Attachment Overon - DA 11 1162

Overon - DA 11 1162

DECISION submitted by IB,FCC

Dismissal

2011-07-01

This document pretains to SES-LIC-20110408-00426 for License on a Satellite Earth Station filing.

IBFS_SESLIC2011040800426_901680

f;éé-
          lC\
                                     Federal Communications
                                                 .
                                                            Commission
(%,
.              ofig}                           Washington, D.C. 20554
%%;kifl""t@i‘,?};j
                                                                                                       DA 11—1162
                                                        July 1, 2011
      Mr. Ihosvany de la Noval
      Overon America
      7291 NW 74th Street
      Miami, FL, 33166
                      Re: Overon America Application for Authority to Operate a 4.8 Meter C—band Earth
                      Station via the Amazonas—2 Satellite at 61.0° W.L., IBFS File No.
                      SES—LIC—20110408—00426 (Call Sign E110061).
   Dear Mr. Noval:

   On April 08, 2011, Overon America (Overon) filed the above—captioned application seeking
   authority to operate a 4.8 meter C—band earth station via the Brazilian Amazonas—2 geostationary
   satellite positioned at 61.0° W.L. using the 6728—6782 MHz frequency band, which is allocated for
   fixed—satellite service use in accordance with the provisions of Appendix 30B of the International
   Telecommunications Union (ITU) Radio Regulations‘. For the reasons discussed below, we
   dismiss the application as defective, without prejudice to re—filing‘.
   Section 25.112 of the Commission‘s rules, 47 C.F.R. § 25.112, requires the Commission to return as
   unacceptable for filing any earth station applicationthat is not substantially complete, contains
   internal inconsistencies, or does not substantially comply with the Commuission‘s rules. Overon‘s
   application has the following deficiencies, which renders the application unacceptable and subject
   to dismissal:
                1.       Applicants requesting operating authority for space stations in the Fixed—Satellite
                         Service (FSS) must provide an interference analysis pursuant to Section
                         25.140(b)(2) of the Commission‘s rules, 47 C.F.R. § 25.140(b)(2). The
                         interference analysis must demonstrate that the proposed FSS satellite system will
                         be compatible with a two—degree orbital spacing environment. On December3,
                         2003, the International Bureaureleased a Public Notice clarifying the types of
                         showings that must be provided and stating that applications filed after December
                         3, 2003 that do not contain this analysis will be dismissed as incomplete."
                         Overon‘s application does not contain the required analysis.




   ‘ International Telecommunications Union Radio Regulations, Appendix 30B.
   > If Overonrefiles an application identical to the one dismissed, with the exception of supplying the corrected
   information, it need not pay an application fee. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1111(d).


   * See Clarification of 47 C.F.R. § 25.140(b)(2), Space Station Application Interference Analysis, Public Notice, No.
   SPB—195, DA 03—3863 (rel. Dec. 3, 2003).


                                   Federal Communications Commission                     DA 11—1162


         2s         Overon states that the Amazonas—2 has been authorized pursuant to the provisions
                    of Appendix 30B." However, Overon did not provide the ITU name as required in
                    item E22 of Schedule B.

         3.         Although Overon provided the proposed emission designator in item E47 of
                    Schedule B as "54M0G7W," Overon did not provide information related to this
                    proposed emission designatorin items S11(b) and S$13(c) of Schedule S.

While the following items are not grounds for dismissal, we request that Overon correct or provide
additional information about the following items in any re—filed application:

         1.         There appears to be a typographical error in response to item S13(g) of Schedule
                    S, which lists Amazonas—3. Additionally, in response to item S8(f) of Schedule
                    S, please specify the "sat_name" for all of the GXT files.

         2.         Please provide an electromagnetic compatibility analysis consistent with Footnote
                    US245 in Section 2.106 of the Commuission‘s rules, 47 C.F.R. § 2.106 and
                    Section 2.108 of the Commussion‘s rules, 47 C.F.R. § 2.108.

Accordingly, pursuant to Section 25.112(a)(1) of the Commussion‘s rules, 47 C.F.R. § 25.112(a)(1),
and Section 0.261 of the Commission‘s rules on delegations of authority, 47 C.F.R. § 0.261, we
dismiss the application as defective without prejudice to re—filing.




                                                                       .q      f

                                                          //M5. h)
                                                                 Paul E. Blais
                                                               Chief, Systems Analysis Branch
                                                               Satellite Division
                                                               International Bureau



co:     Catherine Wang
        Bingham McCutchen LLP
        2020 K Street, NW
        Washington, D.C. 20006




* IBFS File No. SES—LIC—20110408—00426, Ex. A, at 1.



Document Created: 2019-04-14 18:51:04
Document Modified: 2019-04-14 18:51:04

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC