Attachment VIASAT -DA 092481 re

VIASAT -DA 092481 re

LETTER submitted by IB, FCC

DA 09-2481

2009-11-24

This document pretains to SAT-MOD-20090819-00090 for Modification on a Satellite Space Stations filing.

IBFS_SATMOD2009081900090_783457

                               Federal Communications Commission
                                         Washington, D.C. 20554

                                                                                              DA 09—2481

                                              November 24, 2009



John P. Janka, Esq.
Latham & Watkins LLP
555 Eleventh Street
10‘ Floor
Washington, D.C. 20004

                                                     Re: ViaSat, Inc., Application to Modify Authorization to
                                                          Add Ka—band NGSO FSS Frequencies to VIASAT—
                                                           KA1 at 77.3° W.L., IBFS File No. SAT—MOD—
                                                           20090819—00090 (Call Sign: $2737)

Dear Mr. Janka:

     On August 19, 2009, ViaSat, Inc. (ViaSat) filed the above—captioned application to modify its
authorization for the VIASAT—77 geostationary—orbit (GSO) satellite (Call Sign $2737).‘ ViaSat is
authorized to construct, launch, and operate VIASAT—77 at the 77.3° W.L. orbital location in the 18.3—18.8
GHz, 19.7—20.2 GHz, 28.35—28.6 GHz, and 29.25—30.0 GHz frequency bands. In its modification
application, ViaSat seeks authority to add the Ka—band frequencies in the 18.8—19.3 GHz and 28.6—29.1 GHz
frequency bands to its authorization and to operate in these frequencies on a non—interference basis." These
frequencies are allocated to the non—geostationary orbit (NGSO) fixed—satellite service (FSS) ("NGSO FSS
frequency bands"). For the reasons discussed below, we dismiss the modification application without
prejudice to refiling.

      Section 25.112 of the Commission‘s rules requires the Commuission to return, as unacceptable for filing,
any space station application that is not substantially complete, contains internal inconsistencies, or does not
substantially comply with the Commission‘s rules." In its filing, ViaSat attached a set of link budget _
analyses to its Schedule S form, but did not include analyses for the NGSO FSS frequency bands requested
in its modification application.‘ ViaSat also conducted its interference analysis based on link budget
information provided in a prior application, which did not include the requested NGSO FSS frequency
bands." Consequently, we dismiss ViaSat‘s modification application as defective. We request ViaSat
provide, in any refiling, the required link budget information as attachments in Schedule S (Table $13,


‘ ViaSat‘s authorization was grant stamped with conditions on July 18, 2007. See ViaSat, Inc., IBFS File No. SAT—
LOA—20070314—00051. On November 18, 2009, ViaSat, Inc. notified the Commission that it had changed the satellite‘s
name from ViaSat—KA1l to ViaSat—77. Letter to Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, FCC, from Elizabeth R. Park, Counsel
for ViaSat, Inc. (November 18, 2009).
 See SAT—MOD—20090819—00090, Exhibit A.
347 CFR. § 25.112.
* SAT—MOD—20090819—00090, Schedule S, Table $13, Column (g).
* SAT—MOD—20090819—00090, Supplemental Technical Annex, Section A.6.1 on Page 6. See also SAT—MOD—
20080718—00144.


                                        Federal Communications Commission                                   DA 09—2481




Column (g)) and the associated interference analysis in the narrative and/or supplemental technical annex of
the application.

     In addition, Section 25.114(c)(13) of the Commussion‘s rules requires applicants to provide the
polarization information specified in Section 25.210, as applicable, to verify that the proposed space station
is designed to provide a cross—polarization isolation value of 30 dB.° ViaSat‘s application shows that the
ratio of the on axis co—polar gain to the cross polar gain of the antenna in the requested frequency bands is 26
dB within its primary coverage area.‘ Because ViaSat‘s application does not conform to the Commission‘s
rules and ViaSat did not request a waiver of Section 25.114(c)(13), its application is also dismissed on this
ground. If ViaSat elects to refile its application, it should propose to operate with conforming cross—
polarization isolation, or it should request a waiver of Section 25.114(c)(13) and provide the appropriate
justification for its grant.°

      We also note that ViaSat‘s application states that "[ufTplink transmissions from the blanket—licensed
terminals will be restricted to the 28.35—29.1 GHz and 29.5—30 GHz bands."" Section 25.138 of the
Commission‘s rules, does not list the 28.6—29.1 GHz frequency band as being available for blanket
licensing." We request ViaSat to clarify, in any refiling, its system design requirements within the 28.6—29.1
GHz frequency bands with regard to blanket licensing.

     Accordingly, pursuant to Section 25.112(a)(1) of the Commission‘s rules, 47 C.F.R. § 25.112(a)(1),
and Section 0.261 of the Commission‘s rules on delegated authority, 47 C.F.R. § 0.261, we dismiss the
modification application of ViaSat, Inc. without prejudice to refiling.


                                                                Sincerely,

                                                                 Fim} %Mwawu
                                                                Fern J. Jarmulnek
                                                                Deputy Chief, Satellite Division
                                                                International Bureau




647 C.F.R. § 25.114(c)(13).
747 C.F.R. § 25.210(0)(1).
® If ViaSat refiles an application identical to the one dismissed, with the exception of supplying the corrected
information, it need not pay an application fee. See 47 C.F.R. § 1.1111(d).

° See SAT—MOD—20090819—00090, Supplemental Technical Annex, Section A.2 on Page 2.
©47 C.FR. § 25.138.



Document Created: 2019-04-09 18:48:42
Document Modified: 2019-04-09 18:48:42

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC