Attachment Request

This document pretains to SES-LIC-20080508-00570 for License on a Satellite Earth Station filing.

IBFS_SESLIC2008050800570_658190

                          Federal Communications Commission
                                    Washington, D.C. 20554



                                             August 7, 2008


David S. Keir
Leventhal Senter & Lerman PLLC
2000 K Street, N.W.
Suite 600
Washington, D.C. 20006

                                                        Re: Call Sign EO80100
                                                            File Nos. SES—LIC—20080508—00570
                                                                      SES—AMD—20080619—00826
                                                                      SES—STA—20080711—00928

Dear Mr. Keir:

On May 8, 2008, Row 44, Inc. (Row 44) filed the above—captioned application for a blanket
license to operate Aeronautical—Mobile Satellite Service (AMSS) transmit/receive earth stations
aboard commercial and private aircrafts.‘ The application was amended on June 19, 2008 to
provide supplementary information regarding certifications from satellite operators. The
proposed earth stations will operate in the conventional Ku—Band" and access the Horizons 1
satellite at 127° W.L, AMC—9 satellite at 83° W.L., and AMC—1 satellite at 101° W.L. On June
27, 2008, ViaSat, Inc. (ViaSat) filed a petition to deny the above—captioned application. On July
11, 2008, Row 44 filed a request for Special Temporary Authority (STA). On July 23, 2008,
Row 44 filed an opposition to ViaSat‘s petition to deny. Pursuant to Section 25.111(a) of the
Commission‘s rules, 47 C.F.R. § 25.111(a), we request that Row 44 provide, by amendment,
additional information to allow the Commission to continue to process the application.

Row 44 indicatesin its opposition Technical Annex paragraph 1 that its total input powerat the
antenna flange is never to exceed +12 dBW. Based on the proposed carrier bandwidth of 1.6
MHz, Row 44 asserted that it does not exceed a power density at the input of the antenna flange
of —14 dBW/4 kHz. In order to evaluate the application, please provide the Commission with the
maximum EIRP (dBW) in any 4 kHz band and the maximum power (dBW) at the input of the
antenna flange in any 4 kHz band for any method of modulation or data rate that the proposed
system will use.

In Section 4.2.1 of the System Description Exhibit to its application, Row 44 indicates that its
system has a pointing error of less than 0.2 degree rms. In order to evaluate the application,



‘   Row 44 requests a blanket authority to operate up to 1,000 technically—identical units.

‘   Transmit in the 14.05—14.47 GHz and receive in the 11.7—12.2 GHz bands.

3   STA requests for a 60—day pefiod to conduct limited mobility testing of up to 12 aircraft earth station
antennas to transmit in the 14.05—14.47 GHz and receive in the 11.7—12.2 GHz bands.


                                 Federal Communications Commission



please provide the Commission the peak mispointing error of the antenna between the orbital
location of the target satellite and the axis of the main lobe of the antenna.

Further, Row 44 indicates that it proposes to use a gimbaled motor control to orient the antenna in
azimuth, elevation, and polarization. In order to evaluate the application, please provide the
Commission technical characteristics that specifies how frequently orientation is assessed and
how quickly proper orientationis achieved upon detection that the antenna is not properly
oriented. In addition, please provide the Commission graphs that specify the maximum EIRP
density (dBW/4kHz) along the geostationary orbit with zero degrees assumed to be the target
satellite when the antenna is maximally misoriented in azimuth, elevation, and polarization (that
is most interfering) under two potential situations (1) the antenna has zero mispointing with the
target satellite and (2) the antenna is maximally mispointed fromthe target satellite before the
antenna receives a cessation of emission command.

In light of the above, we request that Row 44 respond to this letter within 30 calendar days of the
date of this letter. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of the application in its entirety
pursuant to Section 25.112(c) of the Commission‘s rules, 47 C.F.R. § 25.112(c).


                                                  Sincerely,




                                                  Scott A. Kotler
                                                  Chief, Systems Analysis Branch
                                                  Satellite Division
                                                  International Bureau

ce: John P. Janka
    Latham & Watkins LLP
    555 Eleventh Street, NW.
    Suite 1000
    Washington, DC 20004



Document Created: 2008-08-07 13:26:09
Document Modified: 2008-08-07 13:26:09

© 2025 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC