S2711 and S2712 Lett

Ex PARTE PRESENTATION NOTIFICATION LETTER submitted by DIRECTV Enterprises, LLC

Ex Parte Letter

2009-01-28

This document pretains to SAT-AMD-20080114-00013 for Amended Filing on a Satellite Space Stations filing.

IBFS_SATAMD2008011400013_690987

HARRIS,                                                                                1200 EIGHTEENTH STREET, NW
                                                                                       WASHINGTON, DC 20036

WI I.TSH | RE   &                                                                      TEL 202.730.1300   FAX 202.730.1301
                                                                                       WWW.HARRISWILTSHIRE.COM
GRANNIS ur                                                                             ATTORNEYS AT LAW




                                                January 28, 2009

     BY ELECTRONIC FILING

     Marlene H. Dortch
     Office of the Secretary
     Federal Communications Commission
     445 12"" Street, S.W.
     Washington, D.C. 20554

             Re:    DIRECTY Enterprises, LLC
                    IBFS File Nos. SAT—AMD—20080114—00013 and —00014

     Dear Ms. Dortch:

             This is to inform you that Stacy Fuller, Jack Wengryniuk, Michael Nilsson, and
     undersigned counsel representing DIRECTV Enterprises, LLC ("DIRECTV") met
     yesterday with Robert Nelson, Cassandra Thomas, Fern Jarmulnek, Andrea Kelly,
     Kathyrn Medley, Stephen Duall, Diane Garfield, and Chip Fleming of the Commission‘s
     International Bureau to discuss the Bureau‘s recent decision to dismiss DIRECTYV‘s
     17/24 GHz BSS application at 103° W.L.‘ In that meeting, we explained why the
     dismissal of that application would not lead to a similar result with respect to
     DIRECTV‘s pending 17/24 GHz BSS application at the nominal 99° W.L. orbital
     location. We also noted that the Bureau‘s conclusion that DIRECTV‘s application was
     defective because its demonstration of compliance with the applicable PFD limits under
     "clear sky" conditions impermissibly included consideration of atmospheric effects is
     inconsistent with prior Commission precedent. Specifically, the Commission defined the
     term "clear sky" in the course of the 17/24 GHz BSS rulemaking proceeding as follows:

             The clear—sky value is taken to be the condition when the intrinsic
             atmospheric attenuation due to gasses and water vapor are applicable,
             without additional attenuation due to tropospheric precipitation, such as
             rain or snow. See Recommendation ITU—R PN.676—1."


     ‘   See DIRECTY Enterprises, LLC, DA 09—87 (Int‘l Bur., rel. Jan. 16, 2009).

         See Establishment ofPolicies and Service Rules for the Broadcasting Satellite Service at the 17.3—17.7
         GHz Frequency Band and at the 17.7—17.8 GHz Frequency Band Internationally, and at the 24.75—
         25.25 GHz Frequency Bandfor Fixed Satellite Services Providing Feeder Links to the Broadcasting—


HARRIS, WILTSHIRE & GRANNIS LLP

Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary
January 28, 2009
Page 2 of 2


This explains the structure of Section 25.208, which (as DIRECTV previously pointed
out) clearly demonstrates that the Commission intended to distinguish between "clear
sky" cor31ditions (which include atmospheric effects) and "free space" conditions (which
do not).

                                                        Sincerely yours,




                                                        William M. Wiltshire
                                                        Counselfor DIRECTVY Enterprises, LLC



ce:       Robert Nelson
          Cassandra Thomas
          Fern Jarmulnek
          Andrea Kelly
          Kathyrn Medley
          Stephen Duall
          Diane Garfield
          Chip Fleming
          Howard W. Waltzman (counselfor Spectrum Five, LLC)




      Satellite Service andfor the Broadcasting Satellite Service Operating Bi—directionally in the 17.3—17.7
      GHz Frequency Band, 21 FCC Red. 7426, « 49 n.126 (2006) (emphasis added).

3     See Letter from William M. Wiltshire to Marlene H. Dortch, FCC File No. SAT—AMD—20080114—
      00014, att. at 2 and n.7 and 8 (Dec. 8, 2008).



Document Created: 2019-04-13 19:28:27
Document Modified: 2019-04-13 19:28:27

© 2024 FCC.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FCC