Attachment Dissmissal In Part

This document pretains to SES-MFS-20050701-00853 for Modification w/ Foreign Satellite (earth station) on a Satellite Earth Station filing.

IBFS_SESMFS2005070100853_456400

Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 DA 05—2486 September 21, 2008 Carlos M. Natda Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferri, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. 701 Pennsyivania Avenue, NW Suie 900 Washington, DC 20004 Re: Call Sign: BO0O723 File No. SES—MFS—20050701—00853 Dear Mr. Nalda: On July 1, 2005, The Boeing Company (Bosing) filed the above—captioned application to modify its existing conventional Ku—Band‘license to add. among other things,the SN—4 (Spacenct 4) satelle at 172"EL., AMC:23 satelite at 172" EL, INTELSAT 605 satellte at 174° E.. NSS—5 satellt at 177° W.L, and AMC—6 sateliteat72" W.L., s new Points of Communication using the conventional Ku—Band and extended Ku—Bands.® Pursuantto Section 25.1 12(a)(1) ofthe Commission‘s rules, 47 CRR. § 25.1L2(a)(1, we dismiss this application in partas defective because of inconsistencies in frequency bands for certain Points of Communication: Your application requestsauthority forthis earthsttion to receive transmissions in the 12.2— 12.75 GH band from NSS—5. NSS—5, however, is not capable of transmitting in the 12.2—12.5 GHz band. Similarly,you request authority o receive trnsmissions from SN—4 in the 11.45—11.7 and 12.2—12.75 GHe bands. SN—t does not havthe capabilty or authorty to transmit in these bands, ‘Thus, we dismissthat portion of your application that seeks authority to operate with the NSS—5 and SN—t since we cannot determinethe frequencies on which you intend to operate While we dismiss the application in prt on the above basis, we take the opportunity to apprise you afother concerms we have should Bocing chooseto refilthe application. Since your application did notinclude information similar t that required by Schedule S we have insufficient technical information before us on which to make a determination as to whether NSS—5‘s 12.5—12.75 GHe band operations are compatible with those ofother satelites Therefore, if you choose to refile your application withregard to NSS—S in the 12.5—12.75 GHtz !117—122a0140145 Gite. * ao95—112, Ias— 127 ind 122—1275 o 3 See 47 CBR56 25.1 M@, 25.1370)

mtc imnssio a o5 ziss band, we request you provide information required by Schedule S. Alternatively, you may provideinformation similar to what Bocing filed in itsprevious modifcation application (File No. SBS—MOD—20040301—00304)to demonstrae compatibility with adjacent satelte operations. Accordingly, pursuant to Section 25.112(a)(1)of the Commission‘s rles, 47 CIFR. § 25.1 12(a¥(D, and Section 0.261 of the Commission‘s ules on delegations of authority,47 CER. § 0.261, we dismiss your applicationin partto the extent stated above without prejudice to refiling.* We will continue o process the remaining portions of your application. Sincerely, AuO A. betec Scot A. Kotler Chief, Systems Analysis Branch Sarelite Division Interational Bureau * See Letersfrom Phlip L. Maletand Carlos M. Nalda, Counselfothe Bocing Company,to Marlenc . Drich, Officeaf thSecretay, Rederal Communications Commission (September , 2004 , Sepember 9, 2004and April 26, 2008) "47 CRR. Section 28.112(@)(). Seealso Echostar Stelite LLC, Order on Reconsideration, DA 04— 4056 (released December 27, 2004) * If Boringrefles an applcationidentcal to the one disnissed, with the exception of supplying the missing and correted information it need not pay an aplicaion fee. See 47 CER. Section 1.1109(0)


Document Created: 2005-09-21 12:33:13
Document Modified: 2005-09-21 12:33:13
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC