Attachment information

information

SUBMISSION FOR THE RECORD submitted by Star One

information

2004-05-05

This document pretains to SAT-PPL-20031230-00367 for Permitted List on a Satellite Space Stations filing.

IBFS_SATPPL2003123000367_372690

                                     ST E PTO E aJo H N S O N                    LLP

                                               A T T O R N E Y S AT LAW



     Alfred Marnlet                                                                             1330 Connecticut Avenue, NW
     202.429.6205                                                                                Washington, DC 20036-1795
     amamlet@steptoe.com                                                                                  Tel 202.429.3000
                                                                                                           Fax 202.429.3902
                                                                                                                 steptoe.com

     VZA HAND DELIVERY
                                                             RECEIVED
April 22,2004                                                  APR 2 2 2004
                                                         emm COMMUNICATIONS       COMM15610N
Marlene H. Dortch                                              OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY
Federal Communications Commission
Office of the Secretary
445 12th Street, SW                                                                        15



Washington, DC 20554
                                                                                           %/q#
                                                                                       IOte%& f3ran,
Re:          Star One S.A. Petition for Declaratory Ruling To Add the Star One C1ow%+eu
             Satellite at 65O W.L. to the Permitted-Space Station List;
             Call Sign S2611, File No. SAT-PPL-20031230-00367

Dear Ms. Dortch:

       Star One S.A. (“Star One”) hereby submits the following additional information for association
with the above-referenced petition for declaratory ruling. Star One seeks to clarify the implementation
schedule for the Star One C 1 satellite, to inform the space station milestones established by the
Commission in connection with grant of the petition.

        As indicated in the petition, Star One has executed a contract with Alcatel Space for the Star One
C 1 satellite and construction of the satellite has begun? More specifically, construction has commenced
on certain long lead-time items (i.e., elements of the spacecraft that will not change even if the other
aspects of the satellite are modified while finalizing the design), but other critical milestones have not
yet occurred. The planned implementation schedule for the Star One C1 is set forth below:




~~               ~




             ’
        Star One S.A. Petition for Declaratory Ruling To Add the Star One C1 Satellite at 65O W.L. to
the Permitted Space Station List, File No. SAT-PPL-2003 1230-00367 (rel. Dec. 30,2003).

                 See id.at 7.




                      WASH I NGTON   PHOENIX         LOS ANCELES             LONDON                BRUSSELS


Marlene H. Dortch
April 22,2004
Page 2


       Star One C1 Implementation Schedule
         Satellite construction contract: 30 September 2003
         Commencement of construction: November 2003
         Preliminary Design Review (“PDR”): February 2004
         Critical Design Review (“CDR”): December 2004
         Launch: June 2006

This implementation schedule is consistent with the space station milestones imposed by the
Commission in connection with placing unlaunched foreign-licensed satellites on the Permitted Space
Station List.

        To afford foreign-licensed satellite operators the same amount of time to implement their
networks as U.S. space station licensees, the Commission examines the milestones actually completed
by the foreign satellite operator and calculates from the grant of the petition the time to complete m e t
milestones permitted under the Commission’s implementation schedule for geostationary satellites. For
example, in the EstreZa do SuZ Order; construction of the satellite had been completed (thus the contract
execution, CDR and commencement of construction milestones had been satisfied) and the only w e t
milestone was launch and operation of the satellite. Accordingly, the Commission looked to the
milestone immediately preceding the m e t launch and operation milestone -- commencement of
construction -- and afforded the operator two years (the full period between thesmilestones) fkom grant
of the petition to launch its satellite!

       In this case, although Star One has executed a construction contract for the Star One C 1 satellite,
the CDR will not be conducted until December 2004. Thus, the Commission must look to the milestone
immediately preceding the m e t CDR milestone -- contract execution -- and establish dates for the
remaining milestones based on the grant date of the petition. Specifically, Star One should be afforded
one year fkom the date of grant to complete CDR for the Star One C1 satellite, two years from grant to
commence construction, and four years from grant to launch and operate the ~atellite.~   As noted above,
the implementation schedule for the Star One C1 satellite fully satisfies these milestones.



      See, e.g., Loral Skynet do Brad Petition for Declaratory Ruling to Add Estrela do Sul 1 to the
Commission’sPermitted Space Station List, Order, DA 03-4095, (rel. Dec. 23,2003).

         Id at 716.
         In this regard, commencing construction on certain long lead-time items should in no way
reduce the period of time afforded to Star One to launch and operate the satellite, particularly because
construction of the communications payload and related elements of the spacecraft cannot commence in
earnest until the satellite design has been finalized in the CDR.


Marlene H. Dortch
April 22,2004
Page 3


         Any questions regarding this matter may be directed to the undersigned.
                                             Respectfully submitted,


                                             Alfred Mamlet
                                             Carlos M. Nalda
                                             Counselfor Star One S A .

cc:      Fern Jarmulnek
         Jennifer Gilsenan
         Cornel1 Williams
         Kal Krautkramer



Document Created: 2004-05-11 17:01:01
Document Modified: 2004-05-11 17:01:01

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC