Attachment DISMISSAL LETTER

This document pretains to SES-LIC-20050519-00623 for License on a Satellite Earth Station filing.

IBFS_SESLIC2005051900623_434981

[v‘ \i Federal Communications Commission d : Washington, D.C. 20554 AHP DA 05—1582 June 3, 2005 Thomas P. Van Wazer Sidley Austin Brown & Wood LLP 1501 K Street NW Washington, DC 20005 Re: Call Sign: EOSO144 SES—LIC—20050519—00623 Dear Mr. Van Wazer: On May 19, 2005, WBNS—TV, Inc.filed the above—captioned application for a Temporary—Fixed Ku—BandEarth Station. Pursuant to Section 25.1 12(@)(1) of the Commission‘s rules, 47 C.FR. § 25.112(a)(1), we dismiss this application as defective because ofintemal inconsistencies in the power levels provided. Specifically, there are inconsistencies for the Equivalent Isotropic Radiated Power (EIRP) provided in the application when compared with that derived from other data in the application. In Form 312 Schedule B, you indicate that the Total EIRP for All Carriers is 55.0 dBW (ftem B40), while the computed Total EIRP for All Carriers is 67.04 dBW derived from the "16 Watts Maximum Total Input Power at the Antenna Flange (ltem E38)and "S5 dBi Antenna Gain Transmit (em E41). We note that the Anterna Gain specified in Schedule B (ltem E41) does not match the value used in Exhibit A of your Application. We also note that the Antenna Gains listed in Ttem E41 were specified at a frequency outside your intended use as stated in the application. Moreover, the EIRP Density you provided in the application does not agree with that derived from otherinformation in the application. Specifically,in Item E49, you indicate that the Maximum EIRP Density per Carrieris ~17.5 dBW4 kHz. This value is less than and therefore inconsistent with the average value of +15.46 dBW/4 kHe as derived from the Maximum EIRP per carrier of 55.0 dBW (Item E48) and a 36 MHz bandwidth for the 36MOFSW and 36MOGTF emissions (ltem E47). Given these inconsistencies, we cannot determine the actual emission power in use. 11174422 and 140—145 Gite bnds

EEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS CcomMtsstON pa osisse Accordingly, pursuant to Section 25.112(a)(1)° othe Commission‘s rules, 47 C.ER. § 25.112(a)(1), and Section 0.261 ofthe Commission‘s ules on delegations of authority, 47 C.FR. §0.261, we dismiss your application as defective without prejudice to refiling." Sincerely, /\J ”,;VJK, A KC’U\/\/ Scott A. Kotler Chief, Systems Analysis Branch Satellite Division International Bureau * 47 CR Section 25.112(@)(). See also Echostar Satelite LLC, Order on Reconsiderarion, DA Ot— 4056 (rleased December 272004) . If WBNS—TV, Inc. refilesanapplication identicalt he one dismissed, wththe exception of supplying the missingand correted informationit need not pay an applcationfee. See 47 CBR. Section1.1109(4)


Document Created: 2005-06-03 10:17:58
Document Modified: 2005-06-03 10:17:58
© 2025 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC