Reply of O3b Limited

REPLY submitted by O3b Limited

Reply of O3b Limited

2017-06-27

This document pretains to SES-LIC-20170401-00357 for License on a Satellite Earth Station filing.

IBFS_SESLIC2017040100357_1242438

                                          Before the
                               Federal Communications Commission
                                     Washington, D.C. 20554


    In the Matter of                                  )
                                                      )
    ViaSat Inc. Application for Authority to          )     IBFS File No. SES-LIC-20170401-00357
    Deploy Fixed Earth Stations                       )     Call Sign E170088


                                     REPLY OF O3B LIMITED

          O3b Limited (“O3b”) submits this reply regarding the above-captioned application in

which ViaSat, Inc. (“ViaSat”) seeks authority to deploy four million 0.75 meter and 10,000

1.8 meter fixed earth stations that will communicate in the Ka-band with geostationary orbit

(“GSO”) satellites.1

          In its Petition to Defer the ViaSat Application, 2 O3b argued that prior to acting on

ViaSat’s filing the Commission should require additional information regarding how ViaSat will

ensure that its earth stations will adequately protect non-geostationary orbit (“NGSO”) systems

in the 28.6-29.1 GHz and 18.8-19.3 GHz frequencies where they have primary status (together,

the “NGSO Primary Bands”). In particular, O3b pointed out that the ViaSat Application relies

on outdated analyses of its GSO satellites’ ability to share with NGSO systems and does not

explain how each of its proposed millions of earth stations would know when to cease

transmissions in the NGSO Primary Bands in order to protect NGSO systems and how ViaSat




1
 ViaSat, Inc., Call Sign E170088, File No. SES-LIC-20170401-00357 (the “ViaSat
Application”).
2
  Petition to Defer of O3b Limited, Call Sign E170088, File No. SES-LIC-20170401-00357,
filed June 2, 2017 (the “O3b Petition”).


would ensure that such muting was implemented. 3 The ViaSat Response4 provides no additional

information on these critical points.

          Instead, ViaSat again refers back to NGSO sharing showings it made when it applied for

its ViaSat-1 and ViaSat-2 satellites – showings that expressly took into account only a limited

number of types of NGSO systems. 5 ViaSat explains that it will use the same technique it

previously described to protect NGSO operations, terminating the satellite’s transmissions in the

NGSO Primary Bands for the duration of any in-line event with an NGSO satellite. 6 While O3b

agrees that the in-line avoidance approach can be effective to facilitate sharing, the

implementation details are important and are absent from the ViaSat materials.

          Most significantly, ViaSat focuses solely on the design capabilities of its satellites.

ViaSat does not reveal what capabilities of its proposed earth station terminals will allow the

terminals to calculate the parameters and duration of an in-line event and mute transmissions in

the NGSO Primary Bands for the duration of that event. ViaSat’s technical exhibit concludes

with a statement indicating that ViaSat will protect NGSO operations in the uplink portion of the

NGSO Primary Bands by “inhibiting uplink transmissions from earth stations during in-line

events,” referring back to the discussion in the foregoing pleading. In fact, however, there is no

such discussion that explains how, in practice, ViaSat will ensure that its proposed earth stations

do not transmit in this spectrum during in-line events.




3
    O3b Petition at 2-4.
4
 Opposition and Response of ViaSat, Inc. Call Sign E170088, File No. SES-LIC-20170401-
00357, filed June 15, 2017 (the “ViaSat Response”).
5
    See id. at 2-3.
6
    Id.

                                                    2


       Because ViaSat has not demonstrated that it can operate on an unprotected, non-

interference basis in the NGSO Primary Bands, the Commission should defer action on the

ViaSat Application pending submission of additional information on this critical issue.

                                                    Respectfully submitted,

                                                    O3b LIMITED

                                                    By: /s/ Suzanne Malloy
                                                    Suzanne Malloy
                                                    Vice President, Regulatory Affairs
                                                    O3b Limited
                                                    900 17th Street, NW
                                                    Suite 300
                                                    Washington, DC 20006
                                                    (202) 813-4026

  June 27, 2017




                                                3


                                 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
       I hereby certify that on this 27th day of June, 2017, I caused a true and correct copy of

the foregoing “Reply of O3b Limited” to be sent by first class mail, postage prepaid, to the

following:

Daryl T Hunter, P.E.
ViaSat, Inc.
Director, Regulatory Affairs
6155 El Camino Real
Carlsbad, CA 92009
daryl.hunter@viasat.com

                                                   /s/ Alicia Tambe
                                                   Alicia Tambe



Document Created: 2017-06-27 14:48:39
Document Modified: 2017-06-27 14:48:39

© 2025 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC