Attachment Dismissal letter

This document pretains to SES-LIC-20060217-00268 for License on a Satellite Earth Station filing.

IBFS_SESLIC2006021700268_492037

f      \1                Federal Communications Commission
@                                Washington, D.C. 20554
&       4


                                                                                       pa 06—760
                                        March 31, 2006

J. Dominic Monahan
Luvaas Cobb
777 High Street, Suite 300
Eugene, OR 97401
                                                 Re:Call Sign E60047
                                                    File No. SES—LIC—20060217—00268

                                                     Call Sign EO60O46
                                                     File No. SES—LIC—20060217—00267


Dear Mr. Monahan:

On February 17, 2006, Carol L. Ives filed the above—captioned applications for authority
to operate Ku—Band‘ earth stations in Titusille and White Springs, Florida. For the
reasons discussed below, we dismiss both applications as defective, without prejudice to
refiling"
A review of the applications reveals thatthe application does not include the antenna
transmits Antenna Gain (Item E42 of Schedule B of Form 312). In addition, neither
application includes the required radiation hazard analysis in response to question 28 of
the 312 Main Form. As a result, both applications are defective and will be dismissed.
While we dismiss both applications on the above basis, we take the opportunity to apprise
you of another concern we have with the applications.
In response to Items ES4 and ESS of Schedule B, Carol L. Ives indicates that the eastem
satellte are limit is 60° E.L. Sincethe earth stations in Plorida are not within line ofsight
of a satellite that far east, this cannot be correct. Please correct this in any refiling.




    1174122 and 14.0—145 GH bands:
* 1 Carol L. ves r—fils an applicationidentical tothe one dismissed, with the exception of
supplsing the missing information, it need not pay an application fec. See 47 C.FR. § 1.1109(0).


                               Federal Communt                mmission        pal

Accordingly, pursuantto Section 25. 12(a)(1) of the Commission‘s rules, 47 C.F.R. §
25.112(a) (1), and Section 0.261 ofthe Commission‘s rules on delegations of authority,
47 C.FR. § 0.261, we dismiss both applications as defective without prejudice to refling


                                                 Sincerely,

                                        *4 ekh
                                                 Scott A. Kotler (24.)
                                                Chief, Systems Analysis Branch
                                                Satellite Division
                                                Interational Bureau



Document Created: 2006-03-31 12:16:23
Document Modified: 2006-03-31 12:16:23

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC