Attachment Letter

This document pretains to SES-LIC-20050407-00403 for License on a Satellite Earth Station filing.

IBFS_SESLIC2005040700403_436824

Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 Da 05—1656 June 14, 200 Mike Korlowski Globalstar USA, LLC 461 S. Milpitas Blvc. Milpitas, CA 95035 Re: Call Sign: EOS0097 File No. SES—L1C—20050407—00403 Call Sign: E050098 File No. SES—L1C—20050407—00404 Call Sign: E050099 File No. SES—LIC—20050407—00408 Call Sign: 2050100 File No. SES—LIC—20050407—00409 Dear Mr. Korlowskiz On April 7, 2005, Globalstar USA, LLC ("Globalstar®)filed the above—captioned applications to seek earth station feeder link authority for its Big LEO Mobile Satellite Service (MSS) system in Sebring, Florida. Globalstar requested consolidated treatment of these applications. Pursuantto Section 25. 1 12(a)(1) ofthe Commission‘s rules, 47 C.FR. §25.112(a)(1), we dismis all four applications as defective, without prejudice to refiling, because of interal inconsistencies provided within each application. Under Section 2.202(g)of the Commission‘s Rules,‘ the emission designator for an "unmodulated CW" emission that you lsted in all four applications in Item E50 of Form 312, Schedule B should be "NON"for Item E47. Since such an emission has no bandwidih, the 50 kHz bandwidth in the emission designator "SOKONON®(ftem E47) listed in all four applications is inconsistent with an unmodulated emission. We also take this opportunity to apprise Globalstar of other concerns we have that Globalstarshould correctif it chooses to refile these applications. We note that the applications list PERMITTED LIST as the Points of Communication. Since satellits in the PERMITTED LIST use onl the conventional C—Band" or conventional Ku—Band," unc porg. "37—42 Gie and $925..425 Gite

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS CoMmIssION DA 05—1656 Globalstar should replace PERMITTED LIST with the appropriate Point of Communication to avoid internal inconsistencies. In addition, although we are not dismissing these applications on this basis, we are unclear how the 59 dBW/4 kHz (lem E49) Maximum EIRP Density per Carrier is derived for the emission associated with designator "SOKONON® and we ask that this be demonstrated in your refiling. Alternatively, if the emission employs a technique such as Amplitude Shift Keying (ASK), Frequency Shift Keying (FSK), or Phase Shift Keying (PSK) and the spectrum is translated upward in frequency from the bascband signal, an appropriate emission designator other than "NON" should be provided. Accordingly, pursuant to Section 25.112(z)(1) ofthe Commission‘s rules, 47 C.FR. §25.112(@)(1), and Section 0.261 of the Commission‘s rules on delegations of authority, 47 C.RR, §0.261, we dismiss your applications as defective without prejudice to refiling. Sincerely, A aA 24. . /) m YH. ?{;fl\,\ & Scott A. Kotler Chief, Systems Analysis Branch Sutellite Division International Bureau M 1104122 OHZ and 140445 Ge: "If Globaltarrefiles anapplcation identcalt theon dismissed, wth the exception of supplying the corrected informationit need not pay an application fee. See 47 CBR. Section1.1109(0)


Document Created: 2005-06-14 16:09:39
Document Modified: 2005-06-14 16:09:39
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC