Attachment FCC Re - File SES-MO

FCC Re - File SES-MO

REPLY submitted by ABS-CBN

Reply

2010-09-15

This document pretains to SES-MOD-20091229-01632 for Modification on a Satellite Earth Station filing.

IBFS_SESMOD2009122901632_840477

San Francisco International Gateway
2301 Columbia Blvd.
Richmond, CA 94804-5407




                                               Federal Communications Commission
                                               445 12th Street, SW
                                               Washington, DC 20554


                                      Attention:   Kathyrn Medley
                                                   International Bureau
                                                   Satellite Division


September 15, 2010


Federal Communications Commission
445 12th Street, SW
Washington, DC 20554


Attention:      Kathyrn Medley
                International Bureau
                Satellite Division

Reference:      File No.:    SES-MOD-20091229-01632
                Call Sign: E000584
                Original Filing Date: 12/22/2009

Dear Kathyrn,

I am in receipt of your letter of September 14, 2010 (FCC Document DA 10-1736 – attached for
your reference). Thank you for informing me of my application deficiencies. I had mistakenly
believed that one of the satellites that we had anticipated using, GE-23 (formerly AMC-23), was
included in the ALSAT permitted list, along with that satellite’s full range of downlink
frequencies. I understand now that the ALSAT list and its usage in an application can only
pertain to the 11700 – 12200 MHz downlink frequency range and not to the extended Ku band
downlink range.

Secondly, I also mistakenly believed that the receive frequencies proposed for an earth station
did not require coordination. I have since been in communication with Paul Blais and Frank
Peace of the FCC Systems Analysis Branch, and they have suggested that I commission a
coordination contour report from one of the established frequency coordinators.

Finally, I realized that I had made a mistake in the lower frequency range necessary to
communicate with GE-23. Instead of 10700 MHz, I should have listed 10900 MHz as the lower
frequency on my application.

As a result, I will be re-submitting my application with the above three issues corrected, as was
suggested by footnote 1 of the Document DA 10-1736. However, can I assume that I should
be able to re-submit my application on-line without paying a new application fee? Or will the
FCC’s on-line system require me to go to the Fee Filer before I can complete my application
submission?

Respectfully Yours,



S. Edmund Johnson
Manager, Systems Engineering
ABS-CBN International
San Francisco International Gateway

650-508-6679
ejohnson@abs-cbni.com




       2301 Columbia Blvd., Richmond, CA 94804-5407 Tel: (510) 525-0126 Fax: (510) 525-6927 www.abs-cbni.com


                           Federal Communications Commission
                                     Washington, D.C. 20554


                                                                                            DA 10—1736



                                            September 14, 2010

S. Edmund Johnson
ABS—CBN International
2301 Columbia Blvd
Richmond, CA 94804—5407




                                                       Re: Call Sign E000584
                                                       File Number: SES—MOD—20091229—01632


Dear Mr. Johnson:

On December 29, 2009, ABS—CBN International (ABS—CBN) filed a modification application to
the above captioned earth station, requesting authority to operate in the 10.95—11.2 GHz and
11.47—11.7 GHz frequency bands, in addition to its currently licensed operations. Pursuant to
Section 25.112(a)(2) of the Commission‘s rules, 47 C.F.R § 25.112(a)(1), we dismiss the
application without prejudice to refiling.‘

Section 25.112 of the Commission‘s rules, 47 C.F.R. § 25.112, requires the Commission to
return, as unacceptable for filing, any earth station application that is not substantially complete,
contains internal inconsistencies, or does not substantially comply with the Commission‘s rules.
ABS—CBN‘s application does not comply with the Commission‘s rules, which renders it
unacceptable and subject to dismissal. The deficiencies are as follows:

In response to Item E43/44 of Schedule B, ABS—CBN lists the receive frequencies of 10.7—12.7
GHz. In Item E21, ABS—CBN lists ALSAT—designated satellites as the only point of
communication. Only those fixed—satellite service earth stations that are both two—degree
compliant and operate in the conventional Ku—band frequencies of 11.7—12.2 GHz or 14.0—14.5
GHz frequency bands can request ALSAT—designated satellites as point of communications.
Because ABS—CBN proposes operations in the 10.95—11.2 GHz, 11.47—11.7 GHz, and 12.2—12.7
GHz frequencies, it must identify the specific satellites or satellites with which the earth station
seeks to communicate using these bands."



‘   If ABS—CBN refiles an application in which the deficiencies identified in this letter have been
corrected, but is otherwise identical to the one dismissed, it need not pay an application fee. See 47 C.F.R.
§ 1.1111(d).

* Fixed—satellite service use of the frequency band 12.2—12.7 GHz is limited to non—geostationary satellite
systems. See 47 C.F.R §2.106 Footnote 5.487A.


                                  Federal Communications Commission                     DA 10—1736


Furthermore, the 10.7—11.7 GHz band is shared on a co—primary basis with the Fixed Service.
Section 25.203(c) of the Commission‘s rules, 47 C.F.R. § 25.203(c), requires earth station
applicants seeking authority to use this band to submit a Frequency Coordination Report with
respect to Fixed Service operations. In response to Question E18 of Schedule B, however, ABS—
CBN states that frequency coordination is not required, and did not submit a Coordination Report.
However, ABS—CBN does not explain the basis for this claim or request a waiver ofthis rule.
Thus the application is incomplete. In the event that ABS—CBN chooses to refile this application
seeking authority to operate a fixed earth stationin the 10.95—11.2 GHz, 11.47—11.7 GHz, and
12.2—12.7 GHz frequencies at the proposed location, it must either (a) include a Frequency
Coordination Report for the portions of the 10.7—11.7 GHz band in which it plans to operate, (b)
provide a more detailed explanation of its contention that a frequency coordination report is not
required, or (c) include a request for waiver of the coordination requirement in its application.

In lightof the above, pursuantto Section 25.112(a)(1) of the Commission‘s rules, 47 C.F.R. §
25.112(a)(1) and Section 0.261 of the Commission‘s rules on delegationsof authority, 47 C.F.R.
§ 0.261, we dismiss the application without prejudice to refiling.


                                             Sincerely,



                                             Aheh>es
                                              Kathyrn Medley
                                              Chief, Satellite Engineering Branch
                                              Satellite Division
                                              International Bureau



Document Created: 2010-09-15 12:28:47
Document Modified: 2010-09-15 12:28:47

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC