Attachment grant

This document pretains to SAT-MOD-20050325-00077 for Modification on a Satellite Space Stations filing.

IBFS_SATMOD2005032500077_429918

mes_$ BT — MFD Repstia C007 CitSipn £27/5—GraDae W 5, ts (orotrideaitien Approved by OMB B .,.vfjj[gs L f ,s//L/,?:zo 30c0—078 Dateate & TimeTime Filed: Filed: Mar Mar 25 2008 5:¢1:38:1PM \ «2 feel Be=— Siol‘ie / File Number SAT—MOD—20050325—00077 Rabet 6, adeln (;1;,».( s nc FCC APPLICATION FoR SFACE AND EARTH STATION:MOD OR AND — MAIN FORM [FCC Use Ony ree 312 MamN rorM FoR OFRICIAL UE ONty APPLICANT INFORMATION Entera description ofthis application to identfy t on the main menu: AMG—12 modification — permanent assignment at offsct orbital location 32005 1—% Legal Name ofApplicant Name: Columbia Communications Phone Number: 609—087—4000 xtaas Corporation ona Fax Number: co0—007—033 Nime: Streets 4 Research Way E—Mai: nancy:eskenari@ses—americom com City: Princcton State: w County: USA Zipeote: oesso — Attentions Ms.Naney . Eskenazi

5—16. Name afContct Representativ (Iothe than applicant) Name KarisA. Hastings Phone Number: an—ear—5767 Company: Hogan & Hartson LLP Fax Number: a02—637—s010 Streets 555 ThinecnthSt, NW R—ma katastings@hnlawcom City: Washington State: pe Country: USA Zipeode: 20004—1109 Contact Relationship: Legal Counsel Tile: CLASSIRICATION OF FILING 17. Choose the button nex o the lelssiicationthat applesto this filingfor (NA)b1. Application for LicenseofNew Station both questions a. and . Choose only one (N/A) b2. Appliction for Registation ofNew DomestiReceive—Only Sution for 179 and only one for 17b. @ (NA) b3. Amendmentto a Pending Application @ (NWA) b4. Modifcation of License or Registation & 21. Earth Sution bS. Assignment of License oRegistration @ 32Space Stion b6. Transfer of Contol of Licensc or Registration & (N/A) b7. Notfietion of Minor Modifcation (N/A)b&. Applicationfor License of New Receive—Only Sition Using Non—US. icensed Sucllte (NA) b9. Leter oItentto Use Non—U. S Licensed Satlfite to Provide Servicein the United Stites & (NA) b10.Other (Please specity)

7cIsa fee submited withthis aplicaton? @ 1fYes, complete and atiach FCC Form 159. If No, indieat reason for fee exermption (ee 47 CFRSection L.1114), & GovernmentalEntty gy Noncommercial educational licensee q Othrfplease explin} Td P Classifation BFY ~ Space Station Modlifcation(Gcostationary) 18. Ifhis Aling i in refeence to an 19. If hisfilingis an amendment t a pendingapplication nter both elds, ifthis ling is a existing station, nter modifiction please enter onl the fil number () Callsign ostation: (») Date pending applcaton was fld: (6) File number: sans sarvopauoznstroo7s

TYPE oF SERVICE 20. NATURE OF SERVICE: Thisling i foran authorization to provide or us thfllowing typeGs) of services) Scectll tatapply a. Fixed Sitelite [C] bMobile Satelite [C] 6 Radiodetermination Satlite [C] 4 Banh Buploration Satelite J c Direc to Home Fixed Satelite [C] C Diital Audtio Radio Service [—] # Otfer (nlease specity) 21. STATUS: Choos the button next t t applicable tatus. Choose [2. fearth taion applicant, check all that apply only one [C] Using U leensed satlites & Common Carrier @ Non—Common Carier [Z] Using Non—U.S.lcensed srelites 23. Ifapplicantis providng INTERNATIONAL COMMON CARRIER servie, seeinstrictions razardingSee. 214 Ailings. Choose on, Are these fnclltes & Connected toa Public Switched Network gy Not connected to a Public Swiched Nework @ N/A 24. FREQUENCY BAND(G Place an ‘X in the boxfesnoxt t ll applicabl requency bando) E a. C—Band (@6 Gliz) D bs Ku—Band (12/14 Gite) [C] Other (Pease spcify upper and lowerfequencies in MH) Frequency Lower: Frequency Upper: (Please specify addional frequencies i anatachment)

TVPE OF STATION 25. CLASS OF STATION: Choose the button nexttclass of station that apples. Chooseonly ore. @ a. Hixed Bath Station @ b Temporay—Fixed BarthSation @ c 12114 GHteVSAT Network @5 0. Mobile BathStation @ 0. Geostitionary Space Sation 5 £ Non—Gcostationary Space Shition @ «. Other (pleasespeciy) 26 Tyre or Eaiem stanon raciuiry & TransmitReceive g Transmit—Only q Receve—Only @ NA "For Space Sition applcations, select NA."

PURPOSE OF MODIFICATION 27. The parpose of this proposed modification is to: (Pace an *X in theban(es) next to all that apply) [7] a suthoristionto d new eimisson designatorand relted srvice [] 5 —suthoriztionto change emission designatr and elatedservice [C] c — athoriation t increase EIRP and EIRP density [—] 4— suthorisation to replace antenna [C] c authoriation to add antemna [C] 6 authoriztion to relocate fixed station [C] a =— suthorisation to change frequency i) [C] h —authoriztionto add frequency (=b — authorization to add Pointof Communication (stelites & countics) [—] j —suthoriation to change Points of Communication (stelites & countrics) i authoriztion for ficiltiesfor which environmenta assessment and radiation hazardreporting is required i | —suthorization to change orbit location [C] m —authorization t perform flct management D n —authorization to extend milstones [C] 0— Other (Please sped

ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY 28. Would a Commission grant ofany proposaithis applicationor amendment have a signiican envronmental 0 Ys @ N impactas defined by 47 CFR 113072 IFYIES, submitthe sttementasrequied by Setions 11308 and 1.1311 of the Commission‘srules, 47 C.ER, 11308 and 1.1311, a an extibitto this appliation A Radiation Harard Study must accompany all applications for newtrnsmiting faciltcs, major modifeations, or majoramendments: ALEN OWNERSHIP Earth station applicants not proposing to provide broadcast, common carrier, acronautcalen route or aeronauticl fixed radio station services are not required to respond to Iems 30—34 29. s the applicana foreign governmentor therepresentaiveof any foreign goverment 9 Y« @ No 9 Na 30. s the applicant an alien or thereprescntative ofn alien? 0 Ys @ No o NA 31. s the applicant a corporation onganized under the lavs ofany freign govermmen? o ¥o @ No o NA 32. s heapplicant a corporation ofwhich morethan one—fithofthe capital stock is owned of record or voted by qy Yes @ No @> N/A altens ortheiepresentatives or by aforcign govemment or representative thereaor by any corporation oreanized wnderthe laws of foreign country?

33. s the applicant a corporation diectly oindiectly cantrlled by ny other corporation of which morethin @y ¥es y No @> N/A one—fourth of t capial stck is owned ofrecord or voed by liens, thir epresentatives, or bya oreign govermment o representtive thercooby any corpoation organized underthe laws offoreigncountry? 34,Ifany answer to questions 29, 30, 31, 32 and/or 3is Yes,attach as an exhibitanidentfcation of thaliensor ExhibitA foreign entites,thir nationalit, theirelationship o the applicant, and the percentage of stock they ouwn or vo BASIC QUALIFICATIONS 35, Docs the Applicant request any waivers or exemptions from any of the Commission‘s Rules? o en 1f¥es, ttach s an extbit, copies ofth requests for waivers or exeeptions with supportngdocuments. 36. Hasthe applicant or any party to thi appication or amendment had any FCC sttion authorizationor icnse es ow revaked or had any appliationforan inital, modification or renewal of FCC sation authorization, cense,or construction permit denied by the Commission? IfYes,atach as an exhiit, an expliation ofeircumstances Exhibich

37. Hasthe appliant, oany party tthis applicationor amendiment, o any pary dreciy oindirecly contrlling ovs @ xo the applicanever been convited ofa felony by any stae or federal court? f¥es,attach as anexhbit, an explination ofcircumstances. 38, Hasany court fnally adjudged the aplicant, or any person dirccly orindirectly contrailing the applicat, ovs e* guily ofunlawfully monopalizing orattempting unlawhill to monopalize radio communication,dircctly or direct,trough cantrol ofmanifictir orsale ofradio apparatus, exclusive traffc arangement orany other means or unfir methods ofcompertion?If¥s, atach as an extibit, an explantion ofircumstances 39. s the applicant,or any person diectly orindirecily contrlling the applicant,currenly a party in any pending oY« e No matierreferedto in the preceding two tems? Ifyes,attach asan exhint, an explanation of the circumstances 40. 1fhe applicanis a corportionanis applyingfora space stationleense,atach asanexhibitthe names, address, and citizenship of thosestockholdersowning a eeord andor voting 10 percent or more of the Filer‘s votingstockand the percentages so held. In the case of iduciary contol indicat th beneficiryiesor lass of ExtibiC beneficares. Alsolistthenames and addresses ofthe offcersand directors of the Filer

41, By checking Yes, the undersigned certifes, hatneither aplicant nor any other patyto the application is Ys g No subject o a denial ofFederl benefits thatincludes FCC beneftspursuantto Section 5301 ofthe Anti~Drag Act of 1988, 21 SC. Section 862, because ofa comviction forpostesionor ditibution ofa contralld substance. See 47 CFR 1.2002(b) for the meaningof&quotpartyto the application@iquat; fo these parposes. 42a, Dos the applicantintond to use a nonU.S. Heensed satlfitto rovide servicein the United Sttes? If¥o, oY« @N answer 42b and atach anexhibit providing the information specifed in 47 C.RR, 25.137,as appropriate. f No, proceed toquestion 43 42b, What adminisrationhas Heensed o s n theprocess oflcensingthe spacestation? Ifno enwill bssued, whatadininstation has coordinated oris in the process ofcoordinating the spacestation? ; Descripion. (Summarize he nature ofthapplicationand the srvices to be provided).. (1fthcomplete descrition does not appeain this Ioos, pleasego to the end ofthe form to view it n itentirety) se avc. 2 Au. T

CERTIFICATION [The Applicnt waives any laim to the use of any paticularfrequency or of th:electromgnctl spectrum asagainsthe regulitory power othe (United Stitesbecause ofthe previous use ofthesame, whether by eense or therwise, and requestsanauthoriztionin tecordance withthis tion.The applicant certifesthat grantofthisappliation would not cause the aplicant t bin vioation of thespectrum agrcpation imit 47 CFR Part 20. All statements made in exhibtsarea materil prthereofand areincarporated hereina iset out in fll n this appliation (The undesigned. individually and for theapplicant, hereby certifcsthatal statements madk n this aplication and in allatached exhibts are trie,completeand correct o the best ohior her knowledye and belie, andare madein good fith (¥. Applicantisa (any (Choose the button nexo aplcable response) @ Individual @ Unincorporated Asciation g Patmeniip @ Comontion @5 Govemmental Enity @ Other lease specity) 5. Name of Peson Signing 16. Tulsof Person Signing Naney J. Eskonazi Assistant Secrctuy =¢ wicuruL FALsE STATEMENTs MADE ON THIs FORM ARE PUNISHABLE Y FINE AND/ OR IMPRISONMENT (US. Code, Tite 18,Sction 1001),AND/OR REVOCATION OF ANY STATION AUTHORIZATION (US. Code, Tite 47, Section 312(@¥()) AND/OR FORFEITURE (U.S. Code, Tite 47, Section 502)

ree Novicerequiken By ThE APERWORK REDUCTION ACT "The public reporting forthis collectiono informationis esimated t average 2 hoursperresponse,incuding the tme for reviewing instrutions, searching existing data sources, athering and maintainingthe required data,and compleing and eviewingthe cllectionoinformation. Ifyou have any comments on this burden estimate, or how we can improve the colletion and reducethe burden it auses you, please wite t the Federal Communications Commission, AMD~PERM, Paperwork Reduction Project(3060—0674), Washington, DC 20554. We willalso accept your comments regarding the Paperwark Reduction Act aspects of this olletion via the Itemtif you sendthem toJholey@gov. PLEASE Do NoT SEND CoMPLETED FORMS To THIS ADDRESS. Remember—You are not requiredto respond to a collecon oinformation sponsored by the Federal covernment, and th govemment may not conduct or sponsor this colletion, unless it displays a currenty valid OMB contrl nurmber orif we fail to provideyou with thisnatice. ‘This colletion has been assigned an OMB control number of 3060—0678 Tik ForEGoING NOTICE is REQUIRED By THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT OF 199s, PUBLIC LAW 10+—13, octomeR 1, 1998, 44 U.S.C. SECTION3507. 12

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Application by COLUMBIA COMMUNICATIONS CORP. File No. SAT—STA— For Modification of AMC—12 Fixed—Satellite Space Station License APPLICATION OP COLUMBIA COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION Columbia Communications Corporation (*Columbia®) hereby respectfully requests a modification of its license for the AMC—12 fixed—satellite space station to assign the satellite permanently to the 37.45° W.L. orbital location. Columbia seeks to operate at a slight offeet from the 37.5° W.L. orbital position originally assigned to AMC—12 in order to effectuate an agreementon stationkeeping coordination with Loral Skynet, whose Telstar 11 spacecraft is also assigned to the 37.5° W.L.. nominal orbital location. Grant of the instant request will serve the public interest. A completed FCC Form 312 and a technical appendix are attached in support of this application. AMC—12 is a C—band satellite that was launched on February 2, 2005, and is licensed to operate at the 37.5" W.L. orbital position. AMC—12 recently 1 See Columbia Communications Corporation, Orderand Authorization, DA 05—244 (Sat. Div. rel. Jan. 28, 2005)(the "AMC—12 Order").

completed testing at 67.5° W.L., and Columbia has begun drifting the satellite to its assigned orbital location.* Columbia‘s parent, SES Americom, Inc.,is currently providing C:—band service at 87.5° W.L. using its Satcom C—1 spacecraf" Satcom C—1 is collocated with Loral Skynet‘s Telstar 11, and the two spacecraft have been flying in formation to permit sharing of the same stationkeeping volume (37.5° W.L. +/ 0.05 degrees). This arrangement has worked successfully, but requires a high dogree of collaboration on the part of the two operators and an increased number of mancuvers to maintain an appropriate separation between the spacecraft. In order to simplify stationkeeping on a going forward basis, Columbia and Loral Skynet have conducted discussions regarding operation of AMC—12 and Telstar 11 at offsets from the 37.5° W.L. nominal orbital position.. As a result of those discussions, Columbia has agreed to seek authority to operate AMC—12 centered at 37.45° W.L. with +/ 0.05 degree East/West stationkeeping, and Loral Skynet has agreed to seek authority to operate Telstar 11 at 97.55° W.L. +/— 0.05 degrees. This arrangementwill eliminate any overlap of the stationkeeping volumes of the two spacecraft, therebyfacilitating joint operations. As demonstrated in the technical appendix, grant of the requested authority will not adversely affect any other operators. The adjacent C—band satellites to AMC—12‘s assigned location are New Skies 806 at 40.5° W.L. and 5 See letter of Karis A. Hastings, counsel for Columbia Communications Corp., to Marlene H. Dortch dated Mar. 21, 2005. * See AMC—12 Order at 16.

Intelsat 903 at 34.5° W.L., each with 3° separation from 37.5° W.L.. Although the proposed offset would result in AMC—12 being slightly closer to Intelsat 903, the satellites will still be spaced 2.05 degrees apart, and there will be no material change to the existing interference environment. AMC—12 is fully compliant with the Commission‘s requirements with respect to operation at two—degree spacing.! For the foregoing reasons, Columbia seeks a modification of the AMC— 12 license to assign the spacecraft to the 37.45° W.L. orbital location. Respectfully submitted, COLUMBIA COMMUNICATIONS CORP. By: /s/ Naney J. Eshenazi Nancy J. Eskenazi Of Counsel Assistant Secretary Peter A. Rohrbach Columbia Communications Corp. Karis A. Hastings Four Research Way Hogan& Hartson LLP. Princeton, NJ 08540 Washington, D.C. 200041109 Tel: (202) 637—5600 Pax: (202) 637—5910 Dated: March 25, 2005 * See AMC—12 Order at % 8—10.

Technical Appendix 1. Introduction This technical appendix is submitted in support of the application of Columbia Communications Corporation (‘Columbia‘) for a modification of ts icense for the AMC— 12 C—band spacecraft. Columbia seeks permanent assignment of the spacecraft to 37 45° WL instead of 37.5° WL. Columbia incorporates by reference herein the technical information it has already provided with respect to AMC—12,! and provides here technical information that is changing as a result of the proposed modification: 2. Gain Contours Columbia is not submiting new contour maps with this application. The proposed shift in orbital location from 37.5° WL. to 37.45° W.L. will produce no visible change in the gain contours from the maps already on file 3. Link Budgets and Interference Analysis The adjacent C—band satelites to AMC—12‘s assigned location are New Skies 808 at 40.5° W.L. and Intelsat 903 at 34.5° W.L., each with 3° separation from 37.5° W.L Columbia provided an interference analysis with ts prior technical amendment that demonstrated that operation of AMC—12 was compatible with the adjacent satelites at 37.5° WLL. with the existing three—degree spacing or assuming two—degree spacing.* The proposed offset operation of AMC—12 will sightly increase the orbital separation between AMC—12 and New Skies 806, and slightly decrease the orbital separation between AMC—12 and Intelsat 903. In each case, Columbia has calculated that implementation of the proposed offset would resultin a change equal to or less than 0.18 dB in the interference environment of two—degree compliant earth stations communicating with the adjacent satelites, as shown in the table below. * See File Nos. SAT—MOD—20020517—00078 & SAT—AMD—20040825—00161. 4 See File No. SAT—AMD—20040828—00161, Narrative at 2—4 & Tables 1—4.

Intoisat wss Orbital Offset Angle 300 300 Gain(1) @ Offset angle tror | 1or Orbial Ofset Angle 205 sos Gain (2) @ Offst angle | tras 1880 4 (Gainl)) Gain C) 18 I on Given that the proposed offset operation of AMC—12 will not result in any material change to the existing interference environment with respect to AMC—12, New Skies 806, and Intelsat 903, no ink budget analysis is provided herein. in the uniikely event that any future concems arise concerning operations of AMC—12 at the proposed offset location, Columbia will coordinate with the adjacent operators in order to arrive at a mutually satifactory solution 4. Schedule $ As discussed above, the proposed modification of the AMC—12 license to offset the satelite by 0.05 degrees from 37.5° W.L. willnot result in any material changes to the spacecraft‘s operating characteristics or to the interference environment. As a result, the information requested in Schedule S duplicates information that is already on file with the Commission concerning the technical parameters of AMG—12‘s operation. in similar cases involving requests for slight offsets from the nominal orbital position,the Satelite Division has not required the submission of a new Schedule $" Accordingly, Columbia is not fing a new Schedule S with this application. Columbia will nevertheless prepare and submit a Schedule S if requested to do so by the Satelite Division * See, .. File No. SAT—MOD—20040405—00076 (PanAmSat requestfor authonty to operate SBS—6 at 74.05° W.L. rather than 74.0° W.L.). 2

DECLARATION OF JAIME LONDONO 1, Jaime Londono, hereby certfy under penalty of perjury that | am the technically qualfied person responsible for preparation of the technical information contained in the foregoing exhibitthat I am familiar with the technical requirements of Part 25; and that either prepared or reviewed the technical information contained in the exhibit and that itis complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge, information and beliet // Jaime Londono SES Americom, Inc. Dated: March 25, 2006

FCC Form 312 Exhibit A Page 1 of 1 ALIEN OWNERSHIP (Response to Item 34) Section 310(b)(4)of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, establishes certain limitations on indirect foreign ownership and voting of certain common carrier and broadcast licensees. By definition, these limitations do not apply to non—common carrier space station licenses held by Columbia Communications Corporation.

FCC Form 312 Exhibit B Page 1 of 1 APPLICATION DENIALS (Response to Item 36) In Columbia Communications Corp., Order, 103 FCC 24 618 (1985), the Commission denied Columbin‘s application for authority to construct, launch, and operate two hybrid satellites in the domestic fixed—satellite service upon finding that Columbia had failed to establish its financial qualifications. In Columbia Communications Corp., Order, File No. 932—D8S—P/L~84 (CCB, rel. March 7, 1986), the Common Carrier Burea, citing an outstanding freeze on space station applications for orbital locations between 30° W.L. and 60° W.L., refused to accept for fling an amondment to Columbin‘s application for a domestic satellite at 45° W.L. that would have converted the proposal to an international satellite application at 49° W.L. In Columbia Communications Corporation, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 15 FCC Red 15566, the International Bureau denied Columbia‘s petition to revoke the authorization of Loral Space & Communications, Ltd. (‘Loral®) to launch and operate a Ku—band satellite at 47° W.L. Purther, because Loral‘s authorization was left undisturbed, the Bureau denied Columbia‘s applications to modify its existing C—band satellite authorization at this location to add Ku—band capacity and to amend its 1987 Ku—band satellite application to move it to the 47° W.L. orbital location. In SES Americom, Inc., Order and Authorization, DA 04—1581 (Sat. Div. rel. May 27, 2004), the Satellite Division granted the application of Columbia‘s parent company SES Americom to modify its license for Sateom SN—4 to permanently assign that spacecraft to the 172° E.L. orbital location. The decision noted that Columbia had been authorized to construct a new satellite at that orbital location but stated that because Columbia had failed to meet the construction and launch milestones, its authorization had become null and void by its own terms. 1d. at 2 n5.

FCC Form 312 Exhibit C Page 1 of 2 List or STOCKHOLDERS, OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS (Response to Item 40) The applicant, Columbia Communications Corporation (‘Columbia") is a wholly—owned subsidiary of SES Americom, Inc. (SES Americom"). SES Americom is an indirect wholly—owned subsidiary of SES Global S.A. (SES Global"). SES Global—Americas, Inc. and four wholly—owned subsidiaries of SES Global— Americas, Inc. (SES Subsidiary Inc. 23, SES Subsidiary Inc. 24, SES Subsidiary Inc. 25 and SES Subsidiary Inc. 26) together directly hold 100% of the capital stock of SES AMERICOM. SES Global Americas Holdings GP, a Delaware general partnership that is wholly owned by SES Global, holds 100% of the capital stock of SES Global—Americas, Inc. With the exception of SES Global, all of these entities are U.S. corporations or partnerships. SES Global is a Luxembourg company, formed for the purpose of holding indirectly 100% of the shares of SES Americom and directly 100% of the shares of SES ASTRA (formerly Société Européenne des Satellites S.A.), as well as other non—European and non—U.S. satellite interests that were formerly owned by SES Americom and SBS ASTRA. Through its subsidiaries and affiliates, SES Global engages in the provision of satellite services in North and South America, Europe and Asin. SES Global has offices at L—6815 Chiteau de Betzdorf, Luxembourg. The address of the intermediary holding companies is 4 Research Way, Princeton, NJ 08540 The directors of Columbia are Romain Bausch and Robert J. Kisilywiez. The address of Mr. Bausch is SES Global S.A., L—6815 Chiteau de Betzdorf, Luxembourg. The address of Mr. Kisilywicz is Columbia Communications Corporation, 4 Research Way, Princeton, NJ 08540, Mr. Kisilywicz is a U.S. national. Mr. Bausch is a Luxembourg national. The officers of Columbia are: Brent Bruun Vice President Robort J. Kisilywicz Vice President Stanley Konopka Assistant Treasurer — Taxes Hanaa Nase Assistant Treasurer — Taxes David J. Lidstone Acting Secretary Nancy J. Eskenazi Assistant Secretary The address ofall the officers is Columbia Communications Corporation, 4 Research Way, Princeton, NJ 08540. All of the officers are U.S. nationals.

PCC Form 312 Exhibit C Page 2 of 2 The names, addresses, and citizenship of stockholders owning of record and/or voting 10 percent or more of SES Global‘s voting stock are: 1. General Electric Capital Corporation (°GE Capital") holds shares of SES Global representing an economic interest of 30.73% and voting power of 20.10%. GB Capital is a corporation organized under the laws of New York. GE Capital engages in a broad spectrum of financial services, including distribution, sales financing, commercial and industrial financing, real estate, transportation and reinsurance. GE Capital‘s address is as follows: General Electric Capital Corporation 260 Long Ridge Road Stamford, CT 06927 2. The State of Luxembourg and Banque et Caisse d‘Epargne de IEtat CBCEE®) and Société Nationale de Crédit et dInvestisement (‘SNCT®), each of which is an institution created by act of the Luxembourg Parliament and 100% owned by the State of Luxembourg, hold shares of SES Global, represnting a combined total economic interest of 16.67% and voting power of 34.90%. The principal business of both BCEB and SNCI is financial services. The addresses of BCEE and SNCI are as follows: Banque et Caisse d‘Epargne de IEtat 1, place de Metz 1—2054 Luxembourg Société Nationale de Crédit ot d‘Investisement 7, place du St. Esprit L—1475 Luxembourg The address for the State of Luxembourg is Ministry of State, 4 rue de la Congrégation, L—2910, Luxembourg.


Document Created: 2005-05-05 15:20:26
Document Modified: 2005-05-05 15:20:26
© 2025 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC