Attachment Req for Acceptance o

This document pretains to SAT-LOA-19941116-00088 for Application to Launch and Operate on a Satellite Space Stations filing.

IBFS_SATLOA1994111600088_973530

RECEIVED Vinson&¥Elkins ATTORNEYS AT LaAW MAR ‘ 6 1998 VINSON & ELKINS LLP P d te eer, mniading THE WILLARD OFFICE BUILDING Federal Communications Gommission 1455 PENNSYLVANIA AVE., N.W. Oftice of Secratary WASHINGTON, D.C. 20004—1008 TELEPHONE (202) 639—6500 FAX (202) 639—6604 WRITER‘S TELEPHONE g (202) 639—6755 Fe cey [ele| es 'E‘ i ;5 March 16, 1998 aaagis potcy BC S Ms. Magalie R. Salas "imte! Burgay Secretary Federal Communications Commission 1919 M Street, N.W., Room 222 Washington, DC 20554 Re: Final Analysis Communication Services, Inc. File No. 25—SAT—P/LA—95; 7—SAT—AMEND—98 Request for Acceptance of Supplemental Comments Dear Ms. Salas: Leo One USA Corporation ("Leo One USA"), by its counsel, hereby requests acceptance of the attached supplemental comments concerning the above—referenced application of Final Analysis Communications Services, Inc. ("Final Analysis"). Leo One USA recognizes that the Commission is reluctant to accept supplemental comments beyond the normal comment period specified in the public notice accepting for filing a particular application. Nonetheless, Section 1.45(c) of the Commission‘s Rules, 47 C.F.R. § 1.45(c), explicitly authorizes the Commission to accept comments outside the normal pleading cycle where the public interest will be served by such action. The proposed supplemental comments of Leo One USA enhance the record in the above—referenced matter by providing new information regarding the reorganization ofthe Russian launch industry and the impact such reorganization may have on Final Analysis‘ ability to obtain Russian launch services free of charge. This information may be of decisional significance with regard to the Commission‘s consideration of the pending application of Final Analysis to be a Little LEO licensee. Consequently, acceptance ofthese supplemental comments will advance the public interest and assist the Commission‘s adjudication of this matter. Recent press reports indicate that portions of the above—referenced application may be inaccurate. Specifically, these press reports raise serious questions as to the validity of Final Analysis‘ representations regarding its financial qualifications made in its pending application. This is precisely the type of situation which warrants acceptance of supplemental comments pursuant to Section 1.45(c). The Commission has an obligation to obtain a complete record, and these supplemental comments will assist that effort. Leo One USA has filed this information in a timely HOUSTON DALLAS WASHINGTON, D.C. AUSTIN moscow LONDON SINGAPORE

= Ms. Magalie R. Salas March 16, 1998 Page 2 fashion and anticipates that acceptance of these supplemental comments will in no way prejlidice Final Analysis‘ ability to ensure an accurate record exists before the Commission. For the foregoing reasons, Leo One USA Corporation requests acceptance of the attached supplemental comments. ‘ Respectfully submitted, 2s\ Ngr Albert Shuldiner Counsel for Leo One USA Corporation Enclosure ce: Regina Keeney Cassandra Thomas Daniel Connors All parties of record


Document Created: 2012-10-24 15:26:59
Document Modified: 2012-10-24 15:26:59
© 2025 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC