST CONFIGURATION 1.4.1 Test Configuration Description for Measured Evaluation Test Description Configuration Stand‐alone testing. Transmitting at max. power, worst case channel/modulation. 1.4.2 EUT Exercise Software “Perl Command” software provided by the client was used to exercise the EUT. A file containing commands to change channels and modulation was also provided. Worst case channel and modulation used during evaluation. Base from Report No: SC1102725A, worst case channel is High Channel (1660.200 MHz) with R20T1X (QAM, 44.44 kHz channel spacing, 20ms burst length) modulation. 1.4.3 Support Equipment and I/O cables Manufacturer Equipment/Cable Description Toshiba Laptop Model Satellite Pro 4600 SN91685670PU Toshiba Laptop External PSU Model PA3049U‐1ACA SN0184957G Logitech Mouse for Laptop Model M‐CAA42 SNLZA21203529 ‐ CAT6 (Laptop to EUT) 2.1m unshielded RJ45 connector 1.4.4 Simplified Test Configuration Diagram for Measured Evaluation Page 9 of 27 TÜV SÜD AMERICA INC 10040 Mesa Rim Road San Diego, CA 92121-2912 Phone: 858 678 1400 FAX: 858 546 0364

FCC ID K3YHNS9202 Report No. SC1102725F 1.5 REQUIREMENTS FROM THE STANDARD As stated in the FCC rules, mobile and portable transmitting devices that operate in the Cellular Radiotelephone Service, the Personal Communications Services (PCS), the Satellite Communications Services, the General Wireless Communications Service, the Wireless Communications Service, the Maritime Services (ship earth stations only) and Specialized Mobile Radio Service authorized, respectively, under Part 22 (Subpart H), Part 24, Part 25, Part 26, Part 27, Part 80, and Part 90 of the FCC rules are subject to routine environmental evaluation for RF exposure prior to equipment authorization or use. Portable devices operating in the Wireless Medical Telemetry Service (WMTS) and the Medical Implant Communications Service (MICS), authorized under Subparts H and I of Part 95 are subject to routine environmental evaluation for RF exposure prior to equipment authorization or use. Unlicensed PCS, U‐NII and millimeter wave devices authorized under Part 15 of FCC rules are also subject to routine environmental evaluation for RF exposure prior to equipment authorization or use. All other mobile and portable devices are categorically excluded from routine environmental evaluation for RF exposure. MOBILE DEVICES The FCC rules for evaluating mobile devices for RF compliance are found in 47 CFR §2.1091. For purposes of RF exposure evaluation, a mobile device is defined as a transmitting device designed to be used in other than fixed locations and to be generally used in such a way that a separation distance of at least 20 centimeters is normally maintained between the transmitter's radiating structures and the body of the user or nearby persons. In this context, the term "fixed location" means that the device, including its antenna, is physically secured at a permanent location and is not able to be easily moved to another location. Examples of mobile devices, as defined above, would include cellular and PCS mobile telephones, other radio devices that use vehicle‐mounted antennas and certain other transportable transmitting devices. Transmitters designed to be used by consumers or workers that can be easily re‐ located, such as a wireless modem operating in a laptop computer, are considered mobile devices if they meet the 20 centimeter separation requirement. These devices are normally evaluated for exposure potential with the MPE limits given in Appendix A. Mobile devices may also be evaluated with respect to the SAR limits given in Appendix A for RF exposure compliance, but in such cases it is usually simpler and more cost‐effective to evaluate compliance with respect to MPE limits based on field strength or power density. PORTABLE DEVICES The FCC rules for evaluating portable devices for RF exposure compliance are contained in 47 CFR §2.1093. For purposes of RF exposure evaluation, a portable device is defined as a transmitting device designed to be used with any part of its radiating structure in direct contact with the user’s body or within 20 centimeters of the body of a user or bystanders under normal operating conditions. This category of devices would include hand‐held cellular and PCS telephones that incorporate the radiating antenna into the hand‐piece and wireless transmitters that are carried next to the body. Portable devices are evaluated with respect to SAR limits for RF exposure.6 The applicable SAR limit for portable transmitters used by consumers is 1.6 watts/kg, which is averaged over any one gram of tissue defined as a tissue volume in the shape of a cube. EXPOSURE CATEGORIES With respect to field strength, power density and SAR requirements, both the 1992 ANSI/IEEE standard and the NCRP exposure criteria (See References [1] and [30]), upon which the FCC guidelines are based, recommend limits with respect to both occupational/controlled and general population/uncontrolled exposures. The compliance requirements for each category are based on a person's awareness and ability to exercise control over his or her exposure. Page 10 of 27 TÜV SÜD AMERICA INC 10040 Mesa Rim Road San Diego, CA 92121-2912 Phone: 858 678 1400 FAX: 858 546 0364

FCC ID K3YHNS9202 Report No. SC1102725F OCCUPATIONAL / CONTROLLED EXPOSURE In general, occupational/controlled exposure limits are applicable to situations in which persons are exposed as a consequence of their employment, who have been made fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over their exposure. This exposure category is also applicable when the exposure is of a transient nature due to incidental passage through a location where the exposure levels may be higher than the general population/uncontrolled limits, but the exposed person is fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over his or her exposure by leaving the area or by some other appropriate means. Awareness of the potential for RF exposure in a workplace or similar environment can be provided through specific training as part of a RF safety program. If appropriate, warning signs and labels can also be used to establish such awareness by providing prominent information on the risk of potential exposure and instructions on methods to minimize such exposure risks. GENERAL POPULATION / UNCONTROLLED EXPOSURE The general population/uncontrolled exposure limits are applicable to situations in which the general public may be exposed or in which persons who are exposed as a consequence of their employment may not be made fully aware of the potential for exposure or cannot exercise control over their exposure. Members of the general public would come under this category when exposure is not employment‐related; for example, in the case of a wireless transmitter that exposes persons in its vicinity. Warning labels placed on low‐power consumer devices such as cellular telephones are not considered sufficient to allow the device to be considered under the occupational/controlled category, and the general population/uncontrolled exposure limits apply to these devices. Page 11 of 27 TÜV SÜD AMERICA INC 10040 Mesa Rim Road San Diego, CA 92121-2912 Phone: 858 678 1400 FAX: 858 546 0364

FCC ID K3YHNS9202 Report No. SC1102725F 1.6 DEVIATIONS FROM THE STANDARD No deviations from the applicable test standards or test plan were made during testing. 1.7 MODIFICATION RECORD Date Modification Description of Modification Modification Fitted By Fitted Serial Number: 004401‐64‐001017‐5 N/A The table above details modifications made to the EUT during the test programme. The modifications incorporated during each test (if relevant) are recorded on the appropriate test pages. 1.8 TEST FACILITY 1.8.1 FCC – Registration No.: US5281 TUV SUD America Inc. (San Diego), a §2.498 listed test firm operates the EMC Laboratory registered under Sony Electronics Inc. Product Quality Division EMC. This laboratory has been registered and fully described in a report filed with the (FCC) Federal Communications Commission. The acceptance letter from the FCC is maintained in our files and the Registration is US5281. 1.8.2 Industry Canada (IC) Registration No.: 3067A The 10m Semi‐anechoic chamber of TUV SUD America Inc. (San Diego), has been registered by Certification and Engineering Bureau of Industry Canada for radio equipment testing with Registration No. 3067A. Page 12 of 27 TÜV SÜD AMERICA INC 10040 Mesa Rim Road San Diego, CA 92121-2912 Phone: 858 678 1400 FAX: 858 546 0364

FCC ID K3YHNS9202 Report No. SC1102725F SECTION 2 TEST DETAILS Maximum Permissible Exposure Evaluation for Hughes Network Systems Land Portable Terminal Page 13 of 27 TÜV SÜD AMERICA INC 10040 Mesa Rim Road San Diego, CA 92121-2912 Phone: 858 678 1400 FAX: 858 546 0364

FCC ID K3YHNS9202 Report No. SC1102725F 2.1 PREDICTION OF MPE AT A GIVEN DISTANCE 2.1.1 Specification Reference OET Bulletin 65 Edition 97‐01 including Supplement C 2.1.2 Limit Applicable Limits for General Population/Uncontrolled Exposure Electric Field Strength Electric Field Strength Power Density Averaging Time Frequency Range 2 2 (E) (H) (S) [E] ,[H] or S (MHz) 2 (V/m) (A/m) (mW/cm ) (minutes) 0.3‐1.34 614 1.63 (100)* 30 1.34‐30 824/f 2.19/f (180/f)* 30 30‐300 27.5 0.073 0.2 30 300‐1500 ‐ ‐ f/1500 30 1500‐100,000 ‐ ‐ 1.0 30 f = frequency in MHz *Plane‐wave equivalent power density NOTE : The averaging time for General Population/Uncontrolled exposure to fixed transmitters is not applicable for mobile and portable transmitters. See 47 CFR §§2.1091 and 2.1093 on source‐based time‐averaging requirements for mobile and portable transmitters. 2.1.3 Equipment Evaluated Serial No: 004401‐64‐001017‐5 2.1.4 Date of Evaluation July 14, 2011 2.1.5 Additional Observations  This is MPE evaluation of the WLAN card integrated with the EUT.  Variables used with the calculation are based from Report No: SC1102725B (Part 15.247 Test Report).  Prediction distance is 20 cm.  EUT is defined as a mobile device with exposure category of general population/uncontrolled exposure. Page 14 of 27 TÜV SÜD AMERICA INC 10040 Mesa Rim Road San Diego, CA 92121-2912 Phone: 858 678 1400 FAX: 858 546 0364

FCC ID K3YHNS9202 Report No. SC1102725F 2.1.6 Test Results Equation from page 18 of OET Bulletin 65, Edition 97‐01 4 where: S = Power Density P = Power Input To The Antenna G = Power Gain Of The Antenna In The Direction Of Interest Relative To Isotropic R = Distance To The Center Of Radiation Of The Antenna Maximum peak output power at antenna input terminal: 11.83 (dBm) Maximum peak output power at antenna input terminal: 15.24 (mW) Antenna gain(typical): 2.5 (dBi) Maximum antenna gain: 1.778 (numeric) Prediction distance: 20 (cm) Sourse Based Time Average Duty Cycle: 100 (%) Prediction frequency: 2412 (MHz) MPE limit for uncontrolled exposure at prediction frequency: 1.000 (mW/cm2) Power density at prediction frequency: 0.0054 (mW/cm2) Power density at prediction frequency: 0.054 (W/m2) Margin of Compliance: 22.6 (dB) Minimum Distance: 1.468 (cm) Page 15 of 27 TÜV SÜD AMERICA INC 10040 Mesa Rim Road San Diego, CA 92121-2912 Phone: 858 678 1400 FAX: 858 546 0364

FCC ID K3YHNS9202 Report No. SC1102725F 2.2 MPE EVALUATION USING FIELD PROBE 2.2.1 Specification Reference OET Bulletin 65 Edition 97‐01 including Supplement C 2.2.2 Limit Applicable Limits for General Population/Uncontrolled Exposure Electric Field Strength Electric Field Strength Power Density Averaging Time Frequency Range 2 2 (E) (H) (S) [E] ,[H] or S (MHz) 2 (V/m) (A/m) (mW/cm ) (minutes) 0.3‐1.34 614 1.63 (100)* 30 1.34‐30 824/f 2.19/f (180/f)* 30 30‐300 27.5 0.073 0.2 30 300‐1500 ‐ ‐ f/1500 30 1500‐100,000 ‐ ‐ 1.0 30 f = frequency in MHz *Plane‐wave equivalent power density NOTE : The averaging time for General Population/Uncontrolled exposure to fixed transmitters is not applicable for mobile and portable transmitters. See 47 CFR §§2.1091 and 2.1093 on source‐based time‐averaging requirements for mobile and portable transmitters. 2.2.3 Equipment Evaluated Serial No: 004401‐64‐001017‐5 2.2.4 Date of Evaluation July 18, 2011 2.2.5 Test Equipment Used The major items of test equipment used for the above tests are identified in Section 3.1. 2.2.6 Environmental Conditions Ambient Temperature 23C Relative Humidity 45% ATM Pressure 1008 mbar 2.2.7 Additional Observations  This is MPE evaluation of the L‐Band 12 dB Transportable Satellite antenna.  Only the worst case channel/modulation reported (High Channel R20T1X). Page 16 of 27 TÜV SÜD AMERICA INC 10040 Mesa Rim Road San Diego, CA 92121-2912 Phone: 858 678 1400 FAX: 858 546 0364

FCC ID K3YHNS9202 Report No. SC1102725F  Manufacturer recommended separation distance is 1 meter. The EUT was evaluated at 20cm except the front area of the antenna. evaluated @ 1 meter.  Position of the field probe was maximized until maximum reading was recorded.  EUT is defined as a mobile device with exposure category of general population/uncontrolled exposure. 2.2.8 Test Results See attached diagram and table. Distance Max. Reading Max. Reading Location Results (cm) (V/m) (mW/cm2) Front 20 134.2 4.78 See Note below Front 100 15.65 0.06497 Complies with 1 mW/cm2 limit Left Side 20 8.78 0.02045 Complies with 1 mW/cm2 limit Right Side 20 17.28 0.07920 Complies with 1 mW/cm2 limit Top 20 12.5 0.04145 Complies with 1 mW/cm2 limit Back 20 14.4 0.05500 Complies with 1 mW/cm2 limit Note: Minimum separation distance recommended by the manufacturer is 1 meter (page 47 of the user guide). Results @ 1 meter will be used for “front of antenna” evaluation. See statement under FCC Compliance of the user guide: “To comply with FCC RF exposure requirements, this device must be operated with a minimum separation distance of one meter or more from a person's body. Other operating configurations should be avoided.” Page 17 of 27 TÜV SÜD AMERICA INC 10040 Mesa Rim Road San Diego, CA 92121-2912 Phone: 858 678 1400 FAX: 858 546 0364

FCC ID K3YHNS9202 Report No. SC1102725F 2.3 WORST CASE CO‐LOCATED EXPOSURE CONDITIONS 2.3.1 Specification Reference OET Bulletin 65 Edition 97‐01 including Supplement C 2.3.2 Limit Applicable The FCC's MPE limits vary with frequency. Therefore, in mixed or broadband RF fields where several sources and frequencies are involved, the fraction of the recommended limit (in terms of power density or square of the electric or magnetic field strength) incurred within each frequency interval should be determined, and the sum of all fractional contributions should not exceed 1.0, or 100% in terms of percentage. 2.3.3 Equipment Evaluated Serial No: 004401‐64‐001017‐5 2.3.4 Date of Evaluation July 18, 2011 2.3.5 Test Results Complies. See attached table. Evaluation Worst Case MPE Limit MPE Ratio Transmitter Distance (mW/cm2) (mW/cm2) (MPE/MPE Limit) (cm) Part 15 (WLAN) 0.00540 20 1 0.0054 Part 25 (Satellite) 0.07920 20 1 0.0792* Sum of the ratios (should be <1.0) 0.0846 Note: For Part 25 MPE evaluation, worst case measurement was used. Page 18 of 27 TÜV SÜD AMERICA INC 10040 Mesa Rim Road San Diego, CA 92121-2912 Phone: 858 678 1400 FAX: 858 546 0364

FCC ID K3YHNS9202 Report No. SC1102725F SECTION 3 TEST EQUIPMENT USED Page 19 of 27 TÜV SÜD AMERICA INC 10040 Mesa Rim Road San Diego, CA 92121-2912 Phone: 858 678 1400 FAX: 858 546 0364

FCC ID K3YHNS9202 Report No. SC1102725F 3.1 TEST EQUIPMENT USED List of absolute measuring and other principal items of test equipment. ID Number Cal Due Test Equipment Type Serial Number Manufacturer Cal Date (SDGE/SDRB) Date 6507 Isotropic Field Monitor FM2000 14929 Amplifier Research No Calibration Required 6688 Isotropic Field Probe FP2080 24598 Amplifier Research 02/22/11 02/22/12 Page 20 of 27 TÜV SÜD AMERICA INC 10040 Mesa Rim Road San Diego, CA 92121-2912 Phone: 858 678 1400 FAX: 858 546 0364

FCC ID K3YHNS9202 Report No. SC1102725F SECTION 4 PHOTOGRAPHS Page 21 of 27 TÜV SÜD AMERICA INC 10040 Mesa Rim Road San Diego, CA 92121-2912 Phone: 858 678 1400 FAX: 858 546 0364

FCC ID K3YHNS9202 Report No. SC1102725F 4.1 MPE EVALUATION TEST SETUP USING FIELD PROBE General Test Setup MPE evaluation (Front) Page 22 of 27 TÜV SÜD AMERICA INC 10040 Mesa Rim Road San Diego, CA 92121-2912 Phone: 858 678 1400 FAX: 858 546 0364

FCC ID K3YHNS9202 Report No. SC1102725F MPE evaluation (Back) MPE evaluation (Left Side) Page 23 of 27 TÜV SÜD AMERICA INC 10040 Mesa Rim Road San Diego, CA 92121-2912 Phone: 858 678 1400 FAX: 858 546 0364

FCC ID K3YHNS9202 Report No. SC1102725F MPE evaluation (Right Side) MPE evaluation (Front at 1 meter) Page 24 of 27 TÜV SÜD AMERICA INC 10040 Mesa Rim Road San Diego, CA 92121-2912 Phone: 858 678 1400 FAX: 858 546 0364

FCC ID K3YHNS9202 Report No. SC1102725F SECTION 5 ACCREDITATION, DISCLAIMERS AND COPYRIGHT Page 25 of 27 TÜV SÜD AMERICA INC 10040 Mesa Rim Road San Diego, CA 92121-2912 Phone: 858 678 1400 FAX: 858 546 0364

FCC ID K3YHNS9202 Report No. SC1102725F 5.1 ACCREDITATION, DISCLAIMERS AND COPYRIGHT TÜV SÜD America Inc.’s reports apply only to the specific sample tested under stated test conditions. It is the manufacturer’s responsibility to assure the continued compliance of production units of this model. TÜV SÜD America, Inc. shall have no liability for any deductions, inferences or generalizations drawn by the client or others from TÜV SÜD America, Inc.’s issued reports. This report is the confidential property of the client. As a mutual protection to our clients, the public and TÜV SÜD America, Inc., extracts from the test report shall not be reproduced, except in full without TÜV SÜD America, Inc.’s written approval. The client shall not use this report to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. (TÜV SÜD America, Inc.’s (San Diego, California) NVLAP Lab Code: 100268‐0.) TÜV SÜD America, Inc. and its professional staff hold government and professional organization certifications for AAMI, ACIL, AEA, ANSI, IEEE, NVLAP, NIST and VCCI. Page 26 of 27 TÜV SÜD AMERICA INC 10040 Mesa Rim Road San Diego, CA 92121-2912 Phone: 858 678 1400 FAX: 858 546 0364


Document Created: 2011-12-28 14:14:39
Document Modified: 2011-12-28 14:14:39
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC