Attachment Narrative

This document pretains to SES-AMD-20110809-00937 for Amended Filing on a Satellite Earth Station filing.

IBFS_SESAMD2011080900937_911132

                                    Before the
                      FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
                               Washington, D.C. 20554

                                                      )
In the Matter of                                      )
                                                      )   Call Sign E050196
EchoStar 77 Corporation                               )
                                                      )
Amendment to Application to Modify Blanket            )   File No. SES-MFS-20110707-00793
Earth Station License to Add QuetzSat-1, a            )
Mexican-Licensed DBS Satellite at 77° W.L., as        )
a Point of Communication                              )
                                                      )


                           AMENDMENT TO APPLICATION
                   TO MODIFY BLANKET EARTH STATION AUTHORITY

       EchoStar 77 Corporation (“EchoStar 77”) submits this minor amendment to its request to

modify its authority to operate 1,000,000 receive-only earth stations in the United States to

receive Direct Broadcast Satellite (“DBS”) service from the nominal 77° W.L. orbital location

allotted by the International Telecommunication Union (“ITU”) to Mexico. Specifically,

EchoStar 77 has learned from the QuetzSat-1 operator that the cross-polarization isolation over

certain regions of the satellite’s coverage area deviates by a somewhat larger amount than

previously known from the minimum 30 dB required by Sections 25.215 (for DBS) and

25.210(i)(1) (for Fixed-Satellite Service) of the Commission’s rules, and does so over certain

additional territory.1 Nevertheless, the additional shortfall does not create any risk of



1
 47 C.F.R. § 25.215 (“Space station antennas operating in the Direct Broadcast Satellite Service
must be designed to provide a cross-polarization isolation such that the ratio of the on-axis co-
polar gain to the cross-polar gain of the antenna in the assigned frequency band shall be at least
30 dB within its primary coverage area.”); id. § 25.210(i) (“Space station antennas in the Fixed-
Satellite Service . . . must be designed to provide a cross-polarization isolation such that the ratio
of the on axis co-polar gain to the cross-polar gain of the antenna in the assigned frequency band
shall be at least 30 dB within its primary coverage area.”).

                                                  1


interference with nearby, co-frequency DBS slots, and creates only insubstantial amounts of self-

interference that have already been factored into the submitted link budgets.

         EchoStar 77 previously understood that the cross polarization isolation would fall short of

Commission standards only over certain small regions of the United States, and then only to a

limit of just over 27 dB. Consistent with this understanding, in its Application, EchoStar 77

requested a waiver of Sections 25.215 and 25.210(i)(1) of the rules to the extent this limited

shortfall required. EchoStar 77 now asks to amend its Application to request a waiver of

Sections 25.215 and 25.210(i)(1) of the rules to permit operation of QuetzSat-1 with the

following limits of cross polarization isolation performance:

                West Antenna: 26.5 dB in CONUS; 26.2 dB outside CONUS

                East Antenna: 25.2 dB in CONUS

         The above parameters represent the worst-case scenarios of cross-polarization isolation

performance. For most of the transponders providing service over most of the coverage area,

performance will meet Commission requirements. It is only certain transponders over certain

regions, usually nearer the edges of the coverage region, where cross-polarization isolation will

fall below 30 dB, but not below the above limits.

         Commission rules may be waived if there is good cause to do so.2 Even with this

increased variance from the Commission’s cross-polarization isolation standards, this waiver

request remains in line with previous waivers granted by the Commission.3 As the International



2
    See 47 C.F.R. § 1.3; WAIT Radio v. FCC, 418 F.2d 1153 (D.C. Cir. 1969).
3
  See EchoStar Satellite Operating Corp., Order and Authorization, 21 FCC Rcd. 14780 ¶ 6-7
(2006) (waiving the cross polarization requirement when satellite performed with cross
polarization isolation of 22 dB in the downlink bands and 20 dB in the uplink bands) (“EchoStar
9 Lower Ka-band Order”); see also DIRECTV Enterprises LLC, Order and Authorization, 20
FCC Rcd. 15778, 15779 ¶ 7 (2005) (waiving Section 25.215 when the cross-polarization
                                                  2


Bureau explained in one case, “[l]icensees may use cross-polarization isolation different from

that specified for the Region 2 BSS Plan if they demonstrate that such a difference does not

result in interference to other operational or planned systems, including U.S. licensed systems.”4

         This is the case here. The 3-5 dB shortfall creates insubstantial amounts of self-

interference that have already been factored into the link budgets submitted with Schedule S.

The shortfall will not create any interference to adjacent, co-frequency DBS orbital slots, the

nearest of which is in excess of four degrees away at 72.7° W.L. EchoStar 77 hereby certifies

that, except as described in this amendment request, no information in its modification

application has changed. Accordingly, consistent with past precedent, a waiver of Sections

25.215 and 25.210(i)(1) of the Commission’s rules is still warranted here.




                                               Respectfully submitted,



                                               ____________/s/___________________
                                               Pantelis Michalopoulos
                                               Stephanie A. Roy
                                               L. Lisa Sandoval
                                               STEPTOE & JOHNSON LLP
                                               1330 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.
                                               Washington, D.C. 20036
                                               (202) 429-3000
                                               Counsel for EchoStar 77 Corporation


August 9, 2011

isolation of DIRECTV 5’s DBS antennas was typically 27 dB over the satellite’s primary
coverage area); Star One S.A., Order, 19 FCC Rcd. 16334 ¶ 12 (2004); New Skies Satellites
N.V., Order, 17 FCC Rcd. 10369 ¶ 19 (2002) (waiving the cross polarization isolation
requirement when the satellite’s performance was in the range of 25-30 dB).
4
    DIRECTV Enterprises LLC, 20 FCC Rcd. at 15779 ¶ 7.

                                                  3


           CERTIFICATION OF PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR PREPARING
                       ENGINEERING INFORMATION

        I, Krish Jonnalagadda, hereby certify under penalty of perjury that I am the technically
qualified person responsible for preparation of the technical information contained in the
foregoing document; that I am familiar with the technical requirements of Part 25; and that I
either prepared or reviewed the technical information contained in the exhibit and that it is
complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge, information and belief.



                                             ________/s/____________________
                                             Krish Jonnalagadda
                                             Manager, Satellite Market Development
                                             SES Americom, Inc.




                                                 4



Document Created: 2011-08-09 17:18:27
Document Modified: 2011-08-09 17:18:27

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC