FCC Deferral Request

LETTER submitted by US DOJ

deferral letter

2017-01-18

This document pretains to SCL-T/C-20161212-00025 for Transfer of Control on a Submarine Cable Landing filing.

IBFS_SCLTC2016121200025_1166583

                                               Federal Communications Commission                                                        FCC 17-142


                                                          Before the
                                               Federal Communications Commission
                                                     Washington, D.C. 20554


In the Matter of                                                             )
                                                                             )
Applications of Level 3 Communications, Inc. and                             )          WC Docket No. 16-403
CenturyLink, Inc. For Consent to Transfer Control                            )
of Licenses and Authorizations                                               )

                                           MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Adopted: October 27, 2017                                                                                       Released: October 30, 2017

By the Commission: Chairman Pai and Commissioners O’Rielly and Carr issuing separate statements;
Commissioner Clyburn dissenting and issuing a statement; Commissioner Rosenworcel approving in part,
dissenting in part and issuing a statement.

                                                          TABLE OF CONTENTS

                                                                                                                                                   Para.

I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 1
II. BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................................... 4
     A. Description of the Applicants .......................................................................................................... 4
        1. CenturyLink, Inc. ...................................................................................................................... 4
        2. Level 3 Communications, Inc.................................................................................................... 5
     B. Description of the Transaction ......................................................................................................... 6
III. STANDARD OF REVIEW AND PUBLIC INTEREST FRAMEWORK ............................................ 8
IV. QUALIFICATIONS OF APPLICANTS AND COMPLIANCE WITH
     COMMUNICATIONS ACT AND FCC RULES AND POLICIES .................................................... 12
V. POTENTIAL PUBLIC INTEREST HARMS ...................................................................................... 15
     A. Loss of Level 3 as a Competitive Provider of Last-Mile Business Data Services and
        Long-Haul Transport ..................................................................................................................... 17
        1. Loss of Facilities-Based Fiber Competition for Last-Mile BDS in CenturyLink’s
            Incumbent LEC Region. .......................................................................................................... 18
        2. Loss of Facilities-Based Fiber Competition Outside of CenturyLink’s Incumbent
            LEC Region. ............................................................................................................................ 26
        3. Loss of Level 3 as an Independent Provider of Lit and Dark Long-Haul Fiber
            Transport Services. .................................................................................................................. 29
     B. Other Issues.................................................................................................................................... 34
     C. Loss of Level 3 as a Competitive Provider of Transit Service ...................................................... 43
     D. Loss of Level 3 as an International Submarine Cable Transport Provider .................................... 48
VI. ANALYSIS OF POTENTIAL PUBLIC INTEREST BENEFITS....................................................... 50
     A. Claimed Public Interest Benefits ................................................................................................... 52
        1. Claims that the Combined Company Will Have Greater Reach and be a Stronger
            Competitor. .............................................................................................................................. 52
        2. Claims of a More Extensive, Robust Network and Expanded Array of Services. .................. 54
        3. Claims that the Combined Company Will Benefit from Continuity in Experienced
            Leadership and Success in Prior Acquisition Integration. ....................................................... 59
        4. Claims of an Improved Financial Profile, Including More than $975 Million in
            Annual Run-Rate Synergies. ................................................................................................... 61



Document Created: 2017-01-18 09:08:21
Document Modified: 2017-01-18 09:08:21

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC