Attachment letter

letter

LETTER submitted by Globalstar

letter

2007-05-25

This document pretains to SAT-MOD-20030606-00098 for Modification on a Satellite Space Stations filing.

IBFS_SATMOD2003060600098_573022

                               Federal Communications Commission
                                      Washington, DC 20554
International Bureau                                            s2115
                                                                              SAT—AMD—
                                            May 25, 2007        Globalstar, Inc. AMD—20050105—00003      182005000019
                                                           s2115         SAT—MOD—199803
                                                                 .               —      08—
                                                           L/Q Licensee, Inc.              00044
      William Adler                                        $2115
      Vice President and Assistant Secretar y               5
                                                            Gzns           SAT—MOD—20030805—00088     12200300 1050
      Globalstar, Inc.                                        lobalstar, Inc.
      461 So. Milpitas Blvd.                                Globaistar
      Milpitas, CA 95035
                                            Re: Call Sign $2115
     Dear Mr. Adler:

     Thank you for the information provided concerning the status of the Globalstar
     constellation in your November 20, 2006 letter to John Giusti, as well as in your February
     20, 2007 briefing and subsequent February 28, 2007 email to International Bureau staff.
     Based upon the information provided, it is our understanding that Globalstar has
     modified the configuration of its constellation, such that its eight authorized planes no
     longer consist of five operational satellites evenly spaced satellites within the plane. It is
     our understanding that these changes were made following technical difficulties with a
     significant number of the Globalstar satellites and were designed to maintain continuity
     of service to consumers to the greatest extent possible. Accordingly, Globalstar should
     seek authorization for the modification to its constellation.

     Based upon Globalstar‘s November 20 certification and subsequent discussions, it is our
     understanding that Globalstar believes that certain technical parameters are not a binding
     part of its authorization. These parameters include spacing between satellites, and
     possibly also the number of in—orbit spares, the number of in—orbit test bed satellites, and
     the number of operating satellites.

     Technical specifications relied upon in granting authority and incorporated in the grant of
     authority are a material part of the authorization. Globalstar‘s authorization is
     specifically premised upon the "terms, conditions, and technical specifications set forth"
     in its application for authority. Any changes in operations inconsistent with this
     limitation must be undertaken pursuant to authorization under Title III of the
     Communications Act.

     In addition, because the replacement satellites would not be launched into an authorized
     orbital configuration, we do not consider the certification filed on November 20 to be for
     "technically identical" satellites, and therefore, do not consider it to be effective.

     Globalstar should file appropriate applications for modification of its license and/or
     special temporary authority in connection with the current and contemplated future
     configuration of its constellation. In the event that material terms of the Globalstar


authorization would constrain Globalstar‘s ability to react expeditiously to technical
issues that may affect consumer service, we would consider specific proposals for
modifying the material terms of the authorization to eliminate or modify those terms.

Further, any action taken on any application for modification or special temporary
authority is without prejudice to any enforcement action the Commission may deem
appropriate. Please feel free to contact me or Karl Kensinger of my staff should you
have any questions.

                                             Sincerely,


                                             C}WCGZL?»AA/
                                             Robert G. Nelson            fh«
                                             Chief, Satellite Division



Document Created: 2007-06-06 16:34:26
Document Modified: 2007-06-06 16:34:26

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC