08-17-10 115 License

LETTER submitted by c/o Pegasus Development DBS Corporation

Letter Requesting Prompt Action

2010-08-17

This document pretains to SAT-AMD-20080114-00023 for Amended Filing on a Satellite Space Stations filing.

IBFS_SATAMD2008011400023_835132

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
2300 N Street, NW | Washington, DC 20037-1122 | tel 202.663.8000 | fax 202.663.8007




                                                                                              Tony Lin
                                                                                      tel 202.663.8452
                                                                             tony.lin@pillsburylaw.com

                                          August 17, 2010

Via Electronic Filing (IBFS)

Mindel De La Torre
Bureau Chief, International Bureau
Federal Communications Commission
445 12th Street, S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20554

         Re:      115 License Subsidiary, LLC
                  Call Sign 2700
                  Request for Prompt Action on Milestone Compliance Determination

Dear Ms. De La Torre:

         115 License Subsidiary, LLC (the “Company”), by its counsel, hereby
requests that the International Bureau (“Bureau”) take prompt action in reviewing the
Company’s compliance with its requirement to execute a binding, non-contingent
satellite construction contract for a 17/24 GHz Broadcasting-Satellite Service satellite
at the 115°W.L. orbital location. The Company provided a complete copy of its
satellite construction contract to the Bureau in December of last year. Over four
months ago, the Company submitted a letter from the satellite manufacturer, Space
Systems/Loral, Inc., providing further evidence that the Company timely met its
initial milestone requirement. Further, over two months ago, the Company requested
the Bureau to take prompt action regarding this same issue. However, the Bureau still
has not taken any action.

       The Bureau’s delay is inexplicable. A survey of the time it has taken the
Bureau to review other satellite contracts shows that since 2006 the International
Bureau has taken on average only 5.6 months to make a milestone compliance
determination. It has now been over eight months, and the Company’s inquiries to
the Bureau regarding the status of its contract review suggest that it is not near
completion.




www.pillsburylaw.com                                                                      402227236v1


August 17, 2010
Page 2




         The Company urges the Bureau to remedy this administrative delay promptly.
The delay is not without real world repercussions. The Bureau’s protracted milestone
compliance assessment creates regulatory uncertainty. Additionally, such delay
creates unnecessary costs to the Company and ties up funds that could be used for
satellite construction or other business purposes. While the Company appreciates the
Bureau’s need for time to make informed milestone determinations, that need must be
balanced against the licensee’s business interests. For these reasons, the Company
respectively urges the Bureau to take prompt action in reviewing the Company’s
compliance with its requirement to execute a binding, non-contingent satellite
construction contract.

         Please direct any questions regarding this matter to the undersigned.

                                              Respectfully submitted,

                                                      /s/

                                              Bruce D. Jacobs
                                              Tony Lin
                                              Counsel to 115 License Subsidiary, LLC
cc:      Robert Nelson
         Andrea Kelly




www.pillsburylaw.com                                                             402227236v1



Document Created: 2010-08-17 11:36:25
Document Modified: 2010-08-17 11:36:25

© 2025 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC