Attachment DA-12-877A11.pdf

DA-12-877A11.pdf

DESIGNATION ISSUES submitted by IB/FCC

Dismissal Letter

2012-06-04

This document pretains to SES-LIC-20120320-00283 for License on a Satellite Earth Station filing.

IBFS_SESLIC2012032000283_953895

                             Federal Communications Commission
                                   Washington, D.C. 20554


                                                                                                 DA 12-877

                                               June 4, 2012

Mr. Michael J. Beeler
Comtech EF Data Corp.
20430 Century Blvd
Germantown, MD 20874

                                                      Call Sign: E120058
                                                      File No.: SES-LIC-20120320-00283

Dear Mr. Beeler:

On March 20 2012, Comtech EF Data Corp. (Comtech) filed the above-captioned application for
a license to operate new 1.0, 1.2, 1.8, and 2.4-meter transmit/receive earth stations in the
conventional Ku-band.1 For the reason explained below, we dismiss that portion of the
application that proposes to operate a 1.0-meter General Dynamics antenna without prejudice to
re-filing.2

Section 25.112(a) of the Commission’s rules requires the Commission to return, as unacceptable
for filing, any earth station application that is not substantially complete, contains internal
inconsistencies, or does not substantially comply with the Commission’s rules.3 Comtech’s
application does not comply with the Commission’s rules, which renders it unacceptable and
subject to dismissal. The deficiency is as follows:

In response to Question E21 in Schedule B of FCC Form 312, Comtech lists “ALSAT” as the
proposed points of communication. Earth station applicants may designate ALSAT as a point of
communication only in cases where the earth station is eligible for routine processing.4 An earth
station proposing to operate in the conventional Ku-band must comply with Section 25.212(c) or,



1
  The conventional Ku-band encompasses the 11.7-12.2 GHz downlink and 14.0-14.5 GHz uplink
frequencies.
2
  If Comtech refiles an application identical to the portion dismissed, with the exception of supplying the
corrected information, it need not pay an application fee. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1111(d).
3
    47 C.F.R. § 25.112(a).
4
  See Amendment of the Commission’s Regulatory Policies to Allow Non-U.S. Licensed Space Stations to
Provide Domestic and International Services in the United States, IB Docket No. 96-111, First Order on
Reconsideration, 15 FCC Rcd 7207 (1999), at 7213 ¶13 (stating that licenses for “routine” earth stations
providing fixed-satellite service in the conventional C-band Ku-band may specify “ALSAT” as authorized
points of communication, and noting that a “routine” earth station is one that operates consistently with the
technical requirements of Part 25).


                                    Federal Communications Commission                       DA 12-877


in the alternative, with Section 25.218 to be processed routinely.5 Applicants proposing an earth
station that does not qualify for routine processing must identify specific satellites as proposed
points of communication.

Comtech’s proposed 1.0 meter antenna does not qualify for routine processing under Section
25.212(c). Thus, Comtech must demonstrate that the antenna, which will carry digital signals in
the conventional Ku-band, complies with the off-axis effective isotropically radiated power
(EIRP) limits in Section 25.218(f) to be eligible for routine processing. To make this
demonstration, an applicant must submit the off-axis EIRP tables described in Section 25.115(h).
Comtech’s application did not contain these tables. Consequently, we cannot find that Comtech’s
proposed 1.0-meter antenna is eligible for routine processing pursuant to Section 25.218.
Comtech cannot therefore propose “ALSAT” as a point of communication for this antenna.

In light of the above, pursuant to Section 0.261 of the Commission’s rules on delegated authority,
47 C.F.R. § 0.261, we dismiss that portion of the application that requests authority to operate a
1.0-meter General Dynamics antenna without prejudice to re-filing. Please note that if Comtech
wishes to re-file an application for this antenna without a demonstration that the antenna qualifies
for routine processing under Section 25.118(f), it must include certifications from potentially
affected adjacent satellite operators pursuant to Section 25.220(d) in its application.

                                                    Sincerely,




                                                    Paul E. Blais
                                                    Chief, Systems Analysis Branch
                                                    Satellite Division
                                                    International Bureau




5
  47 C.F.R. §§ 25.212(c) and 25.218. See 2000 Biennial Regulatory Review – Streamlining and Other
Revisions of Part 25 of the Commission’s Rules Governing the Licensing Of, and Spectrum Usage By,
Satellite Network Earth Stations and Space Stations, IB Docket No. 95-117, Eighth Report and Order On
Reconsideration, 23 FCC Rcd 15099 (2008), at 15100 ¶¶ 2-3 and 15144 ¶ 108 (extending routine licensing
to small antennas that meet specified off-axis effective isotropically radiated power (EIRP) envelopes).


                                                   2



Document Created: 2012-06-05 15:26:10
Document Modified: 2012-06-05 15:26:10

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC