Attachment comments

comments

COMMENT submitted by New ICO Satellite Services GP

comments

2008-09-22

This document pretains to SAT-MOD-20080718-00143 for Modification on a Satellite Space Stations filing.

IBFS_SATMOD2008071800143_665724

                                       Before the
                         FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION                        FILED/Ac~E~TEB
                                  Washington, D.C. 20554
                                                                                     SEP 2 2 2008

In the Matter of
                                                         )
TerreStar Networks Inc.                                  )      File No. SAT-MOD-2008071 8-00143
                                                         )
Application for Modification of 2 GHz                    )      Call Sign S2633
Mobile Satellite Service Letter of Intent                1
Authorization                                            1
                                                         1
                                               COMMENTS

           New I C 0 Satellite Services G.P. (“ICO”), the holder of a 2 GHz mobile satellite

service (“MSS”) letter of intent (“LOI”) authorization, supports the grant of the above-

captioned application (“Application”) filed by TerreStar Networks, Inc. (“TerreStar”).

           In its Application, TerreStar requests an extension of the milestone deadlines for

launching its satellite and certifying its system operational to June 30 and August 30,

2009, respectively.’ TerreStar states that construction of its satellite is nearly complete

and that the underlying construction delay is due to unforeseeable circumstances beyond

its control.2

           The Commission has a longstanding policy of granting milestone extensions when

the delay is due to “circumstances beyond the licensee’s control” and particularly when

those circumstances involve “unanticipated technical problems with a satellite under

con~truction.”~
              Additionally, the Commission has considered “the extent of a satellite’s

construction and the amounts paid toward the total contract price” as factors in granting

                     ~   ~~   ~~~~




1
    See TerreStar Application, Exh. 1, at 1 (July 18, 2008).
    Id.
    See New I C 0 Satellite Services G.P., 22 FCC Rcd 2229, T[ 15 (II3 2007).


milestone extension   request^.^   Consistent with Commission’s established milestone

policy and in light of the substantial completion of TerreStar’s satellite, the Commission

should grant TerreStar’s milestone extension request.


                                                    Respectfully submitted,

                                                    NEW IC0 SATELLITE SERVICES G.P.


                                                     By:
Cheryl A. Tritt                                      suz
Phuokg N. Pham                                       Senior Vice President, Regulatory Affairs
Momson & Foerster LLP                                815 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Suite 610
2000 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Suite 5500               Washington, D.C. 20006
Washington, D.C. 20006

Its Counsel

September 22,2008




 Id,


dc-534933                                      2


                            CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE


       I hereby certify on this 22ndday of September 2008, a copy of the foregoing

Comments has been served via first class mail, postage pre-paid, to the following:

Douglas Brandon
TerreStar Networks, Inc.
12010 Sunset Hills Road, gthFloor
Reston, VA 20190

Jonathan L. Wiener
Goldber Godles Wiener & Wright
        8
1229 19' Street, NW
Washington, DC 20036-241 3
  Counsel to TerreStar Networks, Inc.



                                                    Tfieresa Rollins



Document Created: 2008-09-23 11:15:16
Document Modified: 2008-09-23 11:15:16

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC