Attachment World Religious Reli

World Religious Reli

DECISION submitted by IB,FCC

DA 14-313

2014-03-06

This document pretains to SES-LIC-20131022-00898 for License on a Satellite Earth Station filing.

IBFS_SESLIC2013102200898_1038888

                                Federal Communications Commission
                                          Washington, D.C. 20554


                                                   March 6, 2014



                                                                                                          DA 14—313

Mr. William D. Silva
Law Offices ofWilliam D. Silva
P.O. Box 1121
Stevensville, MD 21666

                                                       File No.: SES—LIC—20131022—00898
                                                       Call Sign: E130216

Dear Mr. Silva:

      _On October 22, 2013, World Religious Relief, Inc. d/b/a The Word Network (The Word
Network) filed the above—captioned application for a new license of a Temporary—Fixed Satellite
Transmit—Only earth station that will transmit in the 14.0—14.5 GHz frequency band and receive in the
10.95—12.75 GHz frequency band with ALSAT—designated satellites. For the reasons indicated below, we
dismiss the application as defective, without prejudice to re—filing.‘

         Section 25.112 of the Commission‘s rules, 47 C.F.R. § 25.112, requires the Commission to
return, as unacceptable for filing, any earth station application that is not substantially complete, that
contains internal inconsistencies, or that does not substantially comply with the Commission‘s rules. For
the reasons stated below, The Word Network‘s application is inconsistent, incomplete, and otherwise does
not substantially comply with the Commission‘s rules.

    e    The Word Network did not submit a radiation hazard study, as required by the text included in
         item 28 of Form 312 and Section 1.1307(b) of the Commission‘s rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1307(b).

    e    The Word Network‘s application proposed operations in 10.95—12.75 GHz frequencies and listed
         ALSAT—designated satellites as the point of communication. In these frequency bands, the
         application must identify the specific satellite or satellites with which the proposed earth station
         seeks to communicate." Only those fixed—satellite service earth stations that are both two—degree
         compliant and operate in the 3700—4200 MHz, 5925—6425 MHz, 11.7 —12.2 GHz, or 14.0—14.5
         GHz bands can request ALSAT as a point of communication.




\ If The Word Network re—files an application in which the deficiencies identified in this letter have been
corrected, but is otherwise identical to the one dismissed, it need not pay an application fee. See 47 C.F.R.
§ 1.1111(d).                                                                                       |

2   Amendment ofthe Commission‘s Regulatory Policies to Allow Non—U.S.—Licensed Space Stations to Provide
Domestic and International Services in the United States, First Order on Reconsideration, IB Docket No. 96—111, 15
FCC Red 7207, 7214—16 (paras. 16—20).


                                   Federal Communications Commission                          DA 14—313




        While not grounds for dismissal, we note the following errors in The Word Network‘s application
that need to be corrected if the application is re—filed:

     e In Item 40, Total EIRP for all Carriers, The Word Network calculated the level as 73.67 dBW;
       however, our calculations show the correct level to be 73.97 dBW (10 log (300W) +49.2 dBi =
        73.97 dBW).

     e In Item 43/44, Frequency bands, and in Item E52/53, Frequency Limits, The Word Network
       applied to receive transmissions in the 10.95—12.75 GHz frequency band, while in response to
       Question 26, Type of Earth Station, The Word Network listed the station as a Transmit—Only
       station.

     e In Item E47, Emission Designator, The Word Network listed the carrier as "IMOOG7W", which
        appears to contain a typographical error in the acceptable bandwidth format required by Section
        2.202(b)(1) of the Commission‘s rules, 47 C.F.R. § 2.202(b)(1). Specifically, 47 C.F.R. §
        2.202(b)(1) states that "[t]he necessary bandwidth shall be expressed by three numerals and one
        letter." Therefore, the proposed carrier should be correctly stated as 9MOOG7W.

        Accordingly, pursuant to Section 25.112(a)(1) of the Commission‘s rules, 47 C.F.R.
§ 25.112(a)(1), and Section 0.261 of the Commission‘s rules on delegations of authority, 47 C.F.R. §
0.261, we dismiss The Word Network ‘s application without prejudice to re—filing.

                                                    Sincerely,             >


                                                     ,/"' fre" f2apy*
                                                          2 / ////&4
                                                      /
                                                  jPaul E. Blais
                                                    Chief, Systems Analysis Branch
                                                    Satellite Division
                                                    International Bureau



Document Created: 2014-03-06 16:05:43
Document Modified: 2014-03-06 16:05:43

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC