PAC 1_65 Letter 2016

LETTER submitted by Panasonic Avionics Corporation

Section 1.65 Letter

2016-01-12

This document pretains to SES-MFS-20150609-00349 for Modification w/ Foreign Satellite (earth station) on a Satellite Earth Station filing.

IBFS_SESMFS2015060900349_1122319

                                                                      LMI Advisors
                                                                      8601 James Creek Drive
                                                                      Springfield, VA 22152

                                                                      Carlos M. Nalda
                                                                      T: +1 571 332 5626
                                                                      cnalda@lmiadvisors.com




January 7, 2016

Marlene H. Dortch
Secretary
Federal Communications Commission
445 12th Street, SW
Washington, D.C. 20554

          Re:    Panasonic Avionics Corporation – Section 1.65 Submission,
                 Response to FCC Letter dated Nov. 12, 2015, Call Sign E100089,
                 File Nos. SES-MFS-20150609-00349 and SES-AFS-20150820-00538

Dear Ms. Dortch:

       Panasonic Avionics Corporation (“Panasonic”), in connection with the above-referenced
earth station aboard aircraft (“ESAA”) application and pursuant to Section 1.65 of the
Commission’s Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.65, hereby responds to a letter from the Commission dated
November 12, 2015.1

         In the letter, the Commission requested clarification of certain information in Panasonic’s
ESAA application, including: (i) the orbital range associated with the Eutelsat 70B coordination
letter; (ii) additional information regarding orbital debris mitigation for the Eutelsat 70B, Yamal
401 and NSS-6 satellites; (iii) given the relocation of Yamal 300K and resulting service to earth
stations located in the United States, information showing that operation of the satellite is
consistent with requirements for U.S.-licensed systems operating in the United States; and (iv)
the name of the relevant ITU satellite network filings and administrations for the Eutelsat 70B,
JCSAT-5A, Yamal 401, Yamal 300K and NSS-6 satellites.2 With the exception of item (iii),
which must be addressed in a formal application amendment, this submission provides the
requested clarifications and additional information.




1
 See Letter from Jose Albuquerque, Chief, Satellite Division, International Bureau to Carlos M.
Nalda, LMI Advisors, Call Sign E100089, File Nos. SES-MFS-20150609-00349 and SES-AFS-
20150820-00538 (Nov. 12, 2015).
2
    See generally id.


       Panasonic hereby confirms that the statement of Eutelsat regarding consistency of the
proposed operations with “existing satellite coordination agreements with the adjacent satellites
to Eutelsat 70B” includes adjacent satellites within +/-6 degrees of orbital separation from the
Eutelsat 70B satellite in accordance with Section 25.227(b)(2)(ii) of the Commission’s rules.

        Panasonic also provides the following clarifications and additional information regarding
the orbital debris mitigation plans for the Eutelsat 70B, Yamal 401 and NSS-6 satellites:

      Eutelsat 70B: In the Eutelsat 70B Space Debris Mitigation Plan, Section 4.A contains a
       table which shows predicted masses of materials at end-of-life. The table summarises the
       amount of propellant and/or pressurant that cannot be expelled/used (the so-called
       “residuals”). As explained in the Mitigation Plan, once the orbit raise activity is
       completed, Eutelsat continues its efforts to empty fuel and oxidizer tanks as much as
       possible. As part of this exercise, some of the predicted residuals will be expelled so
       final mass of residuals should be smaller than those appearing in the table. However,
       Eutelsat cannot guaranty or quantify with specificity the amount that may be expelled
       during this process. For this reason, the predicted values in the table should be viewed as
       worst-case values for purposes of the Commission’s orbital debris mitigation assessment.

      Yamal 401: The Commission requested that Panasonic confirm or correct the figures in
       the table in the appendix of the Yamal 401 Orbital Debris Mitigation Plan. Panasonic has
       communicated with the satellite operator and provides the following updated table (new
       information is reflected in bold/underlined text).


         Item       Purpose       Tank        Number of Tanks /     Initial   End of life     Tank       End-of-
                                 Volume        Interconnected     mass of       mass/       pressure       life
                                                                  item per     volume        rating /   pressure
                                                                     tank                     units
       Hydrazine   Attitude     26 liters     3 Tanks /           25 kg       0.7 kg/       8.1 atm     NA
       (liquid)    control      BOL           Interconnected                  0.7 l
                                0.7 litre
                                EOL           Fuel and
       Nitrogen    Pressurant   14 liters     pressurant are      0.25 kg     0.25 kg/      8.1 atm     2.9 atm
                                BOL           located in                      39,3 l
                                39.3 liters   common tank and
                                EOL           separated by
                                              internal
                                              membrane.
       Xenon       Orbit        38 liters     4 / Yes             71 kg in    1 kg          140 atm     2.6 atm
                   control                                        each        in each
                                                                  tank        tank



       In addition, the Commission requested confirmation of the temperature(s) at which end-
       of-life pressures were calculated. The satellite operator informed Panasonic that the
       temperature for calculation of the updated end-of-life pressure (i.e., Nitrogen) is 291°K.




                                                                                                                   2


         NSS-6: The Commission requested that Panasonic provide the type and mass of any
          residual pressurant in the NSS-6 satellite’s oxidizer tanks, and the type of oxidizer in
          them. The pressurant in the tanks is Helium with a mass of 1.398 kg. The type of
          oxidizer is MON-3 (N2O4 with 3% NO2).

      Panasonic further provides the chart below to summarize the relevant ITU satellite
network filings and administrations requested by the Commission:


           Satellite               ITU satellite network             Administration name
           E70B                    EUTELSAT 3-70.5E                  France
           JCSAT-5A                N-STAR-A                          Japan
           Yamal-300K              NSS-19                            Netherlands
           Yamal-401               EXPRESS-7C                        Russia
           NSS 6                   NSS-9                             Netherlands

         Finally, with respect to the information showing that operation of the Yamal 300K
satellite is consistent with requirements for U.S.-licensed systems operating in the United States,
Panasonic has filed a separate application amendment to formally submit this information
(including Schedule S data) in the docket of its ESAA application.3

      Please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned with any questions regarding this
submission. Thank you very much for your continued consideration.



                                                        Respectfully submitted,


                                                        Carlos M. Nalda
                                                        LMI Advisors

cc:       Jose Albuquerque, FCC
          Paul Blais, FCC




3
    See IBFS Submission ID IB2016000036 (Jan. 7, 2016).




                                                                                                     3



Document Created: 2016-01-12 20:57:47
Document Modified: 2016-01-12 20:57:47

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC