Ligado Ex Parte Lett

Ex PARTE PRESENTATION NOTIFICATION LETTER submitted by Ligado Networks LLC

Ligado Ex Parte Letter for May 20 2019 FCC Meeting

2019-05-22

This document pretains to SES-AMD-20180531-00856 for Amended Filing on a Satellite Earth Station filing.

IBFS_SESAMD2018053100856_1693716

                                                                  May 22, 2019

Ms. Marlene H. Dortch
Secretary
Federal Communications Commission
445 12th Street, S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20554

       Re:     Notice of Ex Parte Presentation, WT Docket No. 19-116; IB Docket No. 11-
               109; IBFS File Nos. SES-MOD-20151231-00981, SAT-MOD-20151231-00090,
               and SAT-MOD-20151231-00091


Dear Ms. Dortch:

        On May 20, 2019, Valerie Green, Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer of
Ligado Networks LLC (“Ligado”), Justin Lilley of TeleMedia Policy, and the undersigned met
with Aaron Goldberger, Acting Wireless Advisor to Chairman Pai. The parties discussed how
the record before the Commission regarding Ligado’s pending license modification applications
is complete and the Commission should proceed promptly to approve these applications which
have now been pending before the Commission for more than three years.

         In particular, the parties discussed Ligado’s commitment to mitigate any impact on U.S.
government GPS devices, including the repair or replacement of such devices as necessary, both
pre- and post-deployment. With respect to commercial use of GPS, the parties reviewed the co-
existence agreements with the five major GPS device manufacturers (agreement which resulted
in the development of parameters proposed in the applications), the thousands of hours of testing
at NASCTN, and Ligado’s adoption of the power level recommended in the DOT Report for the
lower downlink channel (1526-1536 MHz) ─ all of which confirm and ensure that Ligado’s
terrestrial operations will not cause harmful interference to commercial GPS devices. Moreover,
the record demonstrates that GPS is fully protected at 1 dB C/N0 level in the spectrum band
allocated to GPS/GNSS (1559-1610 MHz), that no parties express concerns about an impact to
GPS devices from the proposed operations in the uplink bands at 1627.5-1637.5 and 1646.5-
1656.5 MHz, and that, in the lower downlink, Ligado’s proposal affords GPS protection from
harmful interference and creates a 23 megahertz guard band for GPS.

       Furthermore, with respect to commercial use of SATCOM, the record shows that
Inmarsat is developing a commercial and technical plan to address any potentially necessary


retrofitting, and all aviation stakeholders are involved in the development and approval of this
new technology. 1

        Finally, with respect to claims made recently by Iridium Communications Inc.
(“Iridium”), 2 the parties made clear that Ligado seeks to compete with Iridium for IoT
customers, and that the analysis in the record establishes that Iridium’s concerns lack any
engineering basis. 3 This conclusion was confirmed by Iridium’s largest customer, the U.S.
Department of Defense, which sponsored an analysis of this issue by Alion. 4 We emphasized
that given this evidence, it is obvious Iridium’s claims are nothing but the old Washington trick
of using a regulatory process to harm a competitor. Repetition of old claims does not rebut these
hard facts, and the Commission should see through this transparent attempt to game the
regulatory process.

        We concluded by urging the Commission to approve the license modification
applications and complete the rulemaking for 1675-1680 MHz to unleash 40 megahertz of mid-
band spectrum for 5G services that can truly meet the needs of industrial users and advance the
Internet of Things.

       Please direct any questions to the undersigned.

                                                             Sincerely,

                                                             /s/ Gerard J. Waldron
                                                             Gerard J. Waldron
                                                             Ani Gevorkian
                                                             Counsel to Ligado Networks LLC
cc:    Mr. Goldberger


1
  See Reply Comments of Inmarsat Inc., IB Docket Nos. 11-109, 12-340; IBFS File Nos. SAT-
AMD-20180531-00044, SAT-AMD-20180531-00045.
2
  See Letter from Bryan N. Tramont, Counsel, Iridium Communications Inc., to Marlene H.
Dortch, Secretary, FCC, IBFS File Nos. SAT-AMD-20180531-00045, SAT-AMD-20180531-
00044, SES-AMD-20180531-00856; SES-MOD-20151231-00981, SAT-MOD-20151231-
00090, and SAT-MOD-20151231-00091; IB Docket Nos. 12-340, 11-109 (May 14, 2019),
Attachment at 4.
3
  See Letters from Gerard J. Waldron, Counsel, Ligado Networks, to Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary, FCC, IB Docket Nos. 11-109 and 12-340; IBFS File Nos. SES-MOD-20151231-
00981, SAT-MOD-20151231-00090, and
SAT-MOD-20151231-00091 (Jan. 16, 2017 and Nov. 2, 2016) (engineering analysis showing
that Ligado’s proposed terrestrial operations will not cause harmful interference to Iridium’s
operations).
4
  Reply Comments of Ligado Networks LLC, IB Docket No. 11-109, IBFS File Nos. SAT-
AMD-20180531-00044, SAT-AMD-20180531-00045, at 20-21 (July 19, 2018) (reporting on the
engineering analysis conducted under the aegis of the Department of Defense which concluded
Iridium’s devices will not experience harmful interference).
                                                 2



Document Created: 2019-05-22 20:14:14
Document Modified: 2019-05-22 20:14:14

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC