Attachment 1992NEXSAT jan 6 ltr

1992NEXSAT jan 6 ltr

LETTER submitted by NEXSAT

letter

1992-01-06

This document pretains to SAT-MOD-19901031-00062 for Modification on a Satellite Space Stations filing.

IBFS_SATMOD1990103100062_1078763

                                                                                      RECEIVED
                                 GOLDBERG & SPECTOR                                      JAN — 6 1992
                                     1229 NINETEENTH STREET, N.W.
                                        WASHINGTON,
                                          AS            D.C. 20036
                                               GTOoN, D.C.                                        Inntinne ‘._,Ia,'m-u:Sb‘Ofl
                                                                                Federa! CO[flmk!fl‘(;alLOf'~> t AXiHINES

                                                                                         Office of the Secretary
HENRY goLpsERra                                                                                 (202) 429—4900
PHILLIP L. SPECTOR                                                                               TELECOPIER:
JEFFREY H. OLSON                                        ;                                       (202) 4294912
JOSEPH A. GODLES                                                                                    TELEx:
JONATHAN L. WIENER                                                                                  892320
HENRIETTA WRIGHT
THOMAS G. GHERARDI, P.C.                  January 6, 1992
counseEL                                            f



     Donna R. Searcy, Secretary
     Federal Communications Commission
     1919 M Street, N.W.
     Washington, D.C. 20554

                           Re:    National Exchange Satellite, Inc.    hAr
                                 File Nos. 4/5—DSS—EXT—90                          , @@t
                                                                                                  &
     Dear Madam Secretary:                                                          ymE 8.
                                                                           sug EP        o is
                                                                    pome?" ‘"geaA)!
            This letter is written to apprise the Commission of recent fié&\e\lopments
     regarding construction of National Exchange Satellite, Inc.‘s ("NEXSAT") domestic
     fixed service satellite system.

            As the Commission is aware, NEXSAT entered into an agreement with TRW,
     Inc. Space and Technology Group ("TRW") which provided that TRW would: (1)
     conduct an in—depth design study (the "TRW Study") comparing the relative merits
     of large hybrid spacecraft with smaller satellites, including "lightsats," consistent
     with the basic design concept for the SpotNet satellites, and (2) depending on the
     results of the TRW Study, construct the spacecraft for NEXSAT. See Letter from
     Henry Goldberg to Donna R. Searcy, dated March 1, 1991. The TRW Study recently
     was completed and concludes that, rather than one large hybrid spacecraft
     occupying each of NEXSAT‘s two assigned orbital locations, two smaller hybrid
     satellites should be deployed at each position.

            Contemporaneous with the preparation of the TRW Study, NEXSAT has
     engaged in a series of discussions with the EDSAT Institute ("EDSAT"), which
     recently concluded an exhaustive study of the present and planned needs of the
     national educational community for transponder capacity. EDSAT determined that,
     in the aggregate, the educational community‘s present demand for transponder
     capacity has grown to the point that the entire capacity of a communications satellite
     is needed during periods of peak use. Further, EDSAT forecasts a substantial
     increase in that demand during the next decade. Thus, "[al critical juncture has been
     reached by [the educational community] with respect to the use of communications
     satellites to distribute instructional materials to students of all academic levels," and


Ms. Donna M. Searcy
January 6, 1992
Page 2


"there should be at least one dedicated national educational satellite network to
serve these needs." Letter from H. Brian Thompson, Chairman, EDSAT
Corporation, to Clay T. Whitehead, President, National Exchange Satellite, Inc.,
dated December 9, 1991, at 1 (a copy is attached hereto).

       Consistent with these findings, EDSAT and NEXSAT have initiated an "in—
depth, joint feasibility study of both the technical and economic merits" of the
SpotNet system vis—a—vis the educational community‘s present and future needs.
Id. at 2. According to EDSAT, any such system must include, inter alia, 50—state
coverage at both C—band and Ku—band. Id. The ultimate goal of this effort is to
determine how the configuration of the SpotNet spacecraft can be optimized to meet
the unique needs of the educational community. Among other factors to be evalu—
ated is that the need of the educational community for nationwide broadcast
coverage, as well as point—to—point services, will require some modification of the
present NEXSAT design concept.

      NEXSAT will, of course, keep the Commission informed with regard to this
matter. In order to accommodate this vital educational project, NEXSAT requests
that it be accorded an additional 12 to 18 months within which to complete the
above—described joint feasibility study and either (1) begin construction of the first of
the SpotNet satellites, or (2) if need be, submit an application to the Commission
seeking to modify the SpotNet construction permit in order to conform system
design to EDSAT requirements and/or TRW‘s recommendations.

       If there are any questions regarding this matter, please contact the under—
signed.

                                                Respectfully submitted,




                                                   Henry Goldberg
                                                  Jeffrey H. Olson
                                                    Attorneys for
                                         National Exchange Satellite, Inc.


cc:   James R. Keegan, Chief
        Domestic Facilities Division
      Cecily C. Holiday, Chief
        Satellite Radio Branch
      Lewis J. Paper, Esq.




                                                            GOLDBERG & SPECTOR


             National Education Telecommunications Organization .
                                                 NETO

 December 9, 1991

 Mr. Clay T. Whitehead
 President, National Exchange Satellite, Inc.
 1320 Chain Bridge Road, Suite 410
 McLean, VA 22101

 Dear Torm:


 This letter is intended to reflect the substance of our various conversations over the past
 several months, regarding the needs of the Nation‘s education community for access to a
 dedicated communications satellite with fifty—state coverage.

 A critical juncture has been reachedby various educational institutions with respect to the
 use of communications satellites to distribute instructional materials to students of all
 academic levels. In a recent study of the activities of educational users of satellite services,
 the EDSA‘T Institute found that the aggregated transponder capacity required to meet
 demand for such services has increased to the point that, during peak hours of use, the
 educational community‘s needs would all but exhaust the capacity of a single
 communications satellite, and that this level of demand will only continue to grow. After
 much further study and many outreach meetings of various vested interest groups, a new
 organization has been formed——the National Education Telecommunications Organization
 (NETO)——charged with the objective of coordinating the affected community and bringing
 together their needs into a single, integrated management organization to help identify and
 fill their needs. In addition, NETO has established a separate operating subsidiary——the
 EDSAT Corporation——for the purpose of procuring, owning, and operating the space
 segment component needed to meet the demands of the NETO members.


 Although NETO and the EDSAT Corporation will not hold their formal meetings until
 January, 1992, EDSAT believes that it is evident that there should be at least one dedicated
 national education satellite network to serve these needs. Based on our prior discussions,
 EDSAT wishes to explore whether the satellite system proposed by National Exchange
 Satellite, Inc. ("Nexsat") may provide the type of flexible and diverse communications
 capabilities that would best serve the interests of the educational community, Therefore,



400 Xorth Capitol Street, MW.   Suite 5850 _   Washington, D.C. 20001   (202) 508—4484   FAX (202) 508—4476


Mr. Clay T. Whitehead
December 9, 1991
Page 2

we propose an in—depth, foint feasibility study of both the technical and economic merits of
the Nexsat system for the educational community. This study will be most useful to the
EDSAT Corporation as it develops plans and options to acquire an entire satellite system
devoted to educational users and/or to acquire a critical mass of transponders dedicated to
education on a more general purpose satellite system.

The study assumes that the Nexsat system will have C—band and Ku—band capacity at both
the 93 W.1., and 127 W.L, orbital locations. We understand that Nexsat presently is
authorized by the FCC to operate one hybrid satellite at each orbital location, although the
company is exploring the potential advantages of deploying two or more separate
"lightsats" at each location. At this point, EDSAT has no strong preference for one
configuration or the other. Given, however, the current usage patterns of the educational
community, EDSAT believes that a dedicated system must provide substantial capacity in
both C—band and Ku—band to avoid premature replacement of existing terrestrial equipment;
cross—strapping capability is also considered to be {mportant.


The relative merits of various spacecraft cénfigurations and frequency plans should be
subjects of the study, both from the cconornic and technical perspectives. An additional
area of potential cross—savings that we would wish to explore involves emerging digital
compression techniques. Obviously, all configurations must be compatible with the
various fiscal and service constraints under which educational institutions generally must
operate.

I look forward to working with Nexsat on this study.

Very



  . Brian Thompson
Chairman, EDSAT Corporation


HBT/cb



Document Created: 2015-02-27 16:13:40
Document Modified: 2015-02-27 16:13:40

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC