Attachment letter

letter

LETTER submitted by GlobalStar

letter

2003-07-14

This document pretains to SAT-LOA-19970926-00154 for Application to Launch and Operate on a Satellite Space Stations filing.

IBFS_SATLOA1997092600154_718346

                                    1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20004—2595 =   p202 624-,25NIA LOZ 628—5116

crowell                   —
          [€mormng                                                                     RECEIVED
                                                                                         JUL 1 4 2003
                                                                                  Federal Communicati         fant
                                                                                          Offic:glfcgefgstacr:mmlssm
                                             July 14, 2003

   Gafe /file Divisien
  Ms—Ma                                                                       Int‘] Bureau
  éecretary                                                                    JUL + 5 °093
  Federal Communications Commission                                                     .
  445 Twelfth Street, SW                                                      Front Office
  Washington, DC 20554

        RE:     File Nos: 183/184/185/186—S8AT—P/LA—97; 182—SAT—P/LA—97(64)

               IBFS Application File Numbers:
               SAT—LOA—19970926—00151—154                                             RGCeived
               SAT—LOA—19970926—00156                                                JU
               SAT—AMD—20011103—0154                                                     L { 42003
               SAT—MOD—20020717—00116—119                                            Poligy Brg
               SAT—MOD—20020717—00107—110                                        Internationgj B“'frgau
               SAT—MOD—20020722—00112
               Call Signs S2320/82321/82322/82323/82324

  Dear Ms. Dortch:

        On January 29, 2003, the International Bureau adopted a Memorandum
  Opinion and Order ("MO&O"), DA 03—328, in which it denied a request by
  Globalstar, L.P. ("GLP"), for modification of certain implementation milestones
  associated with its 2 GHz Mobile—Satellite Service ("MSS") system and canceled all
  GLP‘s 2 GHz MSS licenses.

        The Bureau‘s denial of GLP‘s request for extension of certain milestones was
  founded on a policy used in the MO&O, but not previously made known to the
  public. In canceling the 2 GHz MSS licenses, the Bureau reasoned that, since the
  satellite construction contract between GLP and Space Systems/Loral, Inc.,
  incorporated the milestones as proposed for modification rather than the milestones
  in GLP‘s original licensing order, the contract could not meet the Commission‘s
  requirement that a satellite licensee enter into a non—contingent construction
  contract within one year of the date of licensing. Rather than giving GLP an
  opportunity to cure its contract with Space Systems to conform with the original
  milestone schedule, the Bureau simply canceled the licenses for failure to conform
  to the original milestone schedule.




              Crowell & Moring LLP a www.crowell.com a Washington @= Irvine & London a= Brussels


Ms. Marlene H. Dortch
July 14, 2003
Page 2


      On March 3, 2003, GLP filed an "Emergency Application for Review" and
"Request for Stay" of the Bureau‘s decision. Both remain pending.

      Among other points made in its Emergency Application for Review, GLP
explained that the Bureau‘s policy under which it canceled GLP‘s licenses and
refused to provide an opportunity to cure was a new policy, one which GLP could
not have known or anticipated. Indeed, the Bureau felt obligated to overturn an
earlier decision to bring its precedent into line with the new policy. (MO&OQO, 12.)
However, the Bureau erred by applying its new policy retroactively to cancel GLP‘s
licenses.! GLP outlined the relevant law thus:

                     It is well settled that "[tJraditional concepts of due
             process incorporated into administrative law preclude an
             agency from penalizing a private party for violating a rule
             without first providing adequate notice of the substance of
             the rule." Indeed, when announcing policies affecting
             milestone enforcement in prior decisions, the Commission
             has made the policy prospective only. By revising long—
             standing policy and precedent without prior notice, the
             MO&QO violated GLP‘s right to due process.?

      In a recent order, the Bureau has "explained" the new policy under which it
cancelled GLP‘s license five months ago.$ Specifically, in granting an application for
modification of The Boeing Company‘s 2 GHz MSS license, the Bureau ruled that
Boeing‘s satellite construction contract complied with the milestone requirement
even though the contract reflected the proposed rather than originally—licensed
system. In a footnote, the Bureau stated:

             That Boeing arranged for construction of the [modified
             system] proposed in its license—modification application,



       1 Emergency Application for Review, at 18—19 (filed Mar. 3, 2003) (citing
Satellite Broadcasting Co. v. FCC, 824 F.2d 1, 3 (D.C. Cir. 1987); Eastern Carolinas
Broadcasting Co. v. FCC, 762 F.2d 95, 101 (D.C. Cir. 1985); Trinity Broadcasting of
Florida, Inc. v. FCC, 211 F.3d 618, 632 (D.C. Cir. 2000)).
       2 Emergency Application for Review, at 19 (footnotes omitted) (quoting
Satellite Broadcasting Co. v. FCC, 824 F.2d at 3).
      3 See The Boeing Company, Order and Authorization, DA 03—2073 (released
June 24, 20083).




            Crowell & Moring LLP a www.crowell.com a Washington s Irvine a London a Brussels


Ms. Marlene H. Dortch
July 14, 2003
Page 3


              rather than the [system] for which it had license authority
              as of the milestone deadline date, is not a material
              deficiency, given our favorable disposition of the
              application for modification. Had we denied the request
              for license modification, on the other hand, we could not
              have found that Boeing‘s arrangements for construction of
              a [modified] system satisfied the first milestone
              requirement.*

      It is appropriate for the Bureau to articulate its policy clearly. However, its
explanation comes too late. The Bureau cannot cure its failure in the MO&O to
follow the law with respect to GLP by publishing post hoc explanations and policy
pronouncements.

      Now that the Bureau has essentially conceded that its action with respect in
the MO&O was unlawful, there is no reason to delay acting on GLP‘s Emergency
Application for Review. The MO&O clearly and undeniably violates the due process
requirements as set forth in Satellite Broadcasting and other cases. Accordingly,
GLP‘s Emergency Application for Review must be granted and GLP‘s 2 GHz MSS
licenses reinstated.

                                                 Respectfully submitted,

                                                 GLOBALSTAR, LP.

Of Counsel:                                      b

William F. Adler                                 William D. Wallace
Vice President, Legal and
       Regulatory Affairs
Globalstar, LP.
3200 Zanker Road
San Jose, CA 95134
(408) 983—4401




      4 Id., at 12 n.56 (citations omitted).




              Crowell & Moring LLP = www.crowell.com = Washington «= Irvine a London a Brussels


                           CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE


      I, William D. Wallace, hereby certify that I have on this 14th day of July,

2003, caused to be served true and correct copies of the foregoing "Letter" upon the

following persons via hand delivery (marked with an asterisk (*)) or first—class

United States mail, postage prepaid:

The Honorable Michael K. Powell *           The Honorable Kathleen Q. Abernathy *
Chairman                                    Commissioner
Federal Communications Commission           Federal Communications Commission
445 12th Street, SW                         445 12th Street, S.W.
Washington, DC 20554                        Washington, D.C. 20554

The Honorable Michael Copps *               The Honorable Kevin Martin *
Commissioner                                Commissioner
Federal Communications Commission           Federal Communications Commission
445 12th Street, S.W.                       445 12th Street, S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20554                      Washington, D.C. 20554

The Honorable Jonathan S. Adelstein         John Rogovin *
Commissioner                                Office of General Counsel
Federal Communications Commission           Federal Communications Commission
445 12th Street, S.W.                       445 12th Street, S.W., Room 6—A665
Washington, D.C. 20554                      Washington, D.C. 20554

Donald Abelson *                            Thomas S. Tyez *
International Bureau                        International Bureau
Federal Communications Commission           Federal Communications Commission
445 12th Street, S.W., Room 6—C750          445 12th Street, S.W., Room 6—A665
Washington, D.C. 20554                      Washington, D.C. 20554

Karl A. Kensinger *                         Howard Griboff *
International Bureau                        International Bureau
Federal Communications Commission           Federal Communications Commission
445 Twelfth Street, S.W., Room 6—A663       445 12th Street, S.W., Room 6—C467
Washington, D.C. 20554                      Washington, D.C. 20554


Fern J. Jarmulnek *                    Cassandra Thomas *
International Bureau                   International Bureau
Federal Communications Commission      Federal Communications Commission
445 12th Street, S.W.                  445 12th Street, S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20554                 Washington, D.C. 20554

Bryan Tramont *                        Jennifer Manner *
Office of Chairman Michael Powell      Office of Commissioner Kathleen Abernathy
Federal Communications Commission.     Federal Communications Commission
445 12th Street, S.W.                  445 12th Street, S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20554                 Washington, D.C. 20554

Paul Margie *                          Barry Ohlson *
Office of Commissioner Michael Copps   Office of Commissioner Jonathan Adelstein
Federal Communications Commission      Federal Communications Commission
445 12th Street, S.W.                  445 12th Street, S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20554                 Washington, D.C. 20554

Sam Feder *                            Joseph A. Godles
Office of Commissioner Kevin Martin    Goldberg, Godles, Wiener & Wright
Federal Communications Commission      1229 19th Street, N.W.
445 12th Street, S.W.                  Washington, D.C. 20036
Washington, D.C. 20554

Tom W. Davidson                        L. Andrew Tollin
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld,        Kathryn A. Zachem
LL.P.                                  Craig E. Gilmore
1676 International Drive               Wilkinson Barker Knauer, LLP
Penthouse                              2300 N Street, NW., Suite 700
McLean, VA 22102                       Washington, D.C. 20037

Douglas I. Brandon                     John T. Scott, III
AT&T Wireless Services, Inc.           Cellco Partnership
1150 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.          d/b/a Verizon Wireless
Washington, D.C. 20036                 1300 I Street, NW., Suite 400—W
                                       Washington, D.C. 20005


J.R. Carbonell
Carol L. Tacker
David G. Richards
Cingular Wireless LLC
5565 Glenridge Connector, Suite 1700
Atlanta, GA 30342




                                       QMJ@G_S\
                                       William D. Wallace



Document Created: 2019-04-09 08:02:00
Document Modified: 2019-04-09 08:02:00

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC