Attachment Intelsat Ex Parte

This document pretains to SAT-MOD-20050926-00182 for Modification on a Satellite Space Stations filing.

IBFS_SATMOD2005092600182_498999

April 20, 2006 . Intelsat. inspiring connections Ms. Marlene H. Dortch Secretary Federal Communications Commission 445 12"" Street, S.W. C RECEIVED Washington, DC 20554 ' APR 2 0 2006 Re: File No. SAT—MOD—20050926—00182 > . , — Notice of Ex Parte Presentation Federal Communications Commission _ Office of Secretary Dear Ms. Dortch: ' On‘Wednesday, April 19, 2006, Intelsat Global Service Corporation ("‘Intelsat") representatives Susan H. Crandall, Assistant General Counsel; Humberto Henriques, Director, Telecommunications Policy and Regulatory Affairs; and RamManohar, Department Manager, Frequency Management, met with representatives of the Commission‘s International Bureau. — The Commission representatives were as follows: Andrea Kelly, Chief, Policy Branch; Kathyrn Medley, Acting Chief, Satellite Engineering Branch; Alyssa Roberts, Pohcy Branch; Steven Spaeth, Satellite Division; and Sy1v1a Lam Engineering Branch. — The Intelsat representatives reiterated arguments made in the company‘s March 27, 2006 . letter asking the Commission to dismiss,—or deny, ICO‘s request to utilize conventional C—band frequencies for LEOP, transfer orbit, and emergency TT&C onan ICO satellite that ICO seeks to collocate with Intelsat‘s IA—6 satellite at the nominal 93° W.L. location. The Intelsat representatives also described a meeting that had taken place between Intelsat and ICO in early ‘April, in which the operators had exchanged technical information about their respective satellites. The Intelsat representatives explained why ICO‘s proposed use of certain conventional C—band frequencies at the nominal 93° W.L. location would cause harmful interference into the telecommand and communications operations of IA—6. Finally, the Intelsat representatwes identified potential center — frequencies for ICO‘s telecommand carriers in the extended C—band, which, depending _ on the sense of polarization used, might ensure technical compatibility w1th collocated \ Intelsat satellites. | ‘ Consistent withSection 1.1206 of the FCC‘s rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.1206, an original and two copies of this letter are being filed for inclusion in the record of the above—referenced . proceeding. Intelsat Global Service Corporation * F+1 202—944—7898 3400 international Drive NW, Washington DC 20008—3006 USA www mtelsat com T +1 202—944—6800

Ms. Marlene H. Dortch April 20, 2006 —Page 2 If you have any questions, pleasecofltact the undersigned.© Sincerely, Cae leg . Susan H. Crandall ’ | ‘ Assistant General Counsel | cc: Andrea Kelly | _ Kathyrn Medley |._ Alyssa Roberts . Steven Spaeth _ Sylvia Lam


Document Created: 2019-05-29 17:42:13
Document Modified: 2019-05-29 17:42:13
© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC