Attachment E050151/DIS

This document pretains to SES-LIC-20050525-00656 for License on a Satellite Earth Station filing.

IBFS_SESLIC2005052500656_449128

Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 International Buresu pa os—2265 August 10, 2005 Joseph E. Dunne III Scientific Games Racing, LL.C. 651 Sawmill Road, Rafter J Suite A Durango, CO 81303 Re:Call Sign EOSO151 File No. SES—LIC—20050525—00656 Call Sign E050152 File No. SES—LIC—20050525—00657 Dear Mr. Dunne I: On May 25, 2005, Scientific Games Racing, L L.C. (Scientific Games) filed the above— captioned applications for authority to operate Temporary—Fixed C—Band" Transmit/Receive Earth Stations. For the reasons discussed below, we dismiss both applications as defective, without prejudice to refiing." A review of the applications reveals that you did not provide the point of communication as required in form 312, Schedule B for cither application.. In addition, you did not submit a complete radiation hazard analysis as required by Commission Rules for either application. As a result, both your appliations are defective and will be dismissed. While we dismiss the application on the above basis, we take the opportunity to apprise you of other concems we have should Scientific Games choose to re—file the application. Our study reveals that based on the Maximum EIRP Density (Question E49) and Antenna Transmit Gain (E41/42), your Maximum Input Power Density exceeds Section 25.212(d) 1. 5025.6425 Miz band * 1fScienific Games Racing, L L C. rfiles n applcationidentieal o the one dismissed, wth the exception of supplyingthemissing infrmationit need not pay an application f. See 47 CER.$ L110(

Federal Communications Commission paos—2265 of the Commission‘s rules" by2.2 dB for the 36MOG7W (in both applications) and 4MSOG7W (n the application regarding Call Sign EO50151) emissions.. We also note that your applications propose to use 4.1 meter antennas. These antennas are considered "non—routine" underCommission Rules. Therefore, in refiling your applications, you must identify specific satelites as Points of Communication and include certifications from adjacent operators ofall satelltes located within 6 degrees of your target satellte agreeing to your proposed operations. Altematively, your application may request ALSAT as Points of Communication so long as you include a 2 degree compliance demonstration as specified in Section 25.209(f)" of the Commission‘s rules and reduce your input power density. Accordingly, pursuant to Section 25.112(@)(1)° ofthe Commission‘s rules, 47 C.FR. § 25.112(a)(1), and Section 0.261 of the Commission‘s rules on delegations of authority, 47 C.RR. §.0.261, we dismiss your application as defective without prejudice to refiling. Sincerely, AwDA KeiQic Scott A. Kotler Chief, Systems Analysis Branch Satellite Division * 47CER Seeton 25212000 * arorm g2s200 5 47 CR Section 25.112@() Se also EchostarSatellte LLC, Order on Reconsideration, DA Ot— 4056 (released Deceber 27 2004)


Document Created: 2005-08-10 13:04:29
Document Modified: 2005-08-10 13:04:29
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC