Intelsat 5 to 157 E.

LETTER submitted by Intelsat License LLC

Supplemental Response

2014-12-19

This document pretains to SAT-MOD-20140829-00097 for Modification on a Satellite Space Stations filing.

IBFS_SATMOD2014082900097_1071710

                                                                                                Jennifer D. Hindin
1776 K STREET NW          December 19, 2014                                                     202.719.4975
WASHINGTON, DC 20006                                                                            jhindin@wileyrein.com
PHONE     202.719.7000
FAX       202.719.7049

                          Ms. Marlene Dortch
7925 JONES BRANCH DRIVE
MCLEAN, VA 22102
                          Secretary
PHONE     703.905.2800
                          Federal Communications Commission
FAX       703.905.2820    445 12th Street, S.W.
                          Washington, D.C. 20554
www.wileyrein.com
                          Re:    Supplemental Response to the Petition to Deny or Defer of ABS Global,
                                 Ltd., File No. SAT-MOD-20140829-00097

                          Dear Ms. Dortch:

                          Intelsat files this supplemental response to the Reply of ABS Global, Ltd. (“ABS”)
                          in the above-referenced proceeding.1 ABS continues to oppose Intelsat’s efforts to
                          ensure continuity of service to its customers by replacing the Intelsat 706 satellite
                          with the technically equivalent Intelsat 5 satellite at the 157.0° E.L. orbital
                          location.2 As discussed in Intelsat’s prior filings addressing this matter, ABS’s
                          opposition lacks legal justification and represents a transparent attempt to
                          manipulate the FCC’s licensing process to gain leverage in ITU coordination
                          negotiations regarding future services on a satellite with lower ITU priority—to the
                          detriment of Intelsat’s customers.

                          Intelsat 5 uses the same C-band frequencies and power levels as the previously
                          operated Intelsat 706 satellite. The power levels used by both Intelsat 706 and
                          Intelsat 5 meet the power levels set forth in Section 25.212 for the C-band.3
                          Accordingly, there simply is no basis upon which the FCC can deny the Intelsat 5
                          application.

                          Furthermore, Intelsat has priority in the relevant C-band frequencies at 157.0° E.L.
                          by virtue of the fact that its ITU filing has been listed in the Master Register. ABS’

                          1
                                  Reply of ABS Global, Ltd., File No. SAT-MOD-20140829-00097 (filed
                          Dec. 1, 2014); Response of Intelsat License LLC, File No. SAT-MOD-20140829-
                          00097 (filed Nov. 24, 2014) (“Intelsat Response”); Petition to Deny or Defer of
                          ABS Global, Ltd., File No. SAT-MOD-20140829-00097 (filed Nov. 13, 2014).
                          2
                                  Application of Intelsat License LLC to Modify Authorization for Intelsat 5,
                          Call Sign S2704; File No. SAT-MOD-20140829-00097 at 3 (filed Aug. 29, 2014)
                          (“Intelsat 5 Modification Application”).
                          3
                                See Letter from Susan H. Crandall to Marlene H. Dortch, SAT-MOD-
                          20140829-00097 (filed Sept. 25, 2014).


Ms. Marlene Dortch
December 19, 2014
Page 2


petition simply seeks to co-opt the FCC’s licensing process to eliminate the
important distinctions between fully notified ITU filings that have been listed in the
Master Register and filings still at the notification phase. As has been the case with
the FCC’s two-degree rule, foreign operators—such as ABS—continue to attempt
to exploit U.S. regulations and the FCC’s processes to force U.S.-licensed operators
to provide concessions in coordination negotiations. In light of this, Intelsat urges
the Commission to disregard ABS’ petition and expeditiously grant the pending
modification application to ensure Intelsat’s continued ability to serve its customers.

Please contact the undersigned with any questions.

Sincerely,

/s/ Jennifer D. Hindin

Jennifer D. Hindin
Counsel for Intelsat

cc:    Jose Albuquerque
       Karl Kensinger
       Stephen Duall
       Kathyrn Medley
       Jay Whaley
       Cindy Spiers


Ms. Marlene Dortch
December 19, 2014
Page 3


                               Certificate of Service

I, Colleen King, hereby certify that on this 19th day of December 2014, a copy of
the foregoing letter is being sent via electronic mail to the following:


                                         Arlene Kahng
                                         General Counsel
                                         O’Hara House
                                         3 Bermudiana Road
                                         Hamilton HM08
                                         Bermuda
                                         Arlene@absatellite.net




                                                  /s/ Colleen King
                                                  Colleen King



Document Created: 2014-12-19 15:33:25
Document Modified: 2014-12-19 15:33:25

© 2025 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC